Re: Python bindings using cppyy (was: An update on Python bindings)

El dissabte, 13 de gener de 2018, a les 18:05:45 CET, Shaheed Haque va escriure: > Thanks to some upstream fixes, I have the cppyy-based bindings for KF5 and > also Qt5 (see below) showing signs of life. > Notes: This is awesome, i'm really happy we're in a point that framework-by-framework is

Re: Rebase of kopete branch and push it to master

El diumenge, 14 de gener de 2018, a les 21:52:29 CET, Pali Rohár va escriure: > Hi! Hello Mr Rohár > > From the following ticket https://phabricator.kde.org/T7642 I was > suggested to open discussion on kde-core-devel list. Sending this email > also to kopete-devel as it is relevant for Kopete d

plasma-active-window-control - was -Re: 2 New Plasmoids in Kdereview

El dissabte, 13 de gener de 2018, a les 10:46:01 CET, Martin Kostolný va escriure: > 2) On the other hand plasma-active-window-control could be part of > kdeplasma-addons because it is multiplatform, has C++ plugin and uses e.g. > TaskManager module of Plasma which changes from time to time. So it

Rebase of kopete branch and push it to master

Hi! From the following ticket https://phabricator.kde.org/T7642 I was suggested to open discussion on kde-core-devel list. Sending this email also to kopete-devel as it is relevant for Kopete development. Currently in Kopete git repository https://cgit.kde.org/kopete.git/ is a branch kf5 which co

Re: KDE inclusion

Michael Reeves ha scritto: > Sorry meant this to go to everyone. > > I did this based off what Ubuntu was using at the time.  The repo is here > https://bitbucket.org/reporter123/kdiff3 > . Master is currently set the > require CMake 3.1 but as of this mom

Re: New KDE application

Adding other lists. On 10-Jan-2018 11:49 PM, "Sayan Biswas" wrote: > Hi, > > A very happy new year to all. Hope you guys are doing good. :) > > Me and Rahul (CC'ed; IRC nick - rahulch) came up with an idea for a > new application in KDE, and we were hoping to get an opinion on it. > > The centra

Re: 2 New Plasmoids in Kdereview

(it seems my last mail didn't get to kde-core-devel, so here it it with an update) Hi Ben, Ingo, that is right, my previous mail (from the night 2018-01-11) was my first mail to kde-core-devel, which was done based on mentioned point 3 under kdereview section. The reason I did that after this

Re: Re: KDE inclusion

Fixed local file handling prevented merges from being saved. Thin rapper class created to insure scheme is never blank. QUrl::isLocal returns false in this case. On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 2:47 AM, Michael Reeves wrote: > Looks the original is a somewhat modified version of be348bcf1. It doesn't >

Re: Re: KDE inclusion

Looks the original is a somewhat modified version of be348bcf1. It doesn't have some of the windows specific code. Also kreplacements was not always patched when updating code. I'm working on getting it updated with changes Joachim has made. On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 12:21 AM, Joachim Eibl wrote:

Aw: Re: KDE inclusion

Hi,   It's great to hear there is some ongoing effort to port KDiff3 to KF5. Thanks for informing me. I had a try at it myself, but was quite overwhelmed about the big changes in KF5.   You have my blessing to use the name KDiff3.   @Michael: It seems the repo at https://bitbucket.org/repo

Re: 2 New Plasmoids in Kdereview

Hi Ben, Ingo, that is right, the previous mail (from yesterday's night) was my first mail to kde-core-devel, which was done based on mentioned point 3 under kdereview section. The reason I did that after this long was actually I wasn't sure what to do (to pass incubation/review) after my proje

Re: KDE inclusion

Sorry meant this to go to everyone. I did this based off what Ubuntu was using at the time. The repo is here https://bitbucket.org/reporter123/kdiff3. Master is currently set the require CMake 3.1 but as of this moment that is just a number change. My concern here was C++11 feature dectect which