On 04/11/24 12:49 am, Ingo Klöcker wrote:
KDE's Licensing Policy (https://community.kde.org/Policies/Licensing_Policy)
doesn't list the MPL(2.0) as allowed license for "source code and related data
files in KDE repositories".
This doesn't mean that we couldn't allow the MPL2.0 for Rust bindings
On Sat, Nov 9, 2024 at 7:20 AM Tomaz Canabrava wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, 4 Nov 2024 at 09:51 Sune Vuorela wrote:
>>
>> On 2024-11-03, Neal Gompa wrote:
>> > It's not that simple. The reason I suggested MPL-2.0 is because
>> > LGPL-2.1-or-later is effectively the same as GPL-2.0-or-later with
>> > R
On Mon, 4 Nov 2024 at 09:51 Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On 2024-11-03, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > It's not that simple. The reason I suggested MPL-2.0 is because
> > LGPL-2.1-or-later is effectively the same as GPL-2.0-or-later with
> > Rust because it's statically linked.
> >
people lgpl does not forbid
