> On Nov. 9, 2011, 8:50 p.m., Christoph Feck wrote:
> > It's already fixed, at least in master. The patch is wrong, too, because
> > that signal doesn't exists in QSpinBox. Looks like you did not test it :)
>
> Christoph Feck wrote:
> Sorry, I failed reading, forget what I wrote.
>
>
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102671/
---
(Updated Sept. 24, 2011, 1:58 p.m.)
Review request for kdelibs.
Changes
Thomas
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102671/#review6772
---
On Sept. 23, 2011, 12:23 p.m., Thomas Gahr wrote:
>
&
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102671/
---
(Updated Sept. 23, 2011, 12:23 p.m.)
Review request for kdelibs.
Changes
=kde-core-devel&m=131616667329975&w=2 by Aaron - dunno
if the patch has been applied yet or will be applied at all... :/
- Thomas
On Sept. 20, 2011, 12:18 p.m., Thomas Gahr wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically gen
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102671/
---
Review request for kdelibs.
Summary
---
This patch changes KDialog::s
> The question is whether a workaround in KDialog::screenRect replacing
> QDesktopWidget::geometry is in order. I think it won't do any harm to use
> QDesktopWidget::screenGeometry(-1) instead - any objections/suggestions?
>
Without further ado, I'll reply to myself and suggest a patch replacing
Firstly: Aaron, thanks for the clarification!
Secondly: Testcase & Results:
The testcase investigates the following things:
If Qt reacts correctly in case a screen is (dis)connected:
-QDesktopWidget::screenCountChanged is connected to a slot updating "the
info labels" (see below)
-an event-f
uot;spam" the list if another measure would be
more appropriate.
Cheers and thanks,
Thomas
[0] http://standards.freedesktop.org/wm-spec/1.3/ar01s03.html
On Wednesday 07 September 2011 20:31:07 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Tuesday, September 6, 2011 20:17:54 Thomas Gahr wrote:
> > So I cooked u
e the
user's attention tends to be where the mouse-pointer is anyway.
Though tbh I have no idea how this will behave on touch devices...
Cheers,
Thomas Gahr>From 1fc36c8422f068ef25dc34244a4251d7b410a538 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas Gahr
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 20:07:34 +0200
Subjec
10 matches
Mail list logo
