Re: [Kde-pim] Qt 4 Builds

2016-03-27 Thread laurent Montel
Le lundi 28 mars 2016, 00:50:20 CEST Kevin Kofler a écrit : > laurent Montel wrote: > > Oh?:) > > Fedora continue to support some programs which are not supported from > > several years before kdepim5 ? > > Fedora would not have to do that if you were not removing functionality as > large as entir

Re: [Kde-pim] Qt 4 Builds

2016-03-27 Thread Scarlett Clark
Thank you all for your input. We have decided to remove all Qt4 builds that a) Have a kf5 version in Release. b) Not actively developed. This thread is ONLY about KDE CI builds. Nothing else. Thank you Scarlett On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 3:50 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > laurent Montel wrote: > > Oh?:

Re: [Kde-pim] Qt 4 Builds

2016-03-27 Thread Kevin Kofler
laurent Montel wrote: > Oh?:) > Fedora continue to support some programs which are not supported from > several years before kdepim5 ? Fedora would not have to do that if you were not removing functionality as large as entire applications (!) between releases. Also, KNode still works great, mayb

Re: Qt 4 Builds

2016-03-27 Thread Ben Cooksley
On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 9:03 AM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El diumenge, 27 de març de 2016, a les 10:57:18 CEST, Ben Cooksley va > escriure: >> Hi all, >> >> As part of the CI overhaul, we've attempted to perform a complete set >> of builds for Qt 4, as it's still (unfortunately) used. >> >> Sadl

Re: Qt 4 Builds

2016-03-27 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El diumenge, 27 de març de 2016, a les 10:57:18 CEST, Ben Cooksley va escriure: > Hi all, > > As part of the CI overhaul, we've attempted to perform a complete set > of builds for Qt 4, as it's still (unfortunately) used. > > Sadly, as expected for something nobody has really tried to build for

Re: [Kde-pim] Qt 4 Builds

2016-03-27 Thread Scarlett Clark
On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 11:47 AM, Martin Klapetek wrote: > On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 1:14 PM, Scarlett Clark < > scarlett.gately.cl...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> libaccounts-qt ( ktp stack I believe affected here ) will not build qt4 >> >> https://build.kde.org/job/libaccounts-qt%20master%20latest-q

Re: [Kde-pim] Qt 4 Builds

2016-03-27 Thread Martin Klapetek
On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 1:14 PM, Scarlett Clark < scarlett.gately.cl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > libaccounts-qt ( ktp stack I believe affected here ) will not build qt4 > > https://build.kde.org/job/libaccounts-qt%20master%20latest-qt4/PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=gcc/2/console > Reading the log upstream

Re: [Kde-pim] Qt 4 Builds

2016-03-27 Thread Raymond Wooninck
On Sunday, 27 March 2016 16:19:07 CEST laurent Montel wrote: > > > > The latest openSuse (Leap 42.1) ships the Qt4 based kdepim, although it > > uses plasma5 desktop. > > It's opensuse problem :) > > > Speaking of it: given that openSuse decided against shipping KF5-based > > PIM, > > how stable

Re: [Kde-pim] Qt 4 Builds

2016-03-27 Thread Scarlett Clark
On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 10:20 AM, Kai Uwe Broulik wrote: > Hi, > > > gwenview depends on baloo as well > > isn't Gwenview already released as kf5? At least I've been running it for > years almost without a problem. > > Most of these are. We are talking about the qt4 builds in the CI. Projects hav

Re: [Kde-pim] Qt 4 Builds

2016-03-27 Thread Kai Uwe Broulik
Hi,> gwenview depends on baloo as well isn't Gwenview already released as kf5? At least I've been running it for years almost without a problem. Cheers, Kai Uwe 

Re: [Kde-pim] Qt 4 Builds

2016-03-27 Thread Scarlett Clark
Unrelated to PIM We have others affected by various qt4 unsupported upstream. gwenview depends on baloo as well libaccounts-qt ( ktp stack I believe affected here ) will not build qt4 https://build.kde.org/job/libaccounts-qt%20master%20latest-qt4/PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=gcc/2/console Reading the

Re: [Kde-pim] Qt 4 Builds

2016-03-27 Thread Thiago Macieira
On domingo, 27 de março de 2016 15:31:47 PDT Martin Koller wrote: > The latest openSuse (Leap 42.1) ships the Qt4 based kdepim, although it uses > plasma5 desktop. > > Speaking of it: given that openSuse decided against shipping KF5-based PIM, > how stable is KF5-based PIM considered these days ?

Re: Qt 4 Builds

2016-03-27 Thread Thiago Macieira
On domingo, 27 de março de 2016 10:57:18 PDT Ben Cooksley wrote: > As a general anecdote, the community needs to decide if we are going > to continue releasing and supporting Qt 4 builds at all. Considering > Qt 4 itself is EOL per upstream I believe, I think it's time we > followed suit. Not comp

Re: [Kde-bindings] A new attempt on PyKDE5 binding generation

2016-03-27 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Saturday, March 26, 2016 10:30:18 PM Shaheed Haque wrote: > Hi all, > > I've given up on trying to get the twine2 PyKDE bindings generator > working [1] because not only is the code there broken, but it seems a > Sysiphusian task to maintain a C++ parser. Instead, a few evenings > with clang 3.

Re: A new attempt on PyKDE5 binding generation

2016-03-27 Thread Shaheed Haque
Yes. Generally, The core generator.py can handle anything clang can parse and the idea is that where needed, you'd just add a few rules to the database for any krita-specific hacks needed. In due course, the rules.py could easily be made more separable to separate out what different projects need

Re: [Kde-pim] Qt 4 Builds

2016-03-27 Thread laurent Montel
Le dimanche 27 mars 2016, 15:31:47 CEST Martin Koller a écrit : > On Sunday 27 March 2016 09:21:01 laurent Montel wrote: > > Le dimanche 27 mars 2016, 10:57:18 CEST Ben Cooksley a écrit : > > > Hi all, > > > > > > As part of the CI overhaul, we've attempted to perform a complete set > > > of build

Re: [Kde-pim] Qt 4 Builds

2016-03-27 Thread laurent Montel
Le dimanche 27 mars 2016, 16:08:09 CEST Luigi Toscano a écrit : > laurent Montel ha scritto: > > Le dimanche 27 mars 2016, 14:02:26 CEST Luigi Toscano a écrit : > >> laurent Montel ha scritto: > >>> Le dimanche 27 mars 2016, 11:58:07 CEST Kevin Kofler a écrit : > laurent Montel wrote: > >

Re: [Kde-pim] Qt 4 Builds

2016-03-27 Thread Luigi Toscano
laurent Montel ha scritto: > Le dimanche 27 mars 2016, 14:02:26 CEST Luigi Toscano a écrit : >> laurent Montel ha scritto: >>> Le dimanche 27 mars 2016, 11:58:07 CEST Kevin Kofler a écrit : laurent Montel wrote: > We will not create more release from kdepim4, no distro uses it even > d

Re: [Kde-pim] Qt 4 Builds

2016-03-27 Thread laurent Montel
Le dimanche 27 mars 2016, 14:02:26 CEST Luigi Toscano a écrit : > laurent Montel ha scritto: > > Le dimanche 27 mars 2016, 11:58:07 CEST Kevin Kofler a écrit : > >> laurent Montel wrote: > >>> We will not create more release from kdepim4, no distro uses it even > >>> debian :) > >> > >> Fedora wil

Re: A new attempt on PyKDE5 binding generation

2016-03-27 Thread Boudewijn Rempt
On Sat, 26 Mar 2016, Shaheed Haque wrote: Hi all, I've given up on trying to get the twine2 PyKDE bindings generator working [1] because not only is the code there broken, but it seems a Sysiphusian task to maintain a C++ parser. Instead, a few evenings with clang 3.9 have yielded what I hope i

Re: [Kde-pim] Qt 4 Builds

2016-03-27 Thread Martin Koller
On Sunday 27 March 2016 09:21:01 laurent Montel wrote: > Le dimanche 27 mars 2016, 10:57:18 CEST Ben Cooksley a écrit : > > Hi all, > > > > As part of the CI overhaul, we've attempted to perform a complete set > > of builds for Qt 4, as it's still (unfortunately) used. > > > > Sadly, as expected

Re: [Kde-pim] Qt 4 Builds

2016-03-27 Thread Luigi Toscano
laurent Montel ha scritto: > Le dimanche 27 mars 2016, 11:58:07 CEST Kevin Kofler a écrit : >> laurent Montel wrote: >>> We will not create more release from kdepim4, no distro uses it even >>> debian :) >> >> Fedora will ship (it's currently under review) a kdepim4 package containing >> KNode and

Re: [Kde-pim] Qt 4 Builds

2016-03-27 Thread laurent Montel
Le dimanche 27 mars 2016, 11:58:07 CEST Kevin Kofler a écrit : > laurent Montel wrote: > > We will not create more release from kdepim4, no distro uses it even > > debian :) > > Fedora will ship (it's currently under review) a kdepim4 package containing > KNode and KTimeTracker, which are not incl

Re: [Kde-pim] Qt 4 Builds

2016-03-27 Thread Kevin Kofler
laurent Montel wrote: > We will not create more release from kdepim4, no distro uses it even > debian :) Fedora will ship (it's currently under review) a kdepim4 package containing KNode and KTimeTracker, which are not included in the new KF5 kdepim. Kevin Kofler

Re: A new attempt on PyKDE5 binding generation

2016-03-27 Thread Eike Hein
Hi, exciting work! Just the other day I was hoping someone would pick up work on PyKDE5 ... Cheers, Eike

Re: A new attempt on PyKDE5 binding generation

2016-03-27 Thread Eike Hein
Hi, exciting work! Just the other day I was hoping for someone to take up PyKDE5 ... Cheers, Eike

Re: [Kde-pim] Qt 4 Builds

2016-03-27 Thread laurent Montel
Le dimanche 27 mars 2016, 10:57:18 CEST Ben Cooksley a écrit : > Hi all, > > As part of the CI overhaul, we've attempted to perform a complete set > of builds for Qt 4, as it's still (unfortunately) used. > > Sadly, as expected for something nobody has really tried to build for > ages, many thing