Re: The case for a kdelibs 4.8

2011-10-03 Thread Arne Babenhauserheide
Am Samstag, 1. Oktober 2011, 08:27:02 schrieb Martin Gräßlin: > One of the main reasons for the rebranding was to realize that "KDE" is not > one product, but a community that produces multiple products among them a > desktop environment (Plasma). What you just try to tell us is that the > complet

Re: The case for a kdelibs 4.8

2011-09-30 Thread Arne Babenhauserheide
Am Freitag, 30. September 2011, 10:07:27 schrieb Aaron J. Seigo: > will say "Platform 4.7, Plasma > Workspaces 4.8 and application updates" (or something along those lines). > that was not just a marketing ploy, but an attempt to align our public > communication with the realities that already ex

Re: Formal complaint concerning the use of the name "System Settings"

2011-07-24 Thread Arne Babenhauserheide
At Sat, 23 Jul 2011 21:43:16 +0200, Lorenz Quack wrote: > So how can this be resolved? … > TLDR: > For this release: GNOME back off > For the next release: KDE and GNOME unify your settings infrastructure > and pick non-generic names for your apps. Why can’t the Gnome System Settings simply be sho

Re: Modularization and other languages' bindings (was: The Future of our Frameworks)

2011-06-10 Thread Arne Babenhauserheide
On Monday 06 June 2011 21:05:41 Luca Beltrame wrote: > In data Monday 06 June 2011 19:26:38, Sebastian Kügler ha scritto: > > (I took the liberty of adding kde-bindings to the CC of tihs specific topic) > > > We want to make it possible to use our frameworks in Qt projects without > > significant a