Re: Ready-to-use Docker images for KF6-based development ?

Hi, On Dienstag, 30. Januar 2024 12:53:32 CET Jonathan Riddell wrote: > *Sure, the Neon unstable one should be ready to go* > *invent-registry.kde.org/neon/docker-images/plasma:unstable > * a few days ago it was working today I go

Ready-to-use Docker images for KF6-based development ?

Hi, I'm still running a Qt5/KF5-based setup on my machine. Is there a ready-to-use docker image/Dockerfile which I could use to work on a KF6-based application, maybe something from KDE neon ? Sorry for the maybe stupid question Alex

Re: Kandalf: request for review

On Dienstag, 19. Dezember 2023 08:31:56 CET Ingo Klöcker wrote: > On Montag, 18. Dezember 2023 23:30:57 CET jvap...@gmail.com wrote: > > On Montag, 18. Dezember 2023 22:27:43 CET Alexander Neundorf wrote: > > > A Kamel is a big, slow and un-funny animal, in german it's also

Re: Kandalf: request for review

On Montag, 18. Dezember 2023 05:06:08 CET J. Varela wrote: > I like that. The k makes sense there. It also fits with the theme of the > target uses. Really ? A Kamel is a big, slow and un-funny animal, in german it's also not a compliment to call somebody a Kamel. Alex

Re: Cleaning up cdash.org integration, what to do, or any hidden usage still?

Hi, On Freitag, 2. September 2022 12:20:50 CEST Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: > Hi, > > (cc: kde-devel for heads-up, please reply only to kde-core-devel). > > we stumbled over some CTestConfig.cmake files in some of the KDE git > repositories. Which seem to originate from a time where people w

Re: New cmake warning.

On Dienstag, 3. Mai 2022 18:43:48 CEST Méven wrote: > Le mar. 3 mai 2022 à 18:25, Thomas Friedrichsmeier < > > thomas.friedrichsme...@kdemail.net> a écrit : > > On Tue, 3 May 2022 10:35:20 +0200 > > > > Méven wrote: > > > I am guessing you are using cmake >= 3.16 so it allows you to run, but > >

Re: CI system maintainability

Hi, On 2019 M03 28, Thu 16:04:01 CET Boudhayan Gupta wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, 28 Mar 2019 at 15:21, Kevin Ottens wrote: > > Hello, > > > > On Thursday, 28 March 2019 14:33:59 CET laurent Montel wrote: > > > I am against to force mandatory review, as it will create a lot of lose > > > > of > >

Re: CI system maintainability

On 2019 M03 28, Thu 17:43:36 CET Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: ... > Though I assume no-one is using it anyway, given there are so few bugs > reported ;) I use it whenever I need to look at a file "raw", and I can't remember having noticed bugs :-) Alex

Re: liquidshell in kdereview

On 2017 M11 6, Mon 10:03:05 CET Tomaz Canabrava wrote: > On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 8:31 AM, Martin Koller wrote: ... > > Whoever does not like plasmashell, for whatever reason. > > My reasons are mentioned in the README or the announcement mail. > > Free software is about choice, no ? > > It is, of

Re: liquidshell in kdereview

On 2017 M11 6, Mon 19:13:36 CET Martin Koller wrote: > On Montag, 6. November 2017 10:03:05 CET Tomaz Canabrava wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 8:31 AM, Martin Koller wrote: > > > On Montag, 6. November 2017 01:57:32 CET Aleix Pol wrote: > > > > On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 9:30 PM, Martin Koller wro

Re: liquidshell in kdereview

On 2017 M11 5, Sun 19:27:27 CET Martin Koller wrote: > On Samstag, 4. November 2017 20:58:49 CET Alexander Neundorf wrote: > > On 2017 M11 3, Fri 21:30:19 CET Martin Koller wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > ... > > > > > - Just one bottom DesktopPanel,

Re: liquidshell in kdereview

On 2017 M11 3, Fri 21:30:19 CET Martin Koller wrote: > Hi all, ... > - Just one bottom DesktopPanel, containing: I always put my panel to the right or left edge (intead at the bottom)... ... > The main motivation was to have a reliable desktop shell which does not hog > the CPU or RAM. (CPU usage

Re: CI Requirements - Lessons Not Learnt?

On 2017 M01 18, Wed 19:59:46 CET Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: .. > Given this is a policy affecting all of the KDE projects, please first > propose it officially in a separate own thread, with a proper subject. > Perhaps even on kde-community, as kde-core-devel might not be read by many, > give

Re: CI Requirements - Lessons Not Learnt?

On 2017 M01 16, Mon 07:48:25 CET Martin Gräßlin wrote: > Am 2017-01-15 22:58, schrieb Alexander Neundorf: > > Hi Martin, > > > > just replying somewhere... > > > > On 2017 M01 15, Sun 14:52:30 CET Martin Gräßlin wrote: > >> I think that is a r

Re: CI Requirements - Lessons Not Learnt?

Hi Martin, just replying somewhere... On 2017 M01 15, Sun 14:52:30 CET Martin Gräßlin wrote: > I think that is a reasonable suggestion. If distros patch our > dependencies we need to consider this as a fork. And a fork should be > called a fork. It needs to be clear that KDE is not responsible fo

Re: CI Requirements - Lessons Not Learnt?

On 2017 M01 12, Thu 04:00:34 CET Kevin Kofler wrote: > Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > Email threads don't work to codify such requirements. What we need is > > something like an "announce new dependency to sysadmin freeze" prior to > > the dependency freeze in the release schedule. That's what I mean wi

Re: CI Requirements - Lessons Not Learnt?

On 2017 M01 6, Fri 17:20:08 CET Kevin Kofler wrote: > PS: > > I wrote: > > Martin Gräßlin wrote: > >> For packagers it should not matter at all. This is the most common > >> situation for distribution. And in the release of e.g. Plasma they have > >> to handle this for hundreds of updated dependen

Re: CI Requirements - Lessons Not Learnt?

On 2017 M01 6, Fri 22:39:22 CET Ben Cooksley wrote: > See my notes above re. why tying this to the dependency freeze date is > a bad idea and won't really work. > > Given that we potentially have to take into account Qt version bumps > and base system rebuilds - i'll give a timeline of 1 month's a

Re: CI Requirements - Lessons Not Learnt?

On 2017 M01 5, Thu 16:11:43 CET Kevin Kofler wrote: > Ben Cooksley wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 10:28 PM, Martin Gräßlin wrote: > >> It should be rather obvious that we don't introduce new dependencies > >> because we like to. There is a very important software reason to it. > >> That's the ca

Re: What's kde-core-devel for?

On 2016 M12 19, Mon 22:48:29 CET Albert Astals Cid wrote: ... > Please let's try to stay focused on topic. > > Cheers, > Albert > > P.S: took me like 4 minutes > > PHP- https://cgit.kde.org/websites/capacity.git/ > Java - https://cgit.kde.org/kdeconnect-android.git/ > Python - https://we

Re: What's kde-core-devel for?

On 2016 M12 19, Mon 10:24:29 CET Jan Kundrát wrote: > KDE has expanded over the last few years to include projects which are not > based on kdelibs or kf5 (or even Qt). I have heard that several times. Which are those beside Wiki2Learn ? Alex

How to commit to kruler ?

Hi, it seems to me that kruler is basically unmaintained, e.g. the patch for bug https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=317436 hasn't been applied since April 2013. So, I'd like to fix that now. How is the procedure for kruler ? Do I need to post this to Phabricator for review first ? (I don't exp

Re: State of Audio CD support in KDE

On Friday, October 02, 2015 04:46:08 Boudhayan Gupta wrote: > On 2 October 2015 at 01:19, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > I'd miss the ripping habilities of kio-audiocd personally, maybe we can > > merge it with kaudiocreator and make them share code? > > Yeah, let's make KAudioCreator do the conver

Re: State of Audio CD support in KDE

On Wednesday, September 30, 2015 05:33:20 Boudhayan Gupta wrote: > Hi Albert (and others), > > On 30 September 2015 at 04:09, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > >> In terms of support for Audio CDs in KDE, > >> > >> * K3B can write them. > >> * Phonon the API can play them, with some minor but weird bug

Re: Naming scheme for Qt5/KF5-based libraries outside of KF5

On Sunday, September 27, 2015 17:21:04 Sune Vuorela wrote: > On 2015-09-27, Boudhayan Gupta wrote: > > What I propose is that all libraries which want to manage their own > > release cycles and their own namespaces, be moved to Extragear Libs > > and release from there. All the libraries which can

Re: Distros and QtWebEngine

On Monday, April 20, 2015 22:54:26 Thomas Lübking wrote: > On Montag, 20. April 2015 22:31:24 CEST, Jeremy Whiting wrote: > > Even simple applications may want to use a webview for stuff. Kanagram at > > one point had a QtWebkit Web view just to show the wikipedia entry of the > > current word. >

Re: Another proposal for modernization of our infrastructure

On Saturday, January 31, 2015 22:52:22 Andreas Pakulat wrote: > Hi, > > just a short note (don't want this to become a complete subthread > distracting from the actual proposal-discussion) > > On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 9:38 PM, Alexander Neundorf > > wrote: >

Re: Another proposal for modernization of our infrastructure

On Saturday, January 31, 2015 21:11:19 Eike Hein wrote: > On 01/31/2015 08:57 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote: > > hmm, looking back at our switch to git, I don't consider our standards for > > documentation of the developer workflow as very high unfortunately. :-/ > &g

Re: Another proposal for modernization of our infrastructure

On Saturday, January 31, 2015 20:52:44 Eike Hein wrote: > On 01/31/2015 08:37 PM, Christoph Feck wrote: > > Excuse me, but if KDE developers will have to follow equivalent steps > > as described at http://qt-project.org/wiki/Setting-up-Gerrit to > > contribute, then I predict another big loss of de

Re: Changes to our Git infrastructure

On Wednesday, January 07, 2015 08:03:06 Martin Gräßlin wrote: > On Tuesday 06 January 2015 12:48:41 Jan Kundrát wrote: > > On Tuesday, 6 January 2015 07:40:01 CEST, Ian Wadham wrote: ... > > This has a risk of splitting the discussion about a patch into multiple > > independent streams where people

Re: Changes to our Git infrastructure

On Monday, January 05, 2015 23:53:02 Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > I'm just trying to make clear that reviewboard is a crappy tool inciting > people to write crappy reviews that drive people away. Apart from any > other nonsense about cultural differences (the standard cop-out from > Dutchmen and German

Re: Changes to our Git infrastructure

On Monday, January 05, 2015 22:35:23 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El Dilluns, 5 de gener de 2015, a les 22:22:19, Boudewijn Rempt va escriure: ... > > * figured out what branches are for, and how different projects handle > > those > > Right, that's hardly documentable though (and will get old soon

Re: Changes to our Git infrastructure

On Monday, January 05, 2015 16:15:09 Ian Wadham wrote: ... > I wonder also how many people have just tiptoed quietly away from the KDE > Community rather than speak out about frustrations they may have been > feeling. Where *did* all those people go in the last few years? And why? I didn't reall

Re: Triggering rebuild after changing a *.json file

On Sunday, November 23, 2014 23:37:45 Kevin Funk wrote: > On Sunday 23 November 2014 17:54:21 Milian Wolff wrote: > > On Sunday 23 November 2014 10:39:02 Andreas Pakulat wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 4:36 AM, Milian Wolff wrote: > > > > Hey all, > > > > > > > > in my quest

Re: KF 5.3.0 changelog

On Tuesday, October 07, 2014 22:32:43 Alexander Neundorf wrote: > On Tuesday, October 07, 2014 21:47:07 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > El Dimarts, 7 d'octubre de 2014, a les 21:40:41, Alexander Neundorf va > > > > escriure: > > > Hi, > > > > >

Re: KF 5.3.0 changelog

On Tuesday, October 07, 2014 21:47:07 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El Dimarts, 7 d'octubre de 2014, a les 21:40:41, Alexander Neundorf va > > escriure: > > Hi, > > > > On Monday, October 06, 2014 23:14:33 David Faure wrote: > > > Dear workspace and app

Re: KF 5.3.0 changelog

Hi, On Monday, October 06, 2014 23:14:33 David Faure wrote: > Dear workspace and application developers, > > In case you're not reading kde-announce, here's the list of changes in > KF 5.3.0, just released. I also read https://dot.kde.org/2014/10/07/third-release-kde-frameworks-brings-multitud

Re: Using Gerrit for code review in KDE

On Tuesday, September 09, 2014 20:02:55 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > On Tuesday, September 9, 2014 18.49:24 Kevin Ottens wrote: > > > As it stands with plasma-framework in particular, there is now a > > > difference > > > in workflow depending on what *part* of plasma one is working on > > > (framework

Re: KDE Frameworks Release Cycle

On Sunday, May 04, 2014 16:27:44 Luigi Toscano wrote: > Kevin Ottens ha scritto: > > So, we had a team discussion here with Albert, Aleix, Alex, Alex, > > Aurélien, > > David, Rohan and myself. We juggled with several options, trying to > > address > > > > the following constraints: > > * We don'

Re: Co-installability

On Tuesday, April 29, 2014 21:00:57 Christoph Feck wrote: > I cannot remember we had these issues with the KDE3->KDE4 transition. Actually I think we had the same issues. Vaing said that, especially now with frameworks part of the plan is to make it easy to use just some libraries e.g. in an othe

Re: KDE Frameworks: Moving toward 5.0 final and Governance

On Monday 06 January 2014, Kevin Ottens wrote: > Hello all, > > Now that TP1 is almost out of the door, it is time to move toward the final > release and put in place the governance of KDE Frameworks. It is a very > large and multi-faceted product, so we will need people with longer term > commitm

Re: [kdesrc-build] /: Add kate to kdesrc-build's kf5 file.

On Wednesday 01 January 2014, David Faure wrote: > Git commit f878d229011a8fe673329c44382bd8a43644e595 by David Faure. > Committed on 01/01/2014 at 10:00. > Pushed by dfaure into branch 'master'. > > Add kate to kdesrc-build's kf5 file. > > Try to split up the file internally into 3 sections: > f

Re: Nepomuk in 4.13 and beyond

On Thursday 12 December 2013, Ignacio Serantes wrote: > Welcome Baloo, > > New suggestions about development direction to avoid some problems related > to Nepomuk: > > 1) Baloo must work as a service to share information with other users and > minimize resources consumption. With Nepomuk a login

Re: Less time for KDE... :-)

On Saturday 23 November 2013, Alexander Neundorf wrote: > Hi, > > for very happy personal reasons (since Tuesday, named David :-) ) I'll have > significantly less time for KDE in the future. > Still I'll stick around and try my best. > > Alex > > P.S. no, it

Re: KMountPoint::probablySlow and cifs mount points

On Tuesday 26 November 2013, Thomas Lübking wrote: > On Montag, 25. November 2013 23:31:59 CEST, Alexander Neundorf wrote: > > hmm, doesn't have to be really complicated, just a little bit more > > sophisticated than it is now, e.g. like the following, which is > &

Re: KMountPoint::probablySlow and cifs mount points

On Monday 25 November 2013, Aurélien Gâteau wrote: > Le lundi 25 novembre 2013 13:54:38 Mark Gaiser a écrit : > > On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Aurélien Gâteau wrote: > > > Le dimanche 24 novembre 2013 19:42:25 Mark Gaiser a écrit : ... > > >> What should be done is detecting is the target is

Less time for KDE... :-)

Hi, for very happy personal reasons (since Tuesday, named David :-) ) I'll have significantly less time for KDE in the future. Still I'll stick around and try my best. Alex P.S. no, it is not because of dfaure ;-)

Re: FindKDE4Internal.cmake & clang & c++11 & -fdelayed-template-parsing

On Friday 15 November 2013, Milian Wolff wrote: > On Tuesday 22 October 2013 10:17:02 Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote: > > Milian Wolff writes: > > > Hey Raphael! > > > > > > Thank you for working on clang support in FindKDE4Internal.cmake. > > > > > > Since recently though I have build issues with

Re: Dependency to unreleased versions

On Sunday 20 October 2013, Torgny Nyblom wrote: > Hi, > > What is the policy of depending on unreleased libraries? And is that > written down somewhere? > > Reason I'm asking is this commit > http://build.kde.org/view/FAILED/job/libkdcraw_master/83/changes#detail1 > > It introduces a dependency

Re: KF5 Update Meeting Minutes 2013-w42

On Tuesday 15 October 2013, Kevin Ottens wrote: > Hello everyone, .. > * steveire recommends _LIBRARIES variables from Config files and the > template, Is there a verb missing in this sentence ? Alex

Re: Packaging KDE Foundation 5 frameworks

On Thursday 10 October 2013, Milian Wolff wrote: > On Wednesday 09 October 2013 19:26:48 Alexander Neundorf wrote: > > On Wednesday 09 October 2013, Lubomir Rintel wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I know it's a bit too early, but still better than late. I

Re: Packaging KDE Foundation 5 frameworks

On Wednesday 09 October 2013, Lubomir Rintel wrote: > Hi, > > I know it's a bit too early, but still better than late. I'd like to > know your thoughts about the way KF5 frameworks will be packaged for > Linux distributions. > > I'm currently working on including Hawaii desktop (based around a Qt

Re: Regression in CMake breaking builds

On Sunday 15 September 2013, Ben Cooksley wrote: > On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 10:52 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote: > > On Sunday 15 September 2013, Ben Cooksley wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> It appears that a recent update to CMake on build.kde.org has

Re: Regression in CMake breaking builds

On Sunday 15 September 2013, Ben Cooksley wrote: > Hi all, > > It appears that a recent update to CMake on build.kde.org has broken a > number of KDE projects, resulting in them now failing to build. > > An example can be found here: > http://build.kde.org/view/FAILED/job/kdevplatform_master/560/

Re: KF5 Update Meeting Minutes 2013-w35

On Tuesday 27 August 2013, Kevin Ottens wrote: > Hello everyone, > > This is the minutes of the Week 35 KF5 meeting. As usual it has been held > on #kde-devel at 4pm Paris time. > > Were present: afiestas, apol, d_ed, dfaure, mck182, mgraesslin, sebas, > shadeslayer, teo, vHanda, wojtask9 and mys

Re: KF5 Update Meeting Minutes 2013-w31

On Tuesday 30 July 2013, Kevin Ottens wrote: > Hello everyone, > > This is the minutes of the Week 31 KF5 meeting. As usual it has been held > on #kde-devel at 4pm Paris time. > > Were present: afiestas, agateau, apol, ben2367, d_ed, dfaure, mck182, > mgraesslin, miroslav, sebas, steveire, teo, w

Re: Review Request 111633: Update announced KDE version / required Qt version

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111633/#review36326 --- Ship it! Yes, it was simply forgotten. - Alexander Neundorf

Re: Supported Compilers / C++11 Support in KF5

On Sunday 21 July 2013, Rolf Eike Beer wrote: > Am Sonntag, 21. Juli 2013, 14:11:07 schrieb Volker Krause: > > On Sunday 21 July 2013 13:52:06 Rolf Eike Beer wrote: > > > Volker Krause wrote: > > > > - GCC >= 4.5 > > > > > > > > - override > > > > > > Explicit virtual overrides require g++ 4.7: >

Re: KDE/4.11 branched what to do with kde-workspace?

On Thursday 18 July 2013, Sebastian Kügler wrote: > Hey, > > On Tuesday, July 16, 2013 22:03:51 Alexander Neundorf wrote: > > On Tuesday 16 July 2013, Martin Graesslin wrote: > > > On Monday 15 July 2013 14:42:14 Sebastian Kügler wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, July

Re: KDE/4.11 branched what to do with kde-workspace?

On Tuesday 16 July 2013, Martin Graesslin wrote: > On Monday 15 July 2013 14:42:14 Sebastian Kügler wrote: > > Hey, > > > > On Tuesday, July 09, 2013 18:57:41 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > > So the kde-workspace dudes decided they don't want a 4.12 release and > > > that they'll do a LTS 4.11, fine

Re: Releases in 3 months

On Thursday 11 July 2013, andrea diamantini wrote: > What about a single official development branch? > Just use two branches: > - master branch (stable) > - kdevel branch (devel) > You develop wherever you like and push things on "kdevel" branch when > ready. If you like the "one branch approach",

Re: openSUSE packagers' take on the 3 month release cycle

On Tuesday 09 July 2013, Àlex Fiestas wrote: > On Monday 08 July 2013 20:35:22 Luca Beltrame wrote: > > (apologies for breaking your threading, but I'm not subscribed to k-c-d; > > in fact, please CC me with replies, thanks!) > > > > Currently, the people working on openSUSE packages are against t

Re: openSUSE packagers' take on the 3 month release cycle

On Tuesday 09 July 2013, Àlex Fiestas wrote: ... > What we need then is: > -Be Have a strict policy on using always using find_package if somewhere a package which is used without being searched for this is and always was a build system bug. Alex

Re: openSUSE packagers' take on the 3 month release cycle

On Tuesday 09 July 2013, Àlex Fiestas wrote: > On Tuesday 09 July 2013 13:50:59 Harald Sitter wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > > On Tuesday 09 July 2013 06:33:21 Scott Kitterman wrote: > > >> On Tuesday, July 09, 2013 12:05:30 PM Àlex Fiestas wrote: > > >> > O

Re: openSUSE packagers' take on the 3 month release cycle

On Tuesday 09 July 2013, Scott Kitterman wrote: > On Tuesday, July 09, 2013 12:05:30 PM Àlex Fiestas wrote: > > On Monday 08 July 2013 22:01:29 Andrea Scarpino wrote: > > > We don't just run a sed rule on each spec (pkgbuild, in my case) file. > > > We check for new dependencies (resp. dependencies

Re: Releases in 3 months

On Tuesday 09 July 2013, Andras Mantia wrote: > Hi, > > [...] (just replying at some point) > > > Two point I want to mention: > 1) working in a branch for kdepim is quite painful, as you need actually > work on branches of 3 (or sometimes 4) modules: kdepimlibs, > kdepim-runtime, kdepim (and ak

Re: Releases in 3 months

On Tuesday 09 July 2013, Sven Brauch wrote: > I think Nuno's point is very interesting and worth thinking about. To > stick with the firefox example, since they started releasing every > ortography fix in the settings dialog as a new major version, I think > attention in the media to their releases

Re: kdeinit vs. link order

On Monday 08 July 2013, Thomas Lübking wrote: > Escalating to the High Council. > --- > > > KWin needs[1] to set some environment variables before libGL is > instantiated. This used to be done by an extra shared object at the end of > the link order. > > While i'm not sure whether the curren

Re: KF5 Update Meeting Minutes 2013-w27

On Tuesday 02 July 2013, Alexander Neundorf wrote: > On Tuesday 02 July 2013, Kevin Ottens wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > > > This is the minutes of the Week 27 KF5 meeting. As usual it has been held > > on #kde-devel at 4pm Paris time. > > > > Were

Re: KF5 Update Meeting Minutes 2013-w27

On Tuesday 02 July 2013, Kevin Ottens wrote: > Hello everyone, > > This is the minutes of the Week 27 KF5 meeting. As usual it has been held > on #kde-devel at 4pm Paris time. > > Were present: apol, ben2367, dfaure, R_Rios, sandsmark, scarpino, sebas, > wojtask9 and myself. > > Topics discussed

Re: KF5 Update Meeting Minutes 2013-w27

On Tuesday 02 July 2013, Kevin Ottens wrote: > Hello everyone, > > This is the minutes of the Week 27 KF5 meeting. As usual it has been held > on #kde-devel at 4pm Paris time. > > Were present: apol, ben2367, dfaure, R_Rios, sandsmark, scarpino, sebas, > wojtask9 and myself. ... > * [steveire] i

Re: Review Request 111050: Fast mime detection speedup.

On Sunday 30 June 2013, Mark Gaiser wrote: > > On June 24, 2013, 9:19 a.m., David Faure wrote: > > > kdecore/services/kmimetype.cpp, line 316 > > > > > line316> > > > > > > I can't review this. It completely forks an exi

Re: Review Request 111072: Drop internal X11 cmake module

peril. - Alexander Neundorf On June 17, 2013, 3:35 p.m., Andrea Scarpino wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://git.reviewboard

Re: Review Request 111072: Drop internal X11 cmake module

> On June 17, 2013, 6:34 p.m., Alexander Neundorf wrote: > > No other changes at all necessary ? > > Andrea Scarpino wrote: > kdelibs does not use any of the variables listed in the ECM_SiC page Then it's pro

Re: Review Request 111068: Drop internal Msgfmt cmake module

ly generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111068/ > --- > > (Updated June 17, 2013, 3:26 p.m.) > > > Review request for kdelibs and Alexander Neundorf. > > > Description > --- > > Use GETTEXT_MSGFMT_EXECUTABLE from #FindGe

Re: Review Request 111067: Drop internal Flex cmake module

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111067/#review34514 --- Ship it! - Alexander Neundorf On June 17, 2013, 3:21 p.m

Re: Review Request 111072: Drop internal X11 cmake module

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111072/#review34519 --- No other changes at all necessary ? - Alexander Neundorf On

Re: Review Request 111071: Drop internal RUBY cmake module

/ECM_SourceIncompatChanges#FindRUBY.cmake lists a few changes, but there are none in this patch. So it is not used at all within kdelibs ? - Alexander Neundorf On June 17, 2013, 3:30 p.m., Andrea Scarpino wrote: > > --- > This is an auto

Re: Review Request 111070: Drop internal PostgreSQL cmake module

/Development/ECM_SourceIncompatChanges#FindPostgreSQL.cmake lists a few renamed variables, but there are no such changes in this patch ? - Alexander Neundorf On June 17, 2013, 3:27 p.m., Andrea Scarpino wrote: > > --- > T

Re: Review Request 111068: Drop internal Msgfmt cmake module

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/111068/#review34515 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Alexander Neundorf On June 17, 2013, 3

Re: KF5 Update Meeting 2013-w20

On Monday 03 June 2013, Christophe Giboudeaux wrote: > On Monday 03 June 2013 12:34:46 David Faure wrote: > > On Monday 20 May 2013 11:53:18 Alexander Neundorf wrote: > > > there was a review request for a find-module for libusb1 here a few > > > days ago, which we ha

Re: KF5 Update Meeting 2013-w20

On Monday 03 June 2013, Christophe Giboudeaux wrote: > On Monday 03 June 2013 12:34:46 David Faure wrote: > > On Monday 20 May 2013 11:53:18 Alexander Neundorf wrote: > > > there was a review request for a find-module for libusb1 here a few > > > days ago, which we ha

Re: KDE Workspace broken due to upstream CMake changes

On Monday 27 May 2013, Ben Cooksley wrote: > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 7:37 AM, Alexander Neundorf wrote: > > On Monday 27 May 2013, Rolf Eike Beer wrote: > >> Am 27.05.2013 09:13, schrieb Ben Cooksley: > >> > Hi all, > >> > > >> > It seems

Re: KDE Workspace broken due to upstream CMake changes

On Monday 27 May 2013, Rolf Eike Beer wrote: > Am 27.05.2013 09:13, schrieb Ben Cooksley: > > Hi all, > > > > It seems that a recent upstream change in CMake has now broken the > > build of KDE Workspace. Can someone please fix or prod CMake upstream > > into revising their policies? > > > > The

Re: Review Request 110563: Crash fix: hide symbols from static lib QtUitools.a (generically by new macro KDE4_HIDE_SYMBOLS_FROM_STATIC_LIBS)

FindKDE4Internal.cmake, where all the documentation is. For the technical side: this flag is new to me. Is it the only possible solution ? Thiago ? - Alexander Neundorf On May 22, 2013, 11:19 a.m., Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote

Re: KF5 Update Meeting 2013-w20

On Sunday 19 May 2013, Stephen Kelly wrote: > Alexander Neundorf wrote: > > On Thursday 16 May 2013, Stephen Kelly wrote: > >> Kevin Ottens wrote: > >> >> Beside that, I would like if we could do a release of > >> >> extra-cmake-modules as soon as

Re: KF5 Update Meeting 2013-w20

On Thursday 16 May 2013, Stephen Kelly wrote: > Kevin Ottens wrote: > >> Beside that, I would like if we could do a release of > >> extra-cmake-modules as soon as possible, so other projects, KDE and > >> non-KDE can start to make use of it and people can start to contribute. > > > > I guess that

Re: macro_log_feature : setting max version

On Thursday 16 May 2013, Valentin Rusu wrote: > Hello, > > This issue is triggered by kopete's OTR plugin that stopped compiling with > LibOTR 4.0.0 because it undergone some imported structure changes. > > Pali Rohar managed to modify the FindLibOTR.cmake, we now set-up a version > range startin

Re: KF5 Update Meeting 2013-w20

On Thursday 16 May 2013, Kevin Ottens wrote: > On Wednesday 15 May 2013 21:07:43 Alexander Neundorf wrote: > > On Wednesday 15 May 2013, Kevin Ottens wrote: > > > Hello all, > > > > > > So yesterday 4pm (Paris timezone :p) as planned we had the first update

Re: KF5 Update Meeting 2013-w20

On Wednesday 15 May 2013, Kevin Ottens wrote: > Hello all, > > So yesterday 4pm (Paris timezone :p) as planned we had the first update is it planned to have those meetings sometimes also later in the day ? At 4pm I'm at work, and so can't attend. ... > Action items: > * [ervin] Send meeting rem

Re: Review Request 110271: libusb-1 support in kcmusb (kinfocenter)

On Sunday 12 May 2013, Max Brazhnikov wrote: > > On May 12, 2013, 9:21 a.m., Alexander Neundorf wrote: > > > There is a Find-module for libusb in extra-cmake-modules. > > > As long as this is not released yet, please use a copy from the one > > > over there: >

Re: Review Request 110271: libusb-1 support in kcmusb (kinfocenter)

long as this is not released yet, please use a copy from the one over there: http://quickgit.kde.org/?p=extra-cmake-modules.git&a=blob&h=eba47115f94cc2eb969f19166d6664b300864a30&hb=316c7756ec1b0745f518d2f9af139812c3c5a24f&f=find-modules%2FFindLibUSB1.cmake - Alexander Neundorf On

Re: Plasma Workspaces 4.11: the last feature release in the 4.xseries for kde-workspace

On Sunday 05 May 2013, Martin Graesslin wrote: ... > As I already wrote in my last mail to this thread: yes everybody knows your > opinion of how kdelibs freeze should be handled. Repeating it in every > single thread which might even be slightly related to the freeze, won't > change anything. All

Re: filter unwated cflags? (-ffast-math)

On Wednesday 17 April 2013, Michael Pyne wrote: > On Tue, April 16, 2013 20:29:25 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > El Dimarts, 16 d'abril de 2013, a les 16:39:32, Bernd Buschinski va > > escriure: > > > hi, > > > > Hi > > > > > I am not sure how do deal with unwanted cflags(cxxflags), so I ask here

Fwd: [CMake] CMake 2.8.11-rc1 ready for testing

Hi, the first RC for CMake 2.8.11 has been released. Please give it good testing, it contains lots of changes in the core. Btw. Steveire is this time leading the commit statistics :-) Alex -- Forwarded Message -- Subject: [CMake] CMake 2.8.11-rc1 ready for testing Date: Frida

Re: Review Request 108889: Add QML_INSTALL_DIR variable to KDE pathes

On Sunday 10 February 2013, Sebastian Kügler wrote: > > On Feb. 10, 2013, 3:40 p.m., David Faure wrote: > > > kde-modules/KDEInstallDirs.cmake, line 136 > > > > > line136> > > > > > > For an install prefix in /usr, this

Re: Review Request 108889: Add QML_INSTALL_DIR variable to KDE pathes

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108889/#review27131 --- Ship it! Looks good. - Alexander Neundorf On Feb. 10

Re: Removing WinCE support

On Thursday 10 May 2012, Alexander Neundorf wrote: > On Thursday 10 May 2012, Volker Krause wrote: > > On Wednesday 09 May 2012 16:47:17 Stephen Kelly wrote: > > > Alexander Neundorf wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > KDAB made kdelibs in som

Re: Review Request 106861: Add pkgconfig hints to FindSamba.cmake

? Where is the non-standard location which needs to be searched in your case ? - Alexander Neundorf On Jan. 31, 2013, 4:58 p.m., Rex Dieter wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visi

Re: Review Request 108592: Added some more operations in analitza

On Sunday 27 January 2013, David Faure wrote: > On Saturday 26 January 2013 20:35:46 Alexander Neundorf wrote: > > On Saturday 26 January 2013, Heena Mahour wrote: > > > --- > > > This is an automatically genera

  1   2   3   4   >