Sure. First thing tomorrow.
/Cheers
Torgny
Original message From: Albert Astals Cid
Date:2014/07/14 19:32 (GMT+01:00) To:
Vishesh Handa Cc: kde-de...@kde.org,kde-packager
,KDE release coordination ,kdelibs
,torgny nyblom Subject: Re:
4.13.3 tarballs are available for
On Monday 14 July 2014 21.01.41 Torgny Nyblom wrote:
> Sure. First thing tomorrow.
baloo is now respun.
commit 918ec9d265c315bed4313963c3be58fd748fe26a
sha256: c7467bf518dc23e319b581dbc1dff84cd8d0b03516a1d25bde0aa0cd7bbad043
/Regards
Torgny
>
> /Cheers
> Torgny
>
> ---
On Saturday 23 November 2013 17.58.31 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> Hi,
>
> for very happy personal reasons (since Tuesday, named David :-) ) I'll have
> significantly less time for KDE in the future.
>From one who know what it's like, your life will never be the same :)
Congratulations!!
/Torgny
Hi,
What is the policy of depending on unreleased libraries? And is that written
down somewhere?
Reason I'm asking is this commit
http://build.kde.org/view/FAILED/job/libkdcraw_master/83/changes#detail1
It introduces a dependency to libraw 0.16 witch is not released.
/Regards
Torgny
On Friday 26 July 2013 23.53.07 Michael Pyne wrote:
> On Fri, July 26, 2013 21:11:21 Torgny Nyblom wrote:
> > On Thursday 25 July 2013 18.24.50 Michael Pyne wrote:
> > > The 'logical module groups' might play a role in the release process
> > > after
> >
On Thursday 25 July 2013 18.24.50 Michael Pyne wrote:
> On Thu, July 25, 2013 22:44:47 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > El Dimecres, 24 de juliol de 2013, a les 23:05:55, Michael Pyne va
escriure:
> > > On Fri, July 19, 2013 00:21:21 you wrote:
> > > > After more live discussion with Sebas and Marco p
(Missed k-c-d)
On Monday 18 June 2012 19.08.33 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> El Dilluns, 18 de juny de 2012, a les 06:36:33, Martin Gräßlin va escriure:
> > On Monday 18 June 2012 00:26:13 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > > My concerns:
> > > * Need more people to do the tarball packaging/releasing (sinc
://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103148/diff/diff
Testing
---
Builds ok
Thanks,
Torgny Nyblom
On Tuesday 11 October 2011 20.54.42 Thomas Lübking wrote:
> Am Tue, 11 Oct 2011 18:02:32 +0200
>
> schrieb Torgny Nyblom :
> > Screensaver is bling only
>
> No, "screensaver hacks are bling only", a "screensaver" is a
> software relic.
(Semantics)
&g
On Tuesday 11 October 2011 21.11.03 Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 October 2011 20:12:39 Torgny Nyblom wrote:
[...]
> > But you also said that the screensaver without locking was going away in
> > 4.9. This is what I'm against.
>
> As Thomas wrote you will
On Tuesday 11 October 2011 19.52.36 Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 October 2011 18:02:32 Torgny Nyblom wrote:
> > On Tuesday 11 October 2011 15.55.15 you wrote:
> > > Am Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:33:39 +0200
> > >
> > > schrieb Torgny Nyblom :
> > >
On Tuesday 11 October 2011 15.55.15 you wrote:
> Am Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:33:39 +0200
>
> schrieb Torgny Nyblom :
> > Does this mean that I will be focred to use a screensaver with
> > password unlock? If so why is that not a vaild usecase? It's what I
> > use at h
On Tuesday 11 October 2011 14.55.29 Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> On Monday 10 October 2011 20:02:07 Parker Coates wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 14:02, Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > > I want to request a security audit for the changes to ensure that
> > > the new implementation is as secure as the existi
re. I have said the
> possibility of creating NEW profiles will be removed. Profile switching
> upon battery events will still be retained and will be looking exactly as
> it looks today.
Ok, so the possibility of changing settings of the preset profiles will stay?
--
/Regards
Torgny Ny
.
+1
Please do not force me to use activites to set power management options.
Also please do not remove the possibility to change how a certain state should
look like. So far I've always changed the "on battery" profile.
/Regards
Torgny Nyblom
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Friday 16 September 2011 15.09.49 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
[...]
> Please update the stable i18n branch settings in projects.kde.org
Done, sorry for forgetting that.
/Torgny
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Thursday 08 September 2011 20.37.59 Jeremy Whiting wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Sorry for the cross post, but this concerns many and I want to make
> sure everyone is aware.
[...]
> Thus I propose we agree to use KDE/X.Y for official kde release branches
> going forward. In one week (Sep 15th) perf
On Tue, 23 Aug 2011 08:15:50 +0200, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
On Monday, August 22, 2011 11:33:49 Jeremy Whiting wrote:
Was this decided upon at some point? I got conflicting stories
fromsysadmin
and other developers. Yesterday after migrating kdeaccessibilityto
git I
was asked by a sysadmin to r
On Friday 19 August 2011 20.54.21 Harald Sitter wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 6:54 PM, Lukas Appelhans wrote:
> > I guess there were no efforts yet from the kdemultimedia team to make the
> > move.
> I did not realize we had to take care of the move seems a bit
> inconvenient.
Who should d
On Tuesday 16 August 2011 19.48.39 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
[...]
> There are currently several parties interested in running builds/test.
> There is you working on Jenkins, Volker is working on setting up virtual
> machines so users can do builds in a seti@home style, and Marcus is trying
> to se
On Monday 15 August 2011 23.31.26 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
[...]
> -
> 8) Testing
> -
>
> We shortly discussed testing, continuous builds and nightly builds.
> I hope Volker (or somebody) can write a better summary.
>
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101575/#review5719
---
Any progress?
- Torgny
On June 10, 2011, 9:18 p.m., John Layt
On Wednesday 08 June 2011 19.03.01 Cornelius Schumacher wrote:
> As you already know, we have discussed the git workflow for KDE at the
> Platform 11 sprint, and have come up with a recommendation. Please find the
> full text here: http://community.kde.org/KDE_Core/Platform_11/Git_Workflow
"""
Loc
> On Thursday, May 12, 2011 14:38:57 Torgny Nyblom wrote:
>> On Tuesday 10 May 2011 10.04.34 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
[...]
> Shaun gave the location; it's still experimental for us, though. We're
> using
> it for the next three months of plasma development, with a focus o
On Tuesday 10 May 2011 10.04.34 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> we have already been putting together plans, including documenting them
> feature by feature in iceScrum
For those of us who this is the first time we hear about icsscrum where is it,
who can use it and for what?
/Regards
Torgny
On Tuesday 26 April 2011 15.52.18 John Layt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Did anything come out from discussions on feature branch naming in git?
> With GSoC starting soon we'll be getting a lot of new feature branches and
> it would be nice if they were consistantly named to make them easy to find
> and mana
On Thursday 21 April 2011 21.25.13 Ian Monroe wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 06:56, Stefan Majewsky
>
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > what is the technical procedure for moving libtagaro.git to kdereview?
> > I think sysadmins need be informed, and hope that those are reading
> > here.
> >
> > Assum
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/6014/#review10017
---
Closing as it seems abandoned and involved repos are in git now.
On Monday 31 January 2011 10.30.50 Ian Monroe wrote:
[...]
> *We need to have a unified branch naming scheme. Basically we need to
> come up with what we want the branches to be named, and then ask the
> sysadmin team to rename them for us.
>
> In use I think the 'KDE/' prefix is a bad idea, since
On Sunday 30 January 2011 21.11.25 Ian Monroe wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 08:58, Torgny Nyblom wrote:
> > On Sunday 30 January 2011 14.38.17 Tom Albers wrote:
> >> - Original Message -
> >>
> >> > On 1/30/2011 1:17 PM, Marco Martin wrote:
On Sunday 30 January 2011 14.38.17 Tom Albers wrote:
> - Original Message -
>
> > On 1/30/2011 1:17 PM, Marco Martin wrote:
> > > in the runtime repository, the "pics" directory doesn't seem
> > > available, but
> > > the main CMakelist.txt still looks for it.
> >
> > kde-runtime is curre
On Saturday 29 January 2011 02.28.35 Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
> Torgny Nyblom wrote:
> > On Friday 28 January 2011 16.13.31 Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
> >> The kdebase-runtime repository is currently 260MB, and
> >> kdebase-workspace
> >> is 300MB. Apparently it'
On Friday 28 January 2011 16.13.31 Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
> Ian Monroe wrote:
> > For up to one week if someone finds a major problem in the history a
> > re-push will be considered. After that we'll just live with it.
> >
> > ...but far better would be for any problem to be found now. Please
> >
On Friday 28 January 2011 13.47.55 Torgny Nyblom wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've just finnished pushing the kdepimlibs module to git
> (https://projects.kde.org/projects/kde/kdepimlibs/).
kdepimlibs now lives in git
(https://projects.kde.org/projects/kde/kdepimlibs/)!
/Regards
Torgny
On Friday 28 January 2011 11.05.43 Johannes Sixt wrote:
> Am 1/28/2011 10:31, schrieb Torgny Nyblom:
> > On Friday 28 January 2011 00.06.21 Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
> >> John Tapsell wrote:
> >>> 2011/1/27 Nicolás Alvarez :
> >>>> Please, help review
On Friday 28 January 2011 00.06.21 Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
> John Tapsell wrote:
> > 2011/1/27 Nicolás Alvarez :
> >> Please, help review the repositories before migration! Unlike KDE
> >> software, here we won't have point releases to fix bugs later :)
> >
> > I have quite a few commits in kdebase
ced with a README.
>
> *Both* the 4.6 and trunk branches are moving.
Please not that this applies to kdepimlibs aswell.
/Regards
Torgny Nyblom
On Friday 21 January 2011 22.44.49 Ben Cooksley wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > On Thursday, January 20, 2011, Ben Cooksley wrote:
> >> Correct, it is Gerrit which is a more git based alternative to
> >> Reviewboard. http://code.google.com/p/gerrit/
> >
> > do
On Sat, 1 Jan 2011 21:25:23 + (UTC)
Tom Albers wrote:
[...]
> 40 kdelibs-bugs
> 28 plasma-bugs
If no one who actually use these lists step up I can try and take them.
/Torgny
On Thursday 30 December 2010 17.55.35 Milian Wolff wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I want to bring this topic to discussion. As developer of KDevelop and Kate
> I'm forced to jump through hoops to get code by new contributors in.
>
> Right now the workflow is like this:
>
> - new contributor says he has a
40 matches
Mail list logo
