Exactly.
On 23 May 2017 at 20:40, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> El dimarts, 23 de maig de 2017, a les 2:04:54 CEST, Aleix Pol va escriure:
>> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 7:54 PM, Shaheed Haque wrote:
>> > On 21 May 2017 at 22:27, Aleix Pol wrote:
>> >> On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 7:41 PM, Shaheed Haque
>
> I don't understand what you're trying to do.
Me neither :-). Let me take a step back to try to provide some
context. It is my assessment that part of the problem with the
maintenance of bindings has been the lack of automation both in
support of the initial development of the bindings, and then
El dimarts, 23 de maig de 2017, a les 2:04:54 CEST, Aleix Pol va escriure:
> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 7:54 PM, Shaheed Haque wrote:
> > On 21 May 2017 at 22:27, Aleix Pol wrote:
> >> On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 7:41 PM, Shaheed Haque
wrote:
> >>> Actually, there is one thing about "target CMake"-bas
On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 12:52 PM, Volker Krause wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we have talked about the above topics a couple of times in the past, from what
> I remember usually agreeing it would be nice to have some more statistical
> information about our users, so we know what our applications are used for,
On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 7:16 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> if("${CMAKE_SOURCE_DIR}" STREQUAL "${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}")
>message(FATAL_ERROR "climbinggrades bla bla bla.")
> endif()
>
> This is not climbinggrades ;)
thanks, fixed
--
Marco Martin
