Hi all,
sorry for reading the mailing list very rarely nowadays.
On 17.11.2016 10:25, Kevin Funk wrote:
On Thursday, 17 November 2016 00:51:50 CET Sven Brauch wrote:
On 11/11/16 16:45, Dominik Haumann wrote:
What do you think about having a Randa meeting (or similar) with focus
on finishing p
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102723/#review6919
---
Ship it!
- Josef Weidendorfer
On Sept. 29, 2011, 6:25 p.m
On Wednesday 28 September 2011, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
> What happens if inPos is -1? pos becomes 0 then. Then we iterate over the
> whole list just to do "if (... && pos != 0)" which will never be true. So for
> this case (inPos == -1) the whole function can be avoided at all as it will
> never
On Wednesday 28 September 2011, Jaime Torres Amate wrote:
>
> > On Sept. 28, 2011, 8:59 a.m., Josef Weidendorfer wrote:
> > > I would expect that the ->constEnd() method completely gets inlined with
> > > compiler optimization turned on. So are you sure your change
ets inlined with
compiler optimization turned on. So are you sure your change
improves anything for a release build? Anything performance related always
needs to be backed by numbers from a release build. Numbers from a debug build
are useless.
- Josef Weidendorfer
On Sept. 27, 2011, 8:42 p.m., Ja
