El diumenge, 3 d’abril de 2016, a les 23:04:48 CEST, Ingo Klöcker va escriure:
> On Sunday 03 April 2016 20:27:27 Shaheed Haque wrote:
> > What seems to be causing ripples is my suggestion that I call the
> > *tool* to create the SIP files something relating to PyKDE5. That made
> > sense to me sin
On Sunday 03 April 2016 20:27:27 Shaheed Haque wrote:
> What seems to be causing ripples is my suggestion that I call the
> *tool* to create the SIP files something relating to PyKDE5. That made
> sense to me since the tools is all about making SIP wrappers for all
> of KDE(5) that wants them. Simi
On 3 April 2016 at 17:58, Philipp A. wrote:
> super cool!
>
> replacing the current PyKF5 repo (and naming it PyKF5 surely is a
> possibility?
Calling the python version of KF5 PyKF5 is not the question; we are
all agreed that is the right thing.
What seems to be causing ripples is my suggestion
On 1 April 2016 at 23:18, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> El dijous, 31 de març de 2016, a les 23:04:07 CEST, Shaheed Haque va escriure:
>> Thanks for all the feedback. Here is what I am thinking:
>>
>> - The basic tooling might as well keep the PyKDE5 name because the
>> tool is intended to be used KD
