Re: Facebook Flint vis-à-vis Krazy

2014-12-10 Thread viv...@gmail.com
Il 02/12/2014 21:40, Allen Winter ha scritto: > Howdy, > > Today I was informed that Facebook has a tool similar in concept to Krazy, > called Flint [1] > > You might want to read [1] and let me know if there are any checkers listed > there that > you'd like to see added to Krazy. Krazy already

Re: Updating our tools

2014-09-24 Thread viv...@gmail.com
Il 24/09/2014 16:13, Allen Winter ha scritto: > > Yes that's all on my plate. > I have it on my todo list. > Krazy should be kde5 ready , I just need to plug it in and turn it on. > > I don't recall if there were any blockers, or if I simply got distracted on > something else. > > The associated c

Re: Moving Baloo forward

2014-01-27 Thread viv...@gmail.com
On 01/26/14 00:38, Matthew Dawson wrote: > On January 25, 2014 10:02:09 PM Thomas Lübking wrote: >> On Samstag, 25. Januar 2014 21:03:44 CEST, Matthew Dawson wrote: >>> At least for ext4, xattrs are the default mode >> Indeed - removed user_xattr and they're still there. >> >> Do you happen to know

Re: Moving Baloo forward

2014-01-21 Thread viv...@gmail.com
On 01/21/14 13:22, Vishesh Handa wrote: > On Tuesday 21 January 2014 13:06:40 viv...@gmail.com wrote: >> On 01/21/14 11:50, Vishesh Handa wrote: >>> On Tuesday 21 January 2014 02:24:01 Francesco R. wrote: >>>> just always use an additional database, xattrs are no

Re: Moving Baloo forward

2014-01-21 Thread viv...@gmail.com
On 01/21/14 11:50, Vishesh Handa wrote: > On Tuesday 21 January 2014 02:24:01 Francesco R. wrote: >> just always use an additional database, xattrs are not the way to go. >> Managing xattrs require a conscious user, many programs by default don't >> even copy xattrs. >> > I disagree. It'll be easie

Re: New lockscreen

2013-01-11 Thread viv...@gmail.com
Il 10/01/2013 21:57, Aaron J. Seigo ha scritto: [...] disclaimer: i am not the maintainer of this component. i have contributed some minor things to its development. however, i'm obviously vested in the workspace in general. reverting is not going to happen at this point. but what i will do is s

Re: Compiler version

2012-06-28 Thread viv...@gmail.com
Il 28/06/2012 16:31, Thiago Macieira ha scritto: On quinta-feira, 28 de junho de 2012 14.38.37, viv...@gmail.com wrote: actually for stability and feature related to c++11 gcc-4.7 is nearly the minimum, but in my experience gcc-4.7 is still a bit rough so +1 for gcc-4.6 That's nonsense.

Re: Compiler version

2012-06-28 Thread viv...@gmail.com
Il 27/06/2012 23:41, Martin Gräßlin ha scritto: On Wednesday 27 June 2012 23:28:30 Ivan Čukić wrote: Hi all, I've tested the waters some time ago [1] what would people say if we started asking for more modern compilers. I've stated there I'll start the discussion on k-c-d once we branch out 4.9