Re: CMake config & target challenges on moving to KF5 namespace; dir structure & API dox (Re: Submitting Grantlee as a KF5 Framework)

2019-12-22 Thread Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
Am Sonntag, 22. Dezember 2019, 17:08:15 CET schrieb Stephen Kelly: > On 21/12/2019 23:55, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: > > Perhaps joining the "Release Service" (formerly known as "KDE > > Applications") is a better place then, it also contains a set of > > libraries already. That would serve th

Re: CMake config & target challenges on moving to KF5 namespace; dir structure & API dox (Re: Submitting Grantlee as a KF5 Framework)

2019-12-22 Thread Stephen Kelly
On 21/12/2019 23:55, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: Perhaps joining the "Release Service" (formerly known as "KDE Applications") is a better place then, it also contains a set of libraries already. That would serve the purpose of having releases happening regularly. The goals of making Gran

Re: CMake config & target challenges on moving to KF5 namespace; dir structure & API dox (Re: Submitting Grantlee as a KF5 Framework)

2019-12-22 Thread Dominik Haumann
Hi all, in any case, maybe the discussed points should go to the KF6 workboard? https://phabricator.kde.org/project/view/310/ I indeed believe that consistency in the KF5 world is an important feature, so Friedrich does have a point here. Other framework additions had to adapt as well (what comes