Re: Review Request 120406: ksysguardd: Avoid including IO-wait in CPU load.

2014-10-06 Thread Søren Holm
://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120406/diff/ Testing --- Fx. running a read from a slow USB-media like this will always end up showing 25% load on my system (I have 4 cores) dd if=/dev/sdb of=/dev/null bs=1M This end up being around 0% with my patch. Thanks, Søren Holm

Re: Review Request 120406: ksysguardd: Avoid including IO-wait in CPU load.

2014-10-06 Thread Søren Holm
y generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120406/#review67948 ------- On sept. 28, 2014, 3:07 p.m., Søren Holm wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. T

Re: Review Request 120406: ksysguardd: Avoid including IO-wait in CPU load.

2014-10-06 Thread Søren Holm
more columns > > for the individual cpu/wait times? > > Søren Holm wrote: > That's right. But fact is that IO-wait is not time actually used. It's > just a clasification of the idle cpu time. > > Thomas Lübking wrote: > Notice that it is NOT in

Re: Review Request 120406: ksysguardd: Avoid including IO-wait in CPU load.

2014-10-06 Thread Søren Holm
more columns > > for the individual cpu/wait times? > > Søren Holm wrote: > That's right. But fact is that IO-wait is not time actually used. It's > just a clasification of the idle cpu time. > > Thomas Lübking wrote: > Notice that it is NOT in

Re: Review Request 120406: ksysguardd: Avoid including IO-wait in CPU load.

2014-09-29 Thread Søren Holm
Giv en that my change will be accepted, but is it applied. I have not commit right. Søndag den 28. september 2014 15:07:51 skrev Søren Holm: > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: &

Review Request 120406: ksysguardd: Avoid including IO-wait in CPU load.

2014-09-28 Thread Søren Holm
--- Fx. running a read from a slow USB-media like this will always end up showing 25% load on my system (I have 4 cores) dd if=/dev/sdb of=/dev/null bs=1M This end up being around 0% with my patch. Thanks, Søren Holm