helmed by the changes for KF5. Today I'm unfortunately forced
to use the Qt version. Perhaps we should stick with that version and
simply have it hosted and maintained as a KDE extragear project.
--
Valentin Rusu
IRC: valir
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125056/#review88111
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Valentin Rusu
On Oct. 26, 2015, 2:20
* Luigi Toscano [2015-06-14 13:32:26 +0200]:
> Valentin Rusu ha scritto:
>
> > The kwallet-query tool is now part of KF5::Wallet. I'll now request
> > kdereview/kwallet-query repository removal.
>
> src/runtime/kwallet-query/src/querydriver.cpp:153:47: error: ‘clas
* Valentin Rusu [2015-05-29 22:32:46 +0200]:
> * David Narvaez [2015-05-28 09:53:55 -0400]:
>
> > On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Valentin Rusu wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Seems to me that quite some time passed since my request and nobody
>
* David Narvaez [2015-05-28 09:53:55 -0400]:
> On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Valentin Rusu wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Seems to me that quite some time passed since my request and nobody
> > replied. Perhaps kde-utils is not the right place to pu
Hello,
Seems to me that quite some time passed since my request and nobody
replied. Perhaps kde-utils is not the right place to put this small
utility in?
Alternatively, I could include it in the runtime part of KWallet
framework.
What would be right choice?
* Valentin Rusu [2015-05-03 23:17
Hello Raphael,
The two weeks review period elapsed and meanwhile I did all the
suggested changes to the kwallet-query utility project.
This utility may now be included into kdeutils.
Do you agree with this inclusion? May I file the corresponding sysadmin
request?
Thanks,
* Valentin Rusu
* Allen Winter [2015-04-23 17:32:32 -0400]:
> On Thursday, April 23, 2015 10:25:20 PM Valentin Rusu wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > This is a rather simple script and I think it should go to kde-utils.
> > I'd like to write a manpage for it, buy AFAICT that&#
* Scott Kitterman [2015-04-23 17:10:12 -0400]:
> Also, please add COPYING.LIB for LGPL 2, since that's the license you're
> using
> for the project.
Added!
--
Valentin Rusu
IRC: valir
* Allen Winter [2015-04-23 17:32:32 -0400]:
> On Thursday, April 23, 2015 10:25:20 PM Valentin Rusu wrote:
> > This is a rather simple script and I think it should go to kde-utils.
> > I'd like to write a manpage for it, buy AFAICT that's not the KDE way of
> > do
Thanks for the review!
* Albert Astals Cid [2015-04-23 22:55:17 +0200]:
> El Dijous, 23 d'abril de 2015, a les 22:25:20, Valentin Rusu va escriure:
> > This is a rather simple script and I think it should go to kde-utils.
> > I'd like to write a manpage for it, buy AFAI
e for it, buy AFAICT that's not the KDE way of
doing it. On the other hand, the target users would not need the
handbook, in my opinion. But I may be wrong.
PS:
I3 users may also be interested about this:
https://github.com/valir/kwallet-dmenu
--
Valentin Rusu
IRC: valir
On 11/08/14 00:23:15, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> Any objection?
None from me. That would make it clear for everybody that the
applications should start using KF5.
>
> Cheers,
> Albert
ames,
> > since apparently
> > those are stored unencrypted, if the API docs are to be believed.
>
> Apparently is is changed with KSS and I frankly would have hoped that only
> hashes are stored for this test?
Only hashes are stored for this test - see my answer next to this mes
On Thursday, April 03, 2014 08:42:32 PM Michael Pyne wrote:
> On Fri, April 4, 2014 02:20:28 Valentin Rusu wrote:
> > On Sunday, March 30, 2014 05:25:58 PM Michael Pyne wrote:
> > > In fact the list of folders and keys present in KWallet (though
> > > not their val
rate more on the possibility to enumerate the keys
without opening the wallet?
--
Valentin Rusu
irc: valir
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Hello,
Catching up with KF5 progress...
On Tuesday, March 04, 2014 04:59:58 PM Kevin Ottens wrote:
> * Repository merges for kwallet and kdnssd still reported as pending...
What's that? Is that about merging 4.xx repository with the KF5 one?
> * afiestas has kwallet patches in need of review
ed March 2, 2014, 11:33 p.m.)
>
>
> Review request for KDE Runtime, Release Team and Valentin Rusu.
>
>
> Repository: kde-runtime
>
>
> Description
> ---
>
> This patch adds support for pam-kwallet (in my scratch right now, to be
> released soon).
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116555/#review52218
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Valentin Rusu
On March 2, 2014, 11:33
, feel free to commit it!
- Valentin Rusu
On Feb. 10, 2014, 5:43 p.m., Àlex Fiestas wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.
tps://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115497/#comment34903>
The error logic should be more strict here, I think. In fact we loose the
"unknown version" return code.
- Valentin Rusu
On Feb. 10, 2014, 5:43 p.m., Àlex Fiestas wrote:
>
> --
------
>
> (Updated Feb. 10, 2014, 5:43 p.m.)
>
>
> Review request for KDE Runtime, Teo Mrnjavac and Valentin Rusu.
>
>
> Repository: kde-runtime
>
>
> Description
> ---
>
> Uses the MINOR_VERSIO
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115497/#review49485
---
- Valentin Rusu
On Feb. 10, 2014, 5:43 p.m., Àlex Fiestas
On Tuesday, January 28, 2014 04:40:51 PM Kevin Ottens wrote:
> * teo is planning to help on the kwallet and secret service front;
> * he's waiting to hear back from valentin rusu;
teo already contacted me, suggesting IRC meeting during working hours.
Unfortunately, I won't b
On 08/17/2013 03:31 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> El Dissabte, 17 d'agost de 2013, a les 14:22:35, Valentin Rusu va escriure:
>> Hello,
>>
>> kwalletd now supports GPG encryption. The code is fully functional, at
>> least on my system, and I pushed it to the kwall
On 08/28/2013 07:05 PM, Christoph Feck wrote:
> On Saturday 24 August 2013 12:31:20 Valentin Rusu wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Now that frameworks splitting is almost done ;-) with some people
>> even running KF5-based sessions on their systems, I'd like to plan
>>
On 08/24/2013 01:43 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> El Dissabte, 24 d'agost de 2013, a les 12:31:20, Valentin Rusu va escriure:
>>
>> * Another piece of software related to kwallet is KWalletManager from
>> kdeutils. I think that component should also be detached from kdeu
On 08/24/2013 02:32 PM, Kevin Krammer wrote:
> On Saturday, 2013-08-24, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
>> El Dissabte, 24 d'agost de 2013, a les 12:31:20, Valentin Rusu va escriure:
>>>
>>> * AFAIK, frameworks should be independent and self-contained. kwallet
>>&
l for a quick reply on these topics.
Regards,
--
Valentin Rusu (IRC valir, KDE vrusu)
KSecretsService (former KSecretService, KWallet replacement)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
uld I use
reviewboard for this feature, knowing that's best to actually clone and
run the code in order to test it, and reviewboard only let us read the code?
Regards,
--
Valentin Rusu (IRC valir, KDE vrusu)
KSecretsService (former KSecretService, KWallet replacement)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
n the day ?
> At 4pm I'm at work, and so can't attend.
Same for me. At 4pm I'm at work. And my regular job is not for KDE ;-)
--
Valentin Rusu (vrusu)
IRC: valir
Kopete otr plugin.
I think tat a more elegant output message would state :
* libotr (3.2.0 to 4.0.0)
But the macro does not have a _maxVersion parameter. How about adding it?
Would it be OK to add such a parameter?
--
Valentin Rusu (vrusu)
IRC: valir
r.
KSecrets is on hold and I was asked to help with KF5 development. I'll resume
it's development when I'll get a working KF5-based environement. The plug-in
approach was OK, but why develop something for a platform set ready for
deprecation?
--
Valentin Rusu (vrusu)
IRC: va
oring out in time for 4.11.
Best regards,
--
Valentin Rusu (vrusu)
IRC: valir
KSecretsService (aka KSecretService, KWallet replacement)
On Tuesday 12 February 2013 14:10:23 Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
> Le Wednesday 06 February 2013 23:14:59 Valentin Rusu a écrit :
> > > Thanks, I understand it better now. Assuming it was also possible to
> > > get
> > > a list of the authorized applications, I
On Sunday 03 February 2013 17:50:05 Andrei Sebastian Cîmpean wrote:
On Sunday 03 February 2013 16:40:04 Anders Lund wrote:
> Søndag den 3. februar 2013 14:50:33 skrev Valentin Rusu:
> Great to get rid of that extra window! What I think is why even the
> graphical representation of it?
an exception, but I don't remember if we decided to do it or not.
Well, it was decided to look to the future, and to bring this to KF5.
Currently there are no plans to put this new feature in KDE4.x
--
Valentin Rusu (vrusu)
IRC: valir
KSecretsService (aka KSecretService, KWallet replacement)
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108237/#review27022
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Valentin Rusu
On Jan. 21, 2013, 10:35
On Wednesday 06 February 2013 14:28:17 Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
> On 05.02.2013 21:34, Valentin Rusu wrote:
> >>
> >> I assumed the "Disconnect" button listed applications authorized to
> >> access
> >> the wallet. The "Authorized applications&q
applications connected to the current
wallet and build from it the popup menu under the "disconnect" button.
>
> > Finally, here is my slightly adjusted sketch version:
> > http://www.rusu.info/kwalletmanager/
>
> As you said, this looks closely like my second version :)
Nice!
--
Valentin Rusu (vrusu)
IRC: valir
KSecretsService (aka KSecretService, KWallet replacement)
On Monday 04 February 2013 22:08:49 Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
> Le Monday 04 February 2013 20:55:12 Albert Astals Cid a écrit :
> > El Dilluns, 4 de febrer de 2013, a les 19:28:42, Aurélien Gâteau va
>
> escriure:
> > > Le Sunday 03 February 2013 14:50:33 Valentin Rusu a écr
On Monday 04 February 2013 19:28:42 Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
> Le Sunday 03 February 2013 14:50:33 Valentin Rusu a écrit :
> > A screen capture is far better than a hundred words so here it is:
> > http://imgur.com/MD3GDxO
>
> Hey,
>
> Nice work!
Thanks!
>
uick use cases. I'd think in
> the long run that would be the best solution for all.
The wallet manager is not necessary to run in background. As a matter of fact,
it's even not needed most of the time. For that to happen, it's enough to
uncheck the "show manager in s
On Sunday 03 February 2013 13:34:24 Michael Pyne wrote:
> On Sunday, February 03, 2013 14:50:33 Valentin Rusu wrote:
> >
> > During last days I finally sat down and did a ui-refactor and now
> > kwalletmanager handles all the wallets inside a single, KPageWidget based
> &g
(so the systray icon is disabled, but that's afaik not the
> default, is it?)
Yes, that's not the default, but one could disable the tray icon in wallet
system settings.
Cheers,
--
Valentin Rusu (vrusu)
IRC: valir
KSecretsService (aka KSecretService, KWallet replacement)
On Sunday 03 February 2013 16:40:04 Anders Lund wrote:
> Søndag den 3. februar 2013 14:50:33 skrev Valentin Rusu:
> >
> > During last days I finally sat down and did a ui-refactor and now
> > kwalletmanager handles all the wallets inside a single, KPageWidget based
> >
I need your precious feedback
- implementing features you may suggest
- update the handbook
- merge the code to the main branch when decided
Thanks,
PS I'd like to say a big *thank you* to the *gammaray* team who did a really
great tool that showed very handy when analysing existing ui layout.
-
p with no issues, on my system.
Cheers,
Albert
Cheers,
El Diumenge, 28 d'octubre de 2012, a les 19:42:29, Valentin Rusu va escriure:
[2] http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-utils-devel/2011-November/000705.html
--
Valentin Rusu (IRC valir, KDE vrusu)
KSecretsService (former KSecretService, KWallet replacement)
On 10/28/2012 08:43 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
On domingo, 28 de outubro de 2012 19.42.29, Valentin Rusu wrote:
Any thoughts about this?
Yes: why do you need plugins?
From the description, you could do both with simple classes inside the
library.
Unless you need to link to the secret
kde-utils-devel/2011-November/000705.html
[3] This is the only way I managed to do that. Connecting signals did
not work as some forum threads suggest.
--
Valentin Rusu (IRC valir, KDE vrusu)
KSecretsService (former KSecretService, KWallet replacement)
end/secret/service.cpp
ksecretsserviced/frontend/tests/servicetest.cpp
Regards,
Jakub
[1] : http://standards.freedesktop.org/secret-service/re02.html
--
Valentin Rusu (IRC valir, KDE vrusu)
KSecretsService (former KSecretService, KWallet replacement)
but
hopefully I'll have more time for it one that "real life" project would
let me more energy.
Aurélien
[1]: http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Specifications/secret-storage-spec
--
Valentin Rusu (IRC valir, KDE vrusu)
KSecretsService (former KSecretService, KWallet replacement)
set authenticate IXO13IqM
set delivery off
us to. Thanks for that. And I can
tell I'm far from having a precise plan about KAction merge. But I'll try to
have one in a couple of weeks.
--
Valentin Rusu (vrusu)
IRC: valir
KSecretsService (aka KSecretService, KWallet replacement)
.
Cheers,
--
Valentin Rusu (IRC valir, KDE vrusu)
KSecretsService (former KSecretService, KWallet replacement)
me this infrastructure was intended from the beginning to go
inside the frameworks.
Valentin
--
Valentin Rusu (IRC valir, KDE vrusu)
KSecretsService (former KSecretService, KWallet replacement)
On 11/14/2011 09:19 PM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
Valentin: please let me know when ksecretservice is in its own repo,
I just removed ksecretsservice from kdelibs and kde-runtime.
Next move will be inclusion in ksecrets repository.
--
Valentin Rusu (IRC valir, KDE vrusu)
KSecretsService (former
rvice is in its own repo,
and i'll take care of the kwallet integration ... technically it's a
new feature that'll be dropping into 4.8's kdelibs, but it's a
reasonable compromise imho.
Ok, works for me.
i will commit it after the 4.7.4 release so as not to interfer
On 11/14/2011 06:04 PM, Kevin Ottens wrote:
On Saturday 12 November 2011 11:35:22 Valentin Rusu wrote:
And the circular dependency will be there as long as kdecore (where
KCompositeJob lives) and kdeui (where KWallet lives) are tied together.
Here is the schema :
- KWallet legacy code *needs
should we make this mistake
again?
Ok, I'll then move it somewhere else. I'm very tempted by the kdecore
module, the place where it's main dependency, KCompositeJob, lives.
But I think the best place would be the *experimental* module. Ok for that?
--
Valentin Rusu (IRC v
correct, thanks Alex.
However, I should remove the ksecretsserviced from kde-runtime and let
it go the the ksecrets repository, under kdeutils. And I'll do it later
today.
--
Valentin Rusu (IRC valir, KDE vrusu)
KSecretsService (former KSecretService, KWallet replacement)
e API should be compiled first, but that requires
KCompositeJob.
--
Valentin Rusu (IRC valir, KDE vrusu)
KSecretsService (former KSecretService, KWallet replacement)
On 11/12/2011 10:11 AM, Kevin Ottens wrote:
On Saturday 12 November 2011 01:01:15 Valentin Rusu wrote:
As you may already know, the ksecretsservice API merging to the
kdelibs/4.7 branch was no longer an acceptable solution because of
recent frameworks related decisions. It was suggested to put
ll not have the ksecretsservice-related code.
That looks like a circular reference :-) I'll discuss this on the next
frameworks irc meeting or maybe a solution for this kind of situation
already exists?
Cheers,
--
Valentin Rusu (IRC valir, KDE vrusu)
KSecretsService (former KSecretService, KWallet replacement)
use the old repo, as it's name
is slightly different,
- documentint it on techbase.kde.org site
--
Valentin Rusu (IRC valir, KDE vrusu)
KSecretsService (former KSecretService, KWallet replacement)
On 11/11/2011 09:52 AM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
On Friday, November 11, 2011 00:26:23 Valentin Rusu wrote:
Please be informed that KSecretsService components were included into
the main repositories as follows:
evidently there was a failure somewhere, and i'll take responsibility for it
be
On 11/11/2011 03:06 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
On Friday, 11 de November de 2011 00.26.23, Valentin Rusu wrote:
Hello,
Please be informed that KSecretsService components were included into
the main repositories as follows:
*kdelibs/kdeui/ksecretsservice*
API intented for the applications
utilities related to KSecretsService
I'll prepare more documentation on techbase and community for this.
Looking forward for the bug reports :-)
PS: youpi!
--
Valentin Rusu (IRC valir, KDE vrusu)
KSecretsService (former KSecretService, KWallet replacement)
On 11/10/2011 10:30 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
On Thursday 10 November 2011, Valentin Rusu wrote:
Hello,
I just pushed the new API to kdelibs and kdepepo (Christoph Feck) has an
IRC inquiry I find right.
This new API's location was initially guided by the KWallet API
location, th
s) it will be more difficult.
Possible locations might be:
1. kdelibs/kdecore/ksecretsservice
2. kdelibs/kutils/ksecretsservice
Any thoughts?
--
Valentin Rusu (IRC valir, KDE vrusu)
KSecretsService (former KSecretService, KWallet replacement)
Hello Olivier,
Now that the KSecretsService API joined kdelibs, branch 4.7, I'm now
preparing to move the ksecretsserviced from the playground to kde-runtime.
The review request was posted several days ago @kde-core-devel.
Cheers,
--
Valentin Rusu (IRC valir, KDE vrusu)
KSecretsSe
FYI
Original Message
Subject: [Bug 286298] New: Please move ksecrets repo from kdereview to
"KDE Utils"
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 20:46:40 +0000
From: Valentin Rusu
Reply-To: bug-cont...@bugs.kde.org
To: k...@rusu.info
https://bugs.kde.org/show_
On 11/10/2011 01:00 AM, Valentin Rusu wrote:
On 11/10/2011 12:48 AM, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
* createItem falls in the "let's use a bool instead of an enum
because it>
just have two values" trap for the replace parameter
Well, I don't agree. When prese
On 11/10/2011 12:48 AM, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
A Dijous, 10 de novembre de 2011, Valentin Rusu vàreu escriure:
Hello Albert,
Thanks for the thourough review.
On 11/09/2011 03:26 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
This is scary, last time i used kwallet, i had to add a single line, and
now there
Hello Albert,
Thanks for the thourough review.
On 11/09/2011 03:26 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
A Dimarts, 8 de novembre de 2011, Valentin Rusu vàreu escriure:
Hello Again,
The freeze will come in less thant two days now and I'd like to know if
anyone reviewed these components.
Thanks
herUrl
Ok, I also fixed getServiceLauncherUrl
- Valentin
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103085/#review8032
---
On Nov. 8, 2011,
requests (waitForPid=0) at
/home/kde/work/kdelibs/kinit/kinit.cpp:1419
#55 0x0040a803 in main (argc=4, argv=0x7fff0c2c5028,
envp=0x7fff0c2c5050) at /home/kde/work/kdelibs/kinit/kinit.cpp:1907
Diffs
-
libs/taskmanager/taskitem.cpp d3c336d
Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103085/diff/diff
Testing
---
This one is not easy to reproduce.
Thanks,
Valentin Rusu
Hello Again,
The freeze will come in less thant two days now and I'd like to know if
anyone reviewed these components.
Thanks,
On 10/31/2011 11:48 PM, Valentin Rusu wrote:
Hello,
Please be advised three repostories need review before integration
into the next release:
1. /kder
n
is done right (I'll take care of that).
Thanks for your comments (any comments),
--
Valentin Rusu (IRC valir, KDE vrusu)
KSecretsService (former KSecretService, KWallet replacement)
On 10/31/2011 01:01 PM, Allen Winter wrote:
[Release Team added to the discussion]
[also adding kde-core]
On Sunday 30 October 2011 5:09:47 PM Valentin Rusu wrote:
Hello,
May I ask some quesions about this announcement please? This is the
first time I'll hopefully get some software i
already fought the namespace issue ;-)
--
Valentin Rusu (IRC valir, KDE vrusu)
KSecretsService (former KSecretService, KWallet replacement)
On 10/16/2011 03:30 PM, Will Stephenson wrote:
On Wednesday 12 October 2011 00:24:00 Valentin Rusu wrote:
Any thoughts?
This all sounds good. A couple of questions:
1) Are the KWallet API changes additions, or will some parts of the kwallet
api be deprecated? If so, when do you plan to add
On 10/13/2011 10:28 PM, Martin Koller wrote:
On Wednesday, 12. October 2011 01:09:51 Valentin Rusu wrote:
I personally have been looking forward to KSecretsService and I like
the idea of leaving KSecretsService unused by default for now, but it
should at least be stressed to downstream to
lt with the next
2012 release.
Anyway that is just my 2cents, and I will follow whatever decision you
make. You are a better judge of the quality of KSecretsService than me
:)
Kool
--
Valentin Rusu (IRC valir, KDE vrusu)
KSecretsService (former KSecretService, KWallet replacement)
allet has a branch containing code specific to
ksecretsservice (e.g. the checkbox to activate ksecretsservice
infrastructure). This branch should also be merged when releasing 4.8.
Any thoughts?
--
Valentin Rusu (IRC valir, KDE vrusu)
KSecretsService (former KSecretService, KWallet replacement)
Indeed, that would have the same result. And if I just tested correctly that
> is already the default behaviour with KDE 4.7? I am still at 4.6 for my main
> system, so I did not notice that this was changed... sorry.
Now, that I committed Ralf's proposed solution, I'd like to kno
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102714/#review6847
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Valentin Rusu
On Sept. 26, 2011, 7:59
On 08/21/2011 09:31 AM, todd rme wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 12:09 AM, Valentin Rusu wrote:
>> On 08/20/2011 02:11 PM, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
>>>> A cross-desktop specification, but we still use kwallet. There's no reason
>>>> to
>>>> dum
of the daemon exposing fd.o secrets specification currently
under development).
--
Valentin Rusu (IRC valir, KDE vrusu)
KSecretsService (former KSecretService, KWallet replacement)
I want it! I'll implement kwallet and new ksecretsservice tools on it!
:-)
Valentin Rusu (valir)
KSecretsService (KWallet replacement)
Bernhard Reiter wrote:
Anyone that deserves or wants a free N900 from the KDE or KDE PIM community?
Am Montag, 18. Juli 2011 11:45:14 schrieb Bernhard R
On 08/01/2011 03:19 PM, Allen Winter wrote:
> On Sunday 31 July 2011 6:19:20 PM Valentin Rusu wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'd like to get the KSecretsService code checked by Krazy.
[snip]
> In playground/base (SVN) create a file called .krazy with the line:
> EXTRASUB
Hello Sebas :-)
On 08/04/2011 09:51 AM, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> Hi Valentino,
>
> [snip]
>> One more component should be the KWallet backend, an implementation of
>> the current KWallet class based on the new "Client API". KWallet code is
>> actually spread inside several GIT repositories: kdeli
Hello,
KSecretsService API is now nearing the finished state. But this would be
confirmed by starting using it as a KWallet API backend. Naturally, I'll
do this on my system but I'd like to do it such that:
- allow for current kdelibs modularization efforts,
- allow volunteers to test this new fea
Hello,
I'd like to get the KSecretsService code checked by Krazy. It's living
in projects.kde.org/playground/base and Krazy seems ignoring it :
http://www.englishbreakfastnetwork.org/krazy/index.php?component=playground&module=base
At the time of svn.kde.org, a simple add_subdirectory macro in th
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101583/
---
(Updated June 11, 2011, 9:33 p.m.)
Review request for kdelibs.
Summary (
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101583/
---
Review request for kdelibs.
Summary
---
KLineEdit : Clear selected te
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101577/#review3830
---
Ship it!
Looks ok.
- Valentin
On June 10, 2011, 8:34 p.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101560/#review3810
---
Ship it!
I checked kdirlister.cpp and itemsForDir truely can re
98 matches
Mail list logo
