Re: Review of special packager access

2016-07-08 Thread Ben Cooksley
On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 5:07 AM, Michael Palimaka wrote: > Hi Ben, Hi Michael, > > On 08/07/16 21:39, Ben Cooksley wrote: >> I'd therefore like for someone from each distribution to please >> confirm that their distro is still active and who can serve as a >> general point of contact for that dis

Re: Review of special packager access

2016-07-08 Thread Ben Cooksley
On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 2:49 AM, Eric Hameleers wrote: > On Fri, 8 Jul 2016, Ben Cooksley wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> My apologies if you're not a packager or someone associated with a >> distribution - you can ignore this email. Packagers, please read on as >> this contains important details. >> >>

Re: Review of special packager access

2016-07-08 Thread Ben Cooksley
On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 2:32 AM, Nicolas Lécureuil wrote: > Le 2016-07-08 13:39, Ben Cooksley a écrit : >> >> Hi all, >> >> My apologies if you're not a packager or someone associated with a >> distribution - you can ignore this email. Packagers, please read on as >> this contains important details

Re: Review of special packager access

2016-07-08 Thread Ben Cooksley
On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 12:41 AM, Philip Muskovac wrote: > Hi Ben, Hi Philip, > > for Ubuntu I would be the relevant contact until someone says otherwise and > we're very much still there ;) Thanks, has been noted. > > While I'll look at the old keys soon, would it help you if we put a > #Conta

Review of special packager access

2016-07-08 Thread Ben Cooksley
Hi all, My apologies if you're not a packager or someone associated with a distribution - you can ignore this email. Packagers, please read on as this contains important details. First: If you're a packager, please ensure you are subscribed to kde-distro-packag...@kde.org, which is our usual list