Re: Review Request: Show warning when CopyJob fails to list a subdir

.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206500 will kill us if they get a > > message box for every single file. Right now, they have the option to wait > > until the operation is completed, then close the first (and only) message > > box and be happy. > > Ambroz Bizjak wrote: >

Re: Review Request: Show warning when CopyJob fails to list a subdir

> On Aug. 16, 2012, 1:10 p.m., Frank Reininghaus wrote: > > kdeui/jobs/kdialogjobuidelegate.cpp, line 92 > > > > > > I'm afraid the users suffering from > > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206500 will kill us i

Re: Default file manager and folder associations

That doesn't quite work, for me at least. See the bug I reported https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=297720 Nobody seems to care though. On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 12:21 PM, todd rme wrote: > On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Jacopo De Simoi wrote: >> Dear kcd, >> >>  I am thinking for a possible

Re: kdeinit (was: Summary from Buildsystem BoF at Desktop Summit)

>> > if we start from an all-privileged daemon like systemd. It's privilege >> > elevation that suffers. >> >> does the session systemd run privileged in the first place? > > I have no clue. I don't even know if there's a session systemd. > I'm not sure exactly how you people are planning to make

Re: Formal complaint concerning the use of the name "System Settings" by GNOME

If anyone is interested in my proposal for DE-specific keys, I've written a proposal for how the Desktop Entry Specification could be updated. This support could be used to implement the naming mentioned, that is calling it "System Settings" in KDE, and "KDE System Settings" elsewhere - without new

Re: Formal complaint concerning the use of the name "System Settings"

rote: > Hi Ambroz, (and everybody else of course) > > Am Tue, 26 Jul 2011 20:39:27 +0200 > schrieb Ambroz Bizjak : > >> Yes, that is what this extension would allow. It's a powerful tool, >> and any powerful tool can be abused. > If an application has a different

Re: Formal complaint concerning the use of the name "System Settings"

;, where "System Settings", the native tool, is clearly preferred. And if the menu is in the "GenericName" mode, you would get "KDE desktop configuration" and "GNOME desktop configuration", which is, again, confusing. Regards, Ambroz On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 a

Re: Formal complaint concerning the use of the name "System Settings"

de.org/?l=kde-core-devel&m=131160689716557&w=2 Regards, Ambroz On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 10:31 PM, Thomas Lübking wrote: > Am Tue, 26 Jul 2011 21:53:48 +0200 > schrieb Ambroz Bizjak : > >> Hi Thomas, >> >> I hope you are aware that my proposal is a technical solution and

Re: Formal complaint concerning the use of the name "System Settings"

ith a little attention from application developers and listening to users, relevant clashes will quickly be detected (as was the System Settings case). Regards, Ambroz On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 9:10 PM, Thomas Lübking wrote: > Hi Ambroz, (and everybody else of course) > > Am Tue, 26 J

Re: Formal complaint concerning the use of the name "System Settings"

nguages might not even > leave any options in some cases. My proposal is not tied to English in any way. The individual Specific-DE- prefixed keys would come localized, just like the non-prefixed keys. I don't see how choosing sensible names in other languages could be much harder than in Engl

Re: Formal complaint concerning the use of the name "System Settings"

implement, and introduces unnecessary coupling between the fields. What do you think? Regards, Ambroz On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Mark wrote: > On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Ambroz Bizjak wrote: >> Hi Mark, >> >> I am strongly opposed to the particular solution you ar

Re: Formal complaint concerning the use of the name "System Settings"

first look for "Specific-KDE-" and revert to "" if the former does not exist. Regards, Ambroz On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Mark wrote: > On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 12:53 AM, Ambroz Bizjak wrote: >> Hi Mark, >> >> The localization stuff you're c

Re: Formal complaint concerning the use of the name "System Settings"

. I've done many enhancements to open-source projects, and many of them weren't liked by the developers - but I still think I did the right thing, and I'm not afraid of contributing for the fear of being opposed. Regards, Ambroz On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 12:19 AM, Mark wrote: >

Re: Formal complaint concerning the use of the name "System Settings"

Hi Mark, I've done some small research on what components would have to be updated for the desktop-specific-names solution. I think that would be: - The Desktop Entry Specification, http://standards.freedesktop.org/desktop-entry-spec/latest/ - KDE's KDesktopFile, https://projects.kde.org/projects/

Re: Formal complaint concerning the use of the name "System Settings" by GNOME

System Settings Regards, Ambroz On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Mark wrote: > On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Ambroz Bizjak wrote: >> Hi Mark, >> have you seen my proposed improvement on your suggestion? >> >> http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-core-devel&m=131149560

Re: Formal complaint concerning the use of the name "System Settings" by GNOME

Hi Mark, have you seen my proposed improvement on your suggestion? http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-core-devel&m=131149560119520&w=2 I suggest that you consider it, because it would avoid having to update the Freedesktop specification and any DE that doesn't name its programs differently in other DEs

Re: Formal complaint concerning the use of the name "System Settings"

Mark wrote: > Just a small suggestion on how i think this should be "fixed" (since 2 > desktop files for one app seems just ugly to me). > Perhaps it's better to extend the desktop file specification: > http://standards.freedesktop.org/desktop-entry-spec/latest/ar01s05.html > > And i would propose