Git commit 426b91e5d9e42a875d4afadc715eda93ce88ebec by Ben Cooksley.
Committed on 30/12/2019 at 17:31.
Pushed by bcooksley into branch 'master'.
Move Ikona to KDE Review
Fixes T12449
CCMAIL: kde-core-devel@kde.org
R +0-0projects/kdereview/ikona/i18n.json [from:
projects/playground/sdk
Hi Steve,
Stephen Kelly schrieb am Mo., 30. Dez. 2019, 11:57:
>
> On 30/12/2019 10:55, Christoph Cullmann wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >>> With my KTextEditor hat on: KF6:TextDocument implies somehow a link
> >>> to QTextDocument or KF6:TextEditor, which both is incorrect, right?
> >>
> >> QTextDocument
On 30/12/2019 10:55, Christoph Cullmann wrote:
Hi,
With my KTextEditor hat on: KF6:TextDocument implies somehow a link
to QTextDocument or KF6:TextEditor, which both is incorrect, right?
QTextDocument is exactly what it's about, which makes the name
KF6::TextDocument fully appropriate and c
Hi,
With my KTextEditor hat on: KF6:TextDocument implies somehow a link
to QTextDocument or KF6:TextEditor, which both is incorrect, right?
QTextDocument is exactly what it's about, which makes the name
KF6::TextDocument fully appropriate and correct.
Before starting this work, let's clarify
On 30/12/2019 08:55, Dominik Haumann wrote:
Hi,
Stephen Kelly mailto:steve...@gmail.com>> schrieb
am So., 29. Dez. 2019, 15:03:
On 28/12/2019 23:30, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
> Why are you proposing to do a step back instead to the old
state, which
> everyone including
Hi,
Stephen Kelly schrieb am So., 29. Dez. 2019, 15:03:
>
> On 28/12/2019 23:30, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
> > Why are you proposing to do a step back instead to the old state, which
> > everyone including you considered not that satisfying?
>
> Because it's a temporary situation. We still
