Re: remove khelpcenter from next Plasma release?

2016-03-15 Thread Jeremy Whiting
As an application developer I agree it makes sense to have khelpcenter released with KDE Applications. I also agree with Albert's point that having online documentation isn't the best since it could be newer than what's actually running. People using LTS distributions or "stable" variants of less o

Re: Product versions on bugs.kde.org

2016-03-15 Thread Christoph Feck
On Saturday 12 March 2016 04:02:11 Alexander Potashev wrote: > I felt free and did the following: > > [...] > 7. Created product frameworks-baloo and added > versions 5.13.0+ [4]. Bugs for older, out-of-KF5 versions go into > the "Baloo" product. > > 8. Added product "BalooWidgets", it's part of

Re: remove khelpcenter from next Plasma release?

2016-03-15 Thread Luigi Toscano
Luigi Toscano ha scritto: > On Wednesday 09 of March 2016 16:50:39 Sebastian Kügler wrote: >> On Wednesday, March 09, 2016 17:30:01 Luigi Toscano wrote: Let me cut right to the chase, do you want to maintain it? Does it need to be in Plasma? >>> >>> Yes, I can maintain it. In fact ma

Re: Review Request 127102: Use fixed width for digital clock applet

2016-03-15 Thread Martin Klapetek
> On March 15, 2016, 5:48 p.m., Martin Klapetek wrote: > > I've tested it extensively and it works great. Thanks a lot! > > > > There's one more issue - http://paste.opensuse.org/view/raw/f8ba5d0d - the > > same font size should also be applied to the left date label (there are; > > the bottom

Re: Review Request 127102: Use fixed width for digital clock applet

2016-03-15 Thread Daniel Faust
> On März 15, 2016, 5:48 nachm., Martin Klapetek wrote: > > I've tested it extensively and it works great. Thanks a lot! > > > > There's one more issue - http://paste.opensuse.org/view/raw/f8ba5d0d - the > > same font size should also be applied to the left date label (there are; > > the botto

Re: Review Request 127102: Use fixed width for digital clock applet

2016-03-15 Thread Martin Klapetek
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127102/#review93561 --- I've tested it extensively and it works great. Thanks a lot!