On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 14:49:07 +0100, Harald Sitter wrote:
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Matthias Klumpp
wrote:
2014-02-17 13:55 GMT+01:00 Lukáš Tinkl :
Dne 17.2.2014 11:51, Harald Sitter napsal(a):
Ahoys
I was looking for some input on KDM+CK in a Logind world. When a
system is using L
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 11:51:33 +0100, Harald Sitter wrote:
Ahoys
I was looking for some input on KDM+CK in a Logind world. When a
system is using Logind I guess KDM+CK doesn't do much useful, so the
question arose whether distributions with such a lineup should build
without CK support. In short
Hi,
recently there were loads of crash reports for akonadi_imap_resource in
Fedora (seems it was crashing only on x86_64 architecture but this isn't
what I'm writing about).
Basically, what happened:
1) The socket was disconnected by the server side
2) Attempts to reconnect
On Tue, 07 May 2013 22:47:09 +0200, Rolf Eike Beer
wrote:
Am Dienstag, 7. Mai 2013, 22:21:46 schrieb Àlex Fiestas:
Would be nice to have some kind of unittests on this, that will make a
different with the current implementation (which afaik it has none)
Even better would be to have them fi
Well, as I said last week, I started working on it.
First few commits are in branch mbriza/kdisplaymanager-split.
Currently, PLEASE, don't judge me for the KDMBackendPrivate class stuff.
:) I have just cut that out of KDisplayManager, not really knowing what to
do with it further. I'll try to
On Thu, 02 May 2013 13:12:55 +0200, Martin Briza wrote:
On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 17:33:57 +0200, Aaron J. Seigo
wrote:
On Thursday, April 25, 2013 15:11:25 Martin Briza wrote:
- The KDisplayManager class is used only on a few places so
replacing its
constructions with calls to the factory
On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 17:35:01 +0200, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
On Thursday, April 25, 2013 15:11:25 Martin Briza wrote:
- The KDisplayManager class is used only on a few places so replacing
its
constructions with calls to the factory will be easy.
oh, btw.. the LightDM code there is also
On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 17:33:57 +0200, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
On Thursday, April 25, 2013 15:11:25 Martin Briza wrote:
I would leave creating the CK module to somebody who is experienced with
how exactly the whole system works and knows if it is safe.
if it is a refactor, this should be a
Hi,
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 09:17:15 +0200, Oswald Buddenhagen
wrote:
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 03:11:25PM +0200, Martin Bříza wrote:
To provide reasons why to do it:
- The current state is nearly unmaintainable
that tiny file? you have a low threshold. ;)
Yeah, that's true :) But thinking
Hi,
On Fri, 26 Apr 2013 23:30:43 +0200, Albert Astals Cid
wrote:
El Dijous, 25 d'abril de 2013, a les 15:11:25, Martin Briza va escriure:
after fixing a bit in the $subj
Which repo is that? Are we installing that file header?
The systemd support fix is now in master branch, i
Hi everyone,
after fixing a bit in the $subj file I've realized it (in my opinion)
should be split into one abstract class with a factory handling the
back-ends provided by the current session managers such as ConsoleKit and
systemd-logind while providing one module for the legacy DMs with
11 matches
Mail list logo
