Re: kapidox: supporting also QML (and cmake, Python,, ...)

2016-08-01 Thread Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
Am Montag, 1. August 2016, 20:59:03 CEST schrieb Olivier Churlaud: > Le 01/08/2016 à 19:50, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau a écrit : > > Hi, Olivier and all, > > > > picking up from the short chat on #plasma today: > > > > so given kapidox is overcoming the old API dox generating scripts with > > more

Re: kapidox: supporting also QML (and cmake, Python,, ...)

2016-08-01 Thread Ingo Klöcker
On Monday 01 August 2016 20:59:03 Olivier Churlaud wrote: > > For a solution: > > Perhaps at the generation side there could be another level right > > below the library, for the interface (C++, QML, CMake, ...). > > So "Product" > "Library" > "Interface", > > > > By the example of Plasma Componen

Re: kapidox: supporting also QML (and cmake, Python,, ...)

2016-08-01 Thread Olivier Churlaud
Hi, I tried to address each point raised here. Don't hesitate to criticize or questions my answers and even propose something else. I try to find the best solutions but it doesn't mean my solutions are actually the best. Le 01/08/2016 à 19:50, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau a écrit : Hi, Olivier a

kapidox: supporting also QML (and cmake, Python,, ...)

2016-08-01 Thread Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
Hi, Olivier and all, picking up from the short chat on #plasma today: so given kapidox is overcoming the old API dox generating scripts with more proper semantic info... where the old scripts allowed to use random Mainpage.dox at random places in the directories to structure the created documen