Jonathan Riddell wrote:
> libqaccessibilityclient is now in kdereview. It's in a git repo
> called libkdeaccessibilityclient but we filed a sysadmin request to
> rename it.
>
> We just released 0.2.0 in unstable (for some reason 0.1.1 was released
> in stable some years ago).
I'd personally str
de in in repo already,
for example,
https://quickgit.kde.org/?p=sonnet.git&a=commit&h=0e6edac621fbd366b126ebd851fbea21355e02d0
- Rex Dieter
On April 27, 2015, 1:30 p.m., Eugene Shalygin wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an aut
when I noticed this
already-open reviewboard submission). Given the polish and feedback already
(and lack of any notable objections), let's get it committed asap.
- Rex Dieter
On April 27, 2015, 1:30 p.m., Eugene Shalygin
> On April 7, 2015, 1:44 a.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
> > This doesn't let the user change the path but the distributor, that's quite
> > a different thing. Maybe it should be a runtime check?
Ideally yes, but the approach taken here so far is at least an incremental
improvement over the st
se
> > this patch but then they should rename kwallet because it won't be doing
> > what it was design to do.
>
> Rex Dieter wrote:
> By that logic, kwallet shouldn't support password-less operation *at
> all*, yet it does. (In case its not obvious, I do
e.org/show_bug.cgi?id=332107
- Rex Dieter
On March 25, 2013, 7:14 p.m., Andreas Hartmetz wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard
Harald Sitter wrote:
> Right, but short of patching KDM to gain proper logind support, should
> one build with or without CK,
build without it.
> i.e. does CK add anything useful if the
> rest of the system is not using it anyway
no. As I understand it, this is the only case where you'd want
Alex Merry wrote:
> Given that applications with clashing desktop file names are almost
> certainly going to cause clashing binary names anyway, my view is that
> the kde4 directory causes more issues than it solves. We may still want
> to prefix things like system settings, though (like
> kde-sy
Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
>
> On Thursday 28 November 2013, Michael Palimaka wrote:
>>
>> Any thoughts?
>>
> In an ideal world we would convince the distros to enable Qt namespace on
> Qt5, so that Qt4 and Qt5 symbols does not clash, and does not cause
> crashes when loaded as plugins etc.
Rex Dieter wrote:
> Matthias Klumpp wrote:
>
>> The current
>> AppStream library uses GObject/GLib, which can be used without
>> problems from any Qt app
>
> this one? https://gitorious.org/appstream/
>
> Are there any formal releases/tarballs? (I'm
Matthias Klumpp wrote:
> The current
> AppStream library uses GObject/GLib, which can be used without
> problems from any Qt app
this one? https://gitorious.org/appstream/
Are there any formal releases/tarballs? (I'm having trouble finding any)
It appears apper needs this to enable appstream
Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> On Sunday 20 October 2013, Torgny Nyblom wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> What is the policy of depending on unreleased libraries? And is that
>> written down somewhere?
...
> IMO it's a pain to depend on unreleased versions of anything.
As this seems to be semi-regular occurrence
> On June 11, 2013, 4:12 p.m., Rex Dieter wrote:
> > Note too: this patch adds 2 new build dependencies, dbus-devel (aka dbus
> > pkgconfig file: dbus-1.pc) and accountsservice itself (owner of the xml
> > interface files)
and, unfortunately, qdbusxml2cpp doesn'
(aka dbus
pkgconfig file: dbus-1.pc) and accountsservice itself (owner of the xml
interface files)
- Rex Dieter
On June 10, 2013, 4:58 p.m., Greg T wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visi
> On May 25, 2013, 5:25 p.m., Àlex Fiestas wrote:
> > I'm 100% against this patch, it is a no go.
> >
> > What we have to provide is a way for distributions to open the wallet in a
> > SECURE way without asking the user for a password. Distros are free to use
> > this patch but then they shoul
61/#review26461
---
On Jan. 31, 2013, 4:58 p.m., Rex Dieter wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.r
against samba-4.0-rc2
Thanks,
Rex Dieter
tp://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106861/#review20611
-----------
On Oct. 15, 2012, 12:24 p.m., Rex Dieter wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail.
://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106861/diff/
Testing
---
Tested on fedora 18 against samba-4.0-rc2
Thanks,
Rex Dieter
--
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106861/#review20357
-------
On Oct. 14, 2012, 11:43 p.m., Rex Dieter wrote:
>
> -
FindSamba.cmake, helps find samba4 libs on
non-standard-ish locations.
Diffs
-
cmake/modules/FindSamba.cmake 16522c6
Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106861/diff/
Testing
---
Tested on fedora 18 against samba-4.0-rc2
Thanks,
Rex Dieter
Harald Sitter wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 4:39 AM, Shaun Reich
> wrote:
>> anyone know how can i access phonon through javascript?
>
> javascript? qtscript you mean?
>
> I think you will need http://code.google.com/p/qtscriptgenerator/ for that
If that's the only option, don't get your hop
t; 2.8.5 (with this commit cerry-picked:
> http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commitdiff;h=317d077f) and 2.8.6. Same
> output on both.
> What should it look like?
>
> Rex Dieter wrote:
> For what it's worth, on my fedora 16 x86_64 box:
> CMAKE_PLATFO
> On Dec. 16, 2011, 4:40 p.m., Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > Actually this looks more like a cmake bug, the contents of
> > CMAKE_PLATFORM_IMPLICIT_LINK_DIRECTORIES seem to be quite wrong.
> > What version of cmake are you using ?
> >
>
> Felix Geyer wrote:
> 2.8.5 (with this commit cerry-p
On 11/04/2011 05:05 PM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
we currently have libkactivities in kdelibs/experimental. due to upcoming
changs and frameworks 5 development, it has been moved into its own git
repository: kactivities.
i would like to request approval to remove it from kdelibs/experimental and
mak
Milian Wolff wrote:
> Could someone maybe explain a few points on this issue for me?
>
> 1) When does it manifest? Apparently when using QUrl("...") directly, if
> I'm not mistaken. But what if we use KUrl?
KUrl uses QUrl behind the scenes for several cases.
-- rex
Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Thursday, 27 de October de 2011 13:32:51 Rex Dieter wrote:
>> See also,
>> http://bugs.kde.org/285028
>> ( and https://bugreports.qt.nokia.com/browse/QTBUG-22382 )
>>
>> In Qt 4.8, QUrl.toLocalFile now seems, by design, to return NU
See also,
http://bugs.kde.org/285028
( and https://bugreports.qt.nokia.com/browse/QTBUG-22382 )
In Qt 4.8, QUrl.toLocalFile now seems, by design, to return NULL for urls
lacking any scheme. Discovered this the hard way figuring out why all my
audio knotifications were quiet. Since audio event
> On Oct. 17, 2011, 3:16 p.m., Rex Dieter wrote:
> > Wouldn't it make more sense to up the minimum kdelibs requirement to 4.7
> > (which already depends on the newer soprano?)
nevermind, kdelibs' CMakeLists.txt only has set(SOPRANO_MIN_VERSION "2.5.60")
curr
elibs requirement to 4.7 (which
already depends on the newer soprano?)
- Rex Dieter
On Oct. 16, 2011, 10:29 a.m., Ralf Jung wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard
org/r/101791/
> ---
>
> (Updated June 27, 2011, 11:16 p.m.)
>
>
> Review request for kdelibs, Burkhard Lück, Rex Dieter, and Albert Astals Cid.
>
>
> Summary
> ---
>
> Previously, local.l10n.xml was defined to use a bu
John Layt wrote:
> I was wondering if we need to define a "New Dependencies" policy, or at
> least some guidelines to remind people what to think about when choosing
> or creating new dependencies?
I would welcome a formal policy.
here's some references I found to related existing documents and
rg/r/6111/#review9347
---
On 2010-12-20 21:52:20, Rex Dieter wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://svn.revie
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/6111/
---
(Updated 2010-12-20 21:52:20.637316)
Review request for kdelibs.
Changes
-
e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/6111/#review9248
-------
On 2010-12-13 17:07:48, Rex Dieter wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an autom
> On 2010-12-13 16:48:31, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
> > How about using vnd.kde.fontspackage instead of x-kde-fontspackage?
>
> Rex Dieter wrote:
> I only used x-kde-fontspackage at aaron's suggestion in one of the
> aforementioned bugs, I'm not attached to it
th
me too.
- Rex
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/6111/#review9232
---
On 2010-12-13 17:07:4
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/6111/
---
(Updated 2010-12-13 17:07:48.354415)
Review request for kdelibs.
Changes
-
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/6111/
---
Review request for kdelibs.
Summary
---
This patch adjusts the kde "fak
39 matches
Mail list logo
