Re: Telemetry in Plasma and Discover

2022-07-12 Thread Luca Beltrame
In data martedì 12 luglio 2022 16:52:21 CEST, Nate Graham ha scritto: Hello Nate, > +Fabian Vogt and Luca Beltrame specifically > > Thanks, that's a relief! Does this looks legit enough for openSUSE to > stop patching out the KUSerFeedback integration? In principle I do not ha

Re: Move Koko to KDEReview

2020-06-15 Thread Luca Beltrame
Il giorno Fri, 12 Jun 2020 16:05:36 + Carl Schwan ha scritto: > I asked a few packagers I know and for them, since the packagers can > download the files and put them into the tarball, it should be fine. The README should state what purpose those files have. I didn't find any comment in the

Please watch build statuses of dependent projects (was: Re: Manner in which kde-gtk-config development is conducted)

2020-03-20 Thread Luca Beltrame
a pre-review CI won't help with, so lxr and careful approaches are the way to go. -- Luca Beltrame - KDE Forums team GPG key ID: A29D259B signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: Blacklisting of PIM from the CI system

2019-12-05 Thread Luca Beltrame
Il giorno Thu, 05 Dec 2019 01:23:28 +0100 Kevin Kofler ha scritto: > The git SHA is not going to work for this, because it is not > monotonic. What you really want to know is whether you have something > >= 5.65.0.abcd123, and having a 5.65.0.commithash version is not > >going to tell you that.

Re: Ruqola in KDE-review

2019-09-12 Thread Luca Beltrame
Il giorno Thu, 12 Sep 2019 09:20:45 +0200 laurent Montel ha scritto: > Hi, > I would like to move ruqola to extragear/network. > So I asked to sysadmin to move ruqola to kde-review (it was done). Naive question: what does ruqola do? pgpQ9_cbUN2Ck.pgp Description: Firma digitale OpenPGP

Re: liquidshell in kdereview

2019-04-14 Thread Luca Beltrame
ake or reading CMakelists.txt (fine for simpler projects, but not for large ones). -- Luca Beltrame GPG key ID: A29D259B pgpJP4dfjoxjC.pgp Description: Firma digitale OpenPGP

Re: CI system maintainability

2019-03-28 Thread Luca Beltrame
openSUSE, where I usually don't subscribe to failure notifications (almost 300 packages is overkill) but a bot starts pestering me with mails the moment build failures go unfixed (granted, the time scale is different). For the first, I'd like people more involved in the development to s

Re: CI system maintainability

2019-03-28 Thread Luca Beltrame
7;m neither on the side of "review all the things" nor on the anarchist side. I just want to make sure we don't engage in policies that can be (potentially, just potentially) harmful for some parts of KDE (while they are perfectly OK for others). -- Luca Beltrame GPG key ID: A29D259B signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: CI system maintainability

2019-03-28 Thread Luca Beltrame
im it may work 100%, but I've seen other communities (many, many years ago) where a "semi anarchy" replaced by "iron-gripped rules" from one day to another actually killed them. -- Luca Beltrame GPG key ID: A29D259B signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: CI system maintainability

2019-03-28 Thread Luca Beltrame
s repositories managed by different groups. Some are very used to reviews, others not (and not necessarily PIM). Hence the (even debatable, if you may) proposal. -- Luca Beltrame GPG key ID: A29D259B signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: CI system maintainability

2019-03-28 Thread Luca Beltrame
to shreds) Pre-commit CI (i.e. once the switch to GitLab occurs) and perhaps direct mailing to the user (as I suggested earlier) in case of continuous failures will also help. If this thing works, one can gradually ramp up the requirements of things that go through review when the "muscle me

Re: CI system maintainability

2019-03-28 Thread Luca Beltrame
agree. I can't speak for seasoned developers, but I've found myself in a situation (more than once) where the fix is trivial (compile error, missing ";", etc) and being forced to go through review would (IMO) unnecessarily raise friction. -- Luca Beltrame GPG key ID: A2

Re: Python bindings using cppyy (was: An update on Python bindings)

2018-11-06 Thread Luca Beltrame
Il giorno Mon, 5 Nov 2018 22:54:40 +0100 Dominik Haumann ha scritto: > ... wasn't there also some python related work by Stefan? Or is that > unrelated? That involves only the existing bindings, this is completely different from an architectural viewpoint. -- Luca Beltrame - KDE

Re: RKWard is in kdereview

2018-10-09 Thread Luca Beltrame
for his day to day job I can't comment much on the code itself but I just want to say: congratulations for reaching this milestone! -- Luca Beltrame - KDE Forums team GPG key ID: A29D259B pgpntzMi7Kceh.pgp Description: Firma digitale OpenPGP

Re: Ring-KDE in kdereview

2018-02-11 Thread Luca Beltrame
Il giorno Sun, 11 Feb 2018 11:12:32 +0100 Albert Astals Cid ha scritto: > The automatic fetching of stuff from github on make time was weird. I doubt it will influence the kdereview process much, but this is a no-go for distributions. -- Luca Beltrame - KDE Forums team GPG key ID: A29D2

Re: liquidshell in kdereview

2017-11-05 Thread Luca Beltrame
Il giorno Sun, 05 Nov 2017 19:24:55 +0100 Martin Koller ha scritto: > > * Use QDBus instead of calling dbus-send command-line tool or > > xdg-screensaver > Because ? Personally, because I don't think that calling random executables from your program is a good idea. --

Re: Python bindings using cppyy (was: An update on Python bindings)

2017-11-03 Thread Luca Beltrame
are working solidly. I would suggest not to work with Akonadi at this point. PIM has no ABI or API stability guarantee, so you'd be left chasing the evolution of the libs. For the reasons I outlined in the past mails, it'd be much better to use the Frameworks themselves thanks to API

Re: Python bindings using cppyy (was: An update on Python bindings)

2017-11-02 Thread Luca Beltrame
dings in the frameworks, to ensure that if something breaks, it can be fixed instead of bitrotting. -- Luca Beltrame - KDE Forums team GPG key ID: A29D259B pgpd6TWpxwWDR.pgp Description: Firma digitale OpenPGP

Re: Plasma Browser Integration is in kdereview

2017-06-05 Thread Luca Beltrame
it. Also bear in mind that, at least for the Chrome ecosystem, Chrome and Chromium (the latter actually used by the distributions) handle this mechanism in a slightly different way (I had a very high-level discussion with kbroulik on IRC a few weeks ago). -- Luca Beltrame - KDE Forums team KD

Licensing issues in Parley: GPLv2+ vs GPLv3+

2017-04-22 Thread Luca Beltrame
ould be to relicense the file to GPLv2+. Would you (who are listed in the copyright headers: Inge Wallin and Andreas Xavier) allow for this relicensing? Thanks. -- Luca Beltrame - KDE Forums team GPG key ID: A29D259B signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: CI Requirements - Lessons Not Learnt?

2017-01-13 Thread Luca Beltrame
Il giorno Sat, 14 Jan 2017 02:36:50 +0900 Eike Hein ha scritto: > How to subscribe sysadmin: Indeed something we still need to figure > out. In Phab, there's the Sysadmin group that can be used. -- Luca Beltrame - KDE Forums team GPG key ID: A29D259B pgpLjBm3AgG7C.pgp Descrip

Re: CI Requirements - Lessons Not Learnt?

2017-01-12 Thread Luca Beltrame
ollowing reviews: I keep an eye on merged reviews to see whether I need to adjust packaging. Not implying anyone should be subscribed to all reviews (that would be insane), only that also "outside" members are watching them. Perhaps CC'ing Sysadmin as proposed for "base" depe

Re: CI Requirements - Lessons Not Learnt?

2017-01-12 Thread Luca Beltrame
Il giorno Thu, 12 Jan 2017 16:53:18 +0100 Martin Gräßlin ha scritto: > If you do nevertheless, my upstream position is GO FUCK YOURSELF! It > will mean that I will directly close every bug report we get from > Fedora with RESOLVED DOWNSTREAM, "Cannot investigate, Fedora patched OK, things are

Re: Dropping kdelibs4-based applications in KDE Applications 17.12

2016-11-10 Thread Luca Beltrame
Il giorno Thu, 10 Nov 2016 23:42:36 +0100 Albert Astals Cid ha scritto: > Comments? +1 from me, seems like a good idea. -- Luca Beltrame - KDE Forums team GPG key ID: A29D259B pgp8PgrKPav7L.pgp Description: Firma digitale OpenPGP

Re: Why do we need to run two kwalletd?

2016-05-31 Thread Luca Beltrame
Il giorno Mon, 30 May 2016 22:57:18 -0300 Thiago Macieira ha scritto: > Can you clarify how this is supposed to work? As Albert said, I was wrong. I meant only the first migration, there's no runtime merging. pgpvwmIgm4z9Y.pgp Description: Firma digitale OpenPGP

Re: Why do we need to run two kwalletd?

2016-05-29 Thread Luca Beltrame
On Sat, 28 May 2016 11:53:56 -0300, Thiago Macieira wrote: > It's simple to make kwalletd5 acquire both D-Bus names, which would > prevent kwalletd from doing so. I don't know how to prevent it from Stefan Bruens made a patch to use a single D-Bus services for both wallets, IIRC. It's in branch

Re: [Kde-bindings] A new attempt on PyKDE5 binding generation

2016-04-06 Thread Luca Beltrame
would go in there, any other Exactly as you suggest here, +1. -- Luca Beltrame - KDE Forums team GPG key ID: A29D259B pgpQWbgcqWWB8.pgp Description: Firma digitale OpenPGP

Re: A new attempt on PyKDE5 binding generation

2016-03-29 Thread Luca Beltrame
Il Sat, 26 Mar 2016 22:30:18 +, Shaheed Haque ha scritto: Hey Shaheed, > about 800 lines of Python code [2] which can already create 684 .sip > files [3]. As someone who occasionally worked on PyKDE4 I can say this is nothing short of awesome! > whatever. If anybody can actually explain, t

Re: Review Request 126413: FindPyKDE4: Make PYKDE4_INSTALL_PYTHON_FILES use PYTHON_INSTALL.

2015-12-18 Thread Luca Beltrame
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126413/#review89701 --- Ship it! Inviala! - Luca Beltrame On Dic. 18, 2015, 1:12

Re: Review Request 126345: PythonMacros: specify destination directory in byte-compiled files

2015-12-14 Thread Luca Beltrame
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126345/#review89484 --- Ship it! Inviala! - Luca Beltrame On Dic. 14, 2015, 5:48

Re: Why is C90 enforced in KDE?

2015-12-07 Thread Luca Beltrame
it harder *for us* to work just because you're targeting another platform. You may not care for Linux distros, but there are people who *do*. -- Luca Beltrame - KDE Forums team KDE Science supporter GPG key ID: A29D259B

Re: GCompris in kdereview

2015-03-30 Thread Luca Beltrame
Bruno Coudoin wrote: > As we cannot have a translated stable branch and we need to Perhaps naive question: why? -- Luca Beltrame - KDE Forums team KDE Science supporter GPG key ID: 6E1A4E79

Re: Another proposal for modernization of our infrastructure

2015-02-02 Thread Luca Beltrame
re's fire and forget, or KDevelop integration (at least, used to work). The issue is: for people that commit every once in a while, the workflow is still a little too complex with Gerrit, at least the "proposed" one. Of course, if there are ways around the problem, then it becomes

Re: libkgeomap

2015-01-30 Thread Luca Beltrame
repo organization, IMO), if each release / beta release would also be tagged in git. There are already scripts for it, see the ones used to release Applications, the Frameworks scripts, or the ones used by the Plasma team. -- Luca Beltrame - KDE Forums team KDE Science supporter GPG key ID: 6E1A4E79

Re: Another proposal for modernization of our infrastructure

2015-01-29 Thread Luca Beltrame
hs, at best) it's a daunting task. Personally I have no issue with git or rbt (and yes, I don't like rbt), but this puts an extra burden that might be unwanted. This is only the perspective of an occasional contributor, so perhaps it doesn't weigh as much. > -- Luca Beltra

Re: Another proposal for modernization of our infrastructure

2015-01-29 Thread Luca Beltrame
CLI or the web interface, I find Gerrit's UI to be pretty much clumsy and hard to understand, not to mention when reading reviews (points already raised by Martin G). People can work around it, but IMO it's far too intimidating for people that only occasionally contribute patches. --

Re: Sysadmin report on the modernization of our infrastructure

2015-01-21 Thread Luca Beltrame
ll be pointed out. Thanks for all your work. -- Luca Beltrame - KDE Forums team KDE Science supporter GPG key ID: 6E1A4E79

Re: Holes in KDE (fork of "Changes in Git Infra" thread)

2015-01-10 Thread Luca Beltrame
(and checks to external services to prevent obvious spammers) we have to kill several spam posts per day. Also IMO registration is to keep a minimal barrier of entry to prevent flames and other unwanted behavior (granted, the forums behave exceptionally well - few times we've had to po

Re: Fwd: Re: [Kde-pim] Problems with infrastructure

2014-12-15 Thread Luca Beltrame
rt PRs (I haven't been able to test them, as they run on public-yet-private instances). -- Luca Beltrame - KDE Forums team KDE Science supporter GPG key ID: 6E1A4E79

Re: [Kde-pim] Problems with infrastructure

2014-12-15 Thread Luca Beltrame
goes (after seeing both gitbucket and gogs, one more won't hurt ;) -- Luca Beltrame - KDE Forums team KDE Science supporter GPG key ID: 6E1A4E79

Re: [Kde-pim] Problems with infrastructure

2014-12-15 Thread Luca Beltrame
if it fits KDE's needs. > that company behind it closed the source, but a fully open source fork is > been done > https://kallithea-scm.org/ This looks good, however the major roadblock is that it doesn't support SSH based cloning, meaning it would need some other glue to handle th

Fwd: Re: [Kde-pim] Problems with infrastructure

2014-12-15 Thread Luca Beltrame
Sending this to k-c-d, probably has been sent to me only by mistake: it offers additional insights on software. - Messaggio inoltrato - Oggetto: Re: [Kde-pim] Problems with infrastructure Data: sabato 13 dicembre 2014, 08:21:15 Da: Helio Chissini de Castro A: Luca Beltrame

Re: [Kde-pim] Problems with infrastructure

2014-12-15 Thread Luca Beltrame
;re a KDE contributor, you should always have the CoC in mind. -- Luca Beltrame - KDE Forums team KDE Science supporter GPG key ID: 6E1A4E79

Re: [Kde-pim] Problems with infrastructure

2014-12-13 Thread Luca Beltrame
://github.com/takezoe/gitbucket Gogs: https://gogs.io Hope this helps. -- Luca Beltrame - KDE Forums team KDE Science supporter GPG key ID: 6E1A4E79

Re: [Kde-pim] Problems with infrastructure

2014-12-13 Thread Luca Beltrame
eply to Christian to see where (to my knowledge) we are at the moment. -- Luca Beltrame - KDE Forums team KDE Science supporter GPG key ID: 6E1A4E79

Re: Review Request 121078: Fix exports.

2014-11-20 Thread Luca Beltrame
> On Nov. 20, 2014, 9 a.m., Luca Beltrame wrote: > > Actually it's still broken: I didn't notice because I did not build tests: > > > > > > /srv/jenkins/workspace/kde-baseapps_frameworks_qt5/konqueror/src/konqapplication.h:28:46: > > error: expecte

Re: Review Request 121078: Fix exports.

2014-11-20 Thread Luca Beltrame
I did not build tests: /srv/jenkins/workspace/kde-baseapps_frameworks_qt5/konqueror/src/konqapplication.h:28:46: error: expected initializer before ‘:’ token The line being class KONQ_TESTS_EXPORT KonquerorApplication : public KApplication - Luca Beltrame On Nov. 20, 2014, 3:29 a.m.,

Re: Review Request 121078: Fix exports.

2014-11-20 Thread Luca Beltrame
org/r/121078/#comment49452> This one was missing from the commit and broke the build. I fixed it in 9cd55421bdadc663c947ddac9504a8d916e87012. - Luca Beltrame On Nov. 20, 2014, 3:29 a.m., Andrius da Costa Ribas wrote: > > ---

Re: Review Request 121078: Fix exports.

2014-11-19 Thread Luca Beltrame
: fatal error: libdolphin_export.h: No such file or directory - Luca Beltrame On Nov. 20, 2014, 3:29 a.m., Andrius da Costa Ribas wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit

Re: kdepimlibs Coverity Scan Report, Oct 14 2014

2014-10-18 Thread Luca Beltrame
Gilles Caulier wrote: > If you look opensource projects scanned by Coverity, you will seen all > most important on the world. But let's not forget, it is non-Free software. -- Luca Beltrame - KDE Forums team KDE Science supporter GPG key ID: 6E1A4E79

Re: Review Request 119454: Make FindPyKDE4 work with PyQt's new build system.

2014-07-27 Thread Luca Beltrame
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119454/#review63256 --- Ship it! Looks OK to me. - Luca Beltrame On Lug. 24, 2014

Re: Review Request 119302: Make FindPyQt4 work with PyQt's new build system.

2014-07-16 Thread Luca Beltrame
- > > (Updated Lug. 16, 2014, 1:21 p.m.) > > > Review request for kdelibs, Alex Merry, Luca Beltrame, and Simon Edwards. > > > Bugs: 337462 > http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=337462 > > > Repository: kdelibs > > > Description > ---

Re: Review Request 119302: Make FindPyQt4 work with PyQt's new build system.

2014-07-16 Thread Luca Beltrame
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119302/#review62505 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Luca Beltrame On Lug. 16, 2014, 1:21

Re: Review Request 119302: Make FindPyQt4 work with PyQt's new build system.

2014-07-15 Thread Luca Beltrame
-- On Lug. 15, 2014, 9:19 p.m., Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119302/ > ---

Re: Review Request 119302: Make FindPyQt4 work with PyQt's new build system.

2014-07-15 Thread Luca Beltrame
system people say as well, if possible. - Luca Beltrame On Lug. 15, 2014, 9:19 p.m., Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://git.reviewboard.kde.

Re: Review Request 119302: Make FindPyQt4 work with PyQt's new build system.

2014-07-15 Thread Luca Beltrame
> On Lug. 15, 2014, 9:28 p.m., Luca Beltrame wrote: > > cmake/modules/FindPyQt.py, line 40 > > <https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119302/diff/1/?file=290346#file290346line40> > > > > If I understand correctly, configuring without -DPYQT4_SIP_DIR > >

Re: Review Request 119302: Make FindPyQt4 work with PyQt's new build system.

2014-07-15 Thread Luca Beltrame
g/r/119302/#comment43355> If I understand correctly, configuring without -DPYQT4_SIP_DIR specified may cause undefined behavior? While this may be a workaround, I'd suggest to ask Phil upstream to introduce a way to access it somehow. - Luca Beltrame On Lug. 15, 201

Re: Configuration files transfer

2014-04-06 Thread Luca Beltrame
penSUSE where I'm involved in) will offer the KF5-based workspace as an aside and not as main desktop. -- Luca Beltrame - KDE Forums team KDE Science supporter GPG key ID: 6E1A4E79

Re: KF5: Parsing times with timezone abbreviations

2014-03-24 Thread Luca Beltrame
Kevin Kofler wrote: > In kdelibs 4, this should do what we want: > dateTime = KDateTime::fromString(timeString, "%H:%M > %Z").toLocalZone().dateTime(); but KDateTime is deprecated in KF5. Can you try looking at KFormat? The KF5 porting notes explicitly mention that. --

Re: Review Request 114314: Fix traceback in Python runner plugins

2013-12-05 Thread Luca Beltrame
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114314/#review45228 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Luca Beltrame On Dec. 5, 2013, 11:11

Re: Proposal for branching policy towards KF5

2013-07-18 Thread Luca Beltrame
Martin Graesslin wrote: > how do we prevent that people commit features into master? I would prefer To be honest, I haven't really seen people commit features into kdelibs, and that's been frozen for a while. -- Luca Beltrame - KDE Forums team KDE Science supporter GPG key ID: 6E1A4E79

Re: KDE/4.11 branched what to do with kde-workspace?

2013-07-17 Thread Luca Beltrame
trying to do in openSUSE to *ease* the need for those doing development / bug reporting, avoiding a full source build, would grind to a halt with master = frameworks. - -- Luca Beltrame - KDE Forums team KDE Science supporter GPG key ID: 6E1A4E79 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Vers

Re: Releases in 3 months

2013-07-17 Thread Luca Beltrame
Albert Astals Cid wrote: > Just as a reminder, we have the Release Team BOF tomorrow July 17 at 10:15 > at Room A2 Would it be possible to post the outcome of the discussion here? It would be very helpful (as unfortunately I'm not in Bilbao). -- Luca Beltrame - KDE Forums team

Re: Releases in 3 months

2013-07-16 Thread Luca Beltrame
ere are /doubts/, rather than absolute certainties. We're happy to be proven wrong, in fact. ;) -- Luca Beltrame - KDE Forums team KDE Science supporter GPG key ID: 6E1A4E79

Re: Releases in 3 months

2013-07-15 Thread Luca Beltrame
ike that, even if it is improper) should be put in place first, and then applied to shrink release times. -- Luca Beltrame - KDE Forums team KDE Science supporter GPG key ID: 6E1A4E79

Re: Releases in 3 months

2013-07-13 Thread Luca Beltrame
s that hold KDE developers accounts. The problem is, as I can see, numbers (those people are a minor percentage of $DISTRO_CONTRIBUTORS and they also do packaging) and sometimes expertise (I can touch CMake files and perhaps do little adjustments in C++, but nowhere near fixing complex bugs).

Re: Releases in 3 months

2013-07-12 Thread Luca Beltrame
the bigger distros offer unsupported repositories for newer versions - and at least in the case of openSUSE some are actually used by contributors and early adopters to test the packaging of newest versions. -- Luca Beltrame - KDE Forums team KDE Science supporter GPG key ID: 6E1A4E79

Re: Releases in 3 months

2013-07-12 Thread Luca Beltrame
is mostly automated nowadays, however packaging (proper packaging) still requires manual checking. -- Luca Beltrame - KDE Forums team KDE Science supporter GPG key ID: 6E1A4E79

Re: openSUSE packagers' take on the 3 month release cycle

2013-07-08 Thread Luca Beltrame
Minor releases (except when splitting is involved) are usually less work- intensive, although the matter with patches etc needs to be evaluated each time. In the easiest case, it's just a matter of waiting for the OBS to churn out packages. Hopefully this is more clear. -- Luca Beltrame

openSUSE packagers' take on the 3 month release cycle

2013-07-08 Thread Luca Beltrame
forum admin hat on) where issues are fixed already but distros don't carry the required updates. So this would be detrimental for the distribution(s) anyway. Therefore, the only logical conclusion is -1 to this proposal. -- Luca Beltrame - KDE Forums team KDE Science supporter GPG key ID

Re: Review Request 111371: Fix duplicate targets in PythonMacros.cmake, unbreaking Ninja builds for Python-based KDE apps

2013-07-03 Thread Luca Beltrame
> On July 4, 2013, 5:35 a.m., Luca Beltrame wrote: > > Ship It! Please put this modification also in kdelibs master branch (in fact, put it in master so it'll get merged in next time dfaure merges master into framewo

Re: Review Request 111371: Fix duplicate targets in PythonMacros.cmake, unbreaking Ninja builds for Python-based KDE apps

2013-07-03 Thread Luca Beltrame
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111371/#review35551 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Luca Beltrame On July 2, 2013, 6:58

Re: Review Request 111042: Upstream SUSE specific changes and introduce a DISTRO switch to enable

2013-07-01 Thread Luca Beltrame
can be easily reviewed and commented. I will > upload a patch series and close this review request if a solutions is found Unless the issues with the patches are *fixed* instead of being pushed on KDE, -1 regardless of the numbers of requests. -- Luca Beltrame - KDE Forums team KDE Science

Re: Review Request 111042: Upstream SUSE specific changes and introduce a DISTRO switch to enable

2013-06-16 Thread Luca Beltrame
> On June 15, 2013, 5:06 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > Is this some kind of joke? > > > > Honestly upstreaming patches is good, but when they make sense, and adding > > billions of "If #SUSE" to our code does not make any sense. Please discard > > this review, break stuff in separate patc

Re: Review Request 111042: Upstream SUSE specific changes and introduce a DISTRO switch to enable

2013-06-15 Thread Luca Beltrame
> On June 15, 2013, 6:52 p.m., Luca Beltrame wrote: > > I would like to chime in, since I'm also a member of the openSUSE community > > KDE team. This patch and the idea behind it is *not* the official position > > of openSUSE, nor the official position of the o

Re: Review Request 111042: Upstream SUSE specific changes and introduce a DISTRO switch to enable

2013-06-15 Thread Luca Beltrame
E git (and I say this with *both* my KDE and distro hats on) is a no-no. Definitely -1, on behalf of the team (myself, Raymond "tittiatcoke" Wooninck and Hrvoje "shumski" Senjan"). - Luca Beltrame On June 15, 2013,

Re: Review Request: Respect PYTHONDONTWRITEBYTECODE environmental variable

2012-11-07 Thread Luca Beltrame
flict (porting it to the new version) in 5966ecd67bb1572e0149834501be9eba537e4f54. - Luca Beltrame On Nov. 7, 2012, 7:28 p.m., Michael Palimaka wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply,

Re: Review Request: Respect PYTHONDONTWRITEBYTECODE env variable

2012-11-06 Thread Luca Beltrame
> On Nov. 6, 2012, 10:49 p.m., Luca Beltrame wrote: > > Good catch, I missed that. Push to 4.9: as I'm not sure it would merge > > cleanly as I changed a bit of things in 4.10, CC me in the commit and I'll > > see about trying to adapt it. Bear in mind that i

Re: Review Request: Respect PYTHONDONTWRITEBYTECODE env variable

2012-11-06 Thread Luca Beltrame
m not sure it would merge cleanly as I changed a bit of things in 4.10, CC me in the commit and I'll see about trying to adapt it. - Luca Beltrame On Nov. 6, 2012, 10:50 a.m., Andrea Scarpino wrote: > > --- > This is an automa

First line support outside of bugs.kde.org (cf. Bugzilla discussion)

2012-02-24 Thread Luca Beltrame
(please CC me, I'm not subscribed to k-c-d) Hello everyone, given the discussion going on with how to handle bug reports, I've seen a few mentions of first line support that would help reduce the number of improper bugs filed in bugs.kde.org. Well... the good news is that such a thing already

Modularization and other languages' bindings (was: The Future of our Frameworks)

2011-06-06 Thread Luca Beltrame
) that albeit small, contribute their little to the use of KDE. -- Luca Beltrame - KDE Forums team KDE Science supporter GPG key ID: 6E1A4E79 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.