Am 29.08.2012, 22:40 Uhr, schrieb David Edmundson
:
I don't quite understand the point you're trying to make, you propose
how a guest session could work, and it's quite similar to what
actually happens in LightDM. There's quite a few extra complications,
but not a lot.
I'm not aware of a sin
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Thomas Lübking
wrote:
> Am 29.08.2012, 03:21 Uhr, schrieb Harald Sitter :
>
>> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 2:59 AM, Thomas Lübking
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> but I'm willing to
>>> be enlightened about the striking advances of this integration.
>>
>>
>> https://wiki.ubuntu.com
Am 29.08.2012, 03:21 Uhr, schrieb Harald Sitter :
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 2:59 AM, Thomas Lübking
wrote:
but I'm willing to
be enlightened about the striking advances of this integration.
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopTeam/Specs/Intrepid/GuestAccount
Thanks for the link.
Reads like they
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 2:59 AM, Thomas Lübking
wrote:
> but I'm willing to
> be enlightened about the striking advances of this integration.
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopTeam/Specs/Intrepid/GuestAccount
Am 28.08.2012, 23:35 Uhr, schrieb Albert Astals Cid :
And as been already said nobody is forcing you to use it, you can
disable the feature.
That's not the point. I can take care of myself, thanks.
(And for the records: the tarball code actually defaults to "false" -
security opt-in is appa
El Dimarts, 28 d'agost de 2012, a les 01:17:03, Thomas Lübking va escriure:
> Am 28.08.2012, 00:25 Uhr, schrieb Martin Sandsmark
>
> :
> > On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 01:58:57PM +0100, David Edmundson wrote:
> >> Features LightDM-KDE has that KDM does not:
> >> - Guest support login
> >
> > What doe
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:02 PM, Martin Sandsmark
wrote:
> Now I'm really confused, isn't the wallpaper just set in /etc/kde4/kdm/kdmrc?
not if you're in themed mode. in which case the theme specifies it, afik
--
Shaun Reich,
KDE Software Developer (kde.org)
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 01:17:03AM +0200, Thomas Lübking wrote:
> To me it sounds as if the package contains a postinstall script to
> "useradd guest" for a pwdless login.
> I cannot say to really appreciate such "feature" :-\
Uh, that sounds kind of bad for a DM, yes.
> He's talking about the x
Am 28.08.2012, 00:25 Uhr, schrieb Martin Sandsmark
:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 01:58:57PM +0100, David Edmundson wrote:
Features LightDM-KDE has that KDM does not:
- Guest support login
What does the DM have to do with this?
David Edmundson schrieb
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Thomas
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 01:58:57PM +0100, David Edmundson wrote:
> Features LightDM-KDE has that KDM does not:
> - Guest support login
What does the DM have to do with this?
> - Ability to make customisations such as changing the background
> without having to edit XML
Isn't the kdm config fi
On Thursday 23 August 2012 12:57:43 Harald Sitter wrote:
> FWIW, last I talked to Robert about Canonical's involvement (which I
> believe was at UDS in May last year) only the greeters were to be
> covered by the CLA.
Only the greeters created by Canonical, not all of them.
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Thomas Lübking
wrote:
> Am 22.08.2012, 14:58 Uhr, schrieb David Edmundson
> :
>
> Sorry, this is certainly too much in details, but what is that
>
>
>> Features LightDM-KDE has that KDM does not:
>> - Guest support login
>
>
> supposed to be?
>
> I mean, either th
Am 22.08.2012, 14:58 Uhr, schrieb David Edmundson
:
Sorry, this is certainly too much in details, but what is that
Features LightDM-KDE has that KDM does not:
- Guest support login
supposed to be?
I mean, either there's a guest account on the machine or there's not.
If you intend to sell
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 12:27 PM, David Edmundson
wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 11:53 PM, Matthias Klumpp
> wrote:
>> 2012/8/22 Albert Astals Cid :
>>> El Dimecres, 22 d'agost de 2012, a les 13:58:57, David Edmundson va
>>> escriure:
As you're all probably aware I've been working on a n
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 11:53 PM, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
> 2012/8/22 Albert Astals Cid :
>> El Dimecres, 22 d'agost de 2012, a les 13:58:57, David Edmundson va escriure:
>>> As you're all probably aware I've been working on a new login manager
>>> for KDE [1]. Currently known as LightDM-KDE, named
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 8:41 AM, Andras Mantia wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 22, 2012 01:58:57 PM David Edmundson wrote:
>> - a big refactor (see branch "big_refactor")
>
> Without going into other details: what would be the reason to merge LightDM
> *now*, if you have a big refactoring undergoin
On Wednesday, August 22, 2012 01:58:57 PM David Edmundson wrote:
> - a big refactor (see branch "big_refactor")
Without going into other details: what would be the reason to merge LightDM
*now*, if you have a big refactoring undergoing?
Andras
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Yuri Chornoivan wrote:
> написане Wed, 22 Aug 2012 15:58:57 +0300, David Edmundson
> :
>
>
>> As you're all probably aware I've been working on a new login manager
>> for KDE [1]. Currently known as LightDM-KDE, named as it is based on
>> the display manager backen
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 9:50 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> El Dimecres, 22 d'agost de 2012, a les 13:58:57, David Edmundson va escriure:
>> As you're all probably aware I've been working on a new login manager
>> for KDE [1]. Currently known as LightDM-KDE, named as it is based on
>> the display
On Wednesday 22 August 2012 20:44:00 Sune Vuorela wrote:
> From my personal view and as a packager, I would say "we only need *one*
> display manager in the workspace". So, if lightdm comes, then KDM must
> go in my opinion.
No, LightDM-KDE and KDM solve different problems. KDM is a full-blown disp
2012/8/22 Albert Astals Cid :
> El Dimecres, 22 d'agost de 2012, a les 13:58:57, David Edmundson va escriure:
>> As you're all probably aware I've been working on a new login manager
>> for KDE [1]. Currently known as LightDM-KDE, named as it is based on
>> the display manager backend LightDM [2].
El Dimecres, 22 d'agost de 2012, a les 13:58:57, David Edmundson va escriure:
> As you're all probably aware I've been working on a new login manager
> for KDE [1]. Currently known as LightDM-KDE, named as it is based on
> the display manager backend LightDM [2].
How's the upstream of ligthdm? Hav
On 2012-08-22, David Edmundson wrote:
> release. This isn't a decision forced by Canonical, they just think
> it's better, though obviously it helps that the backend is already
> tested on Ubuntu. Other distributions have also expressed an interest,
Is LightDM a canonical project? one that is cov
написане Wed, 22 Aug 2012 15:58:57 +0300, David Edmundson
:
As you're all probably aware I've been working on a new login manager
for KDE [1]. Currently known as LightDM-KDE, named as it is based on
the display manager backend LightDM [2].
I'm sure many of you will have questions "why wa
As you're all probably aware I've been working on a new login manager
for KDE [1]. Currently known as LightDM-KDE, named as it is based on
the display manager backend LightDM [2].
I've just released 0.3, and it's mature enough that Kubuntu are
choosing to have it as their default display manager i
25 matches
Mail list logo
