---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127515/#review94101
---
+1 LGTM
- Aleix Pol Gonzalez
On March 28, 2016, 6:06 p.m.,
Hi all,
According to the build metadata the 'master' branch of
libkdeaccessibilityclient is supposed to be buildable with Qt 4.
Unfortunately it fails to compile due to usage of QStringLiteral,
which was introduced in Qt 5.
Can someone please take a look at it, either correcting the code or
build
GENERAL INFO
BUILD UNSTABLE
Build URL:
https://build.kde.org/job/kdelibs%20KDE-4.14%20stable-qt4/PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=gcc/4/
Project: PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=gcc
Date of build: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 00:52:32 +
Build duration: 33 min
CHANGE SET
No changes
JUNIT RESULTS
Name: (root)
GENERAL INFO
BUILD UNSTABLE
Build URL:
https://build.kde.org/job/kdelibs%20KDE-4.14%20latest-qt4/PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=gcc/4/
Project: PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=gcc
Date of build: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 00:52:34 +
Build duration: 12 min
CHANGE SET
No changes
JUNIT RESULTS
Name: (root)
Hi all,
Due to dependency conflicts between libraptor and dependencies of
Oyranos, kolor-manager's builds for all Qt 4 variants have now been
removed. libraptor is a dependency of Soprano, and thus kdelibs, while
Oyranos is a dependency of kolor-manager.
Regards,
Ben
GENERAL INFO
BUILD FAILURE
Build URL:
https://build.kde.org/job/kdelibs%20KDE-4.14%20stable-qt4/PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=gcc/3/
Project: PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=gcc
Date of build: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 21:09:03 +
Build duration: 17 min
CHANGE SET
Revision 23f0972e03d9d5f30412b7c9c74cb4cadef7293a
GENERAL INFO
BUILD FAILURE
Build URL:
https://build.kde.org/job/kdelibs%20KDE-4.14%20latest-qt4/PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=gcc/3/
Project: PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=gcc
Date of build: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 21:09:03 +
Build duration: 16 min
CHANGE SET
Revision 23f0972e03d9d5f30412b7c9c74cb4cadef7293a
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> laurent Montel wrote:
>> Oh?:)
>> Fedora continue to support some programs which are not supported from
>> several years before kdepim5 ?
>
> Fedora would not have to do that if you were not removing functionality as
> large as entire applica
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127515/
---
Review request for KDE Base Apps and David Faure.
Repository: kde-baseapp
