rp is obviously tightly integrated with Qt, which is,
to me, the very heart of KDE, so I believe that any project which
benefits Qt developers helps KDE grow.
The second reason is that I was actually involved with the KDE
community a few years ago. I was working on Qyoto with Arno Rehn - my
commits ca
> On Aug. 3, 2011, 6:19 p.m., Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > this sounds wrong. what if dbus is started earlier, e.g. by a PAM module?
> > this can easily happen once we use the new SecretService.
> > there should be some interface to push environment variables "into the bus"
> > after it is run
n-transparent being officially in kdebase.
--
Arno Rehn
a...@arnorehn.de
On Tuesday 01 February 2011 13:01:32 Tom Albers wrote:
> 29 kde-java
I think we can safely delete that one. We don't have Java bindings anymore and
the main bindings ML is kde-bindings. A quick glance at those mails would
still be cool (can I somehow view them?).
--
Arno Rehn
a...@arnorehn.de
it clutters history with tons
of merges.
Personally I'd go with 'Commit to master, cherry-pick in 4.6'.
(Feature branches are a different thing).
--
Arno Rehn
a...@arnorehn.de
PI was frozen (which just happened recently), so
we don't need to keep up with ever-changing API. This should be sorted out in
a few days/weeks.
--
Arno Rehn
a...@arnorehn.de
ating them with Qt as tightly as proposed has more drawbacks than
advantages, imho (all of which were already posted).
--
Arno Rehn
a...@arnorehn.de
