Re: remove khelpcenter from next Plasma release?

2016-03-09 Thread Yuri Chornoivan
написане Wed, 09 Mar 2016 18:24:59 +0200, Martin Klapetek : On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Martin Gräßlin wrote: Am 2016-03-09 16:43, schrieb Yuri Chornoivan: Hi, Just of curiosity, what is the next thing, after documentation (as Plasma almost does not have it), to get rid from Pla

Re: remove khelpcenter from next Plasma release?

2016-03-09 Thread Yuri Chornoivan
написане Wed, 09 Mar 2016 17:29:28 +0200, Sebastian Kügler : Hi all, [For the sake of sanity, please reply to both list, this topic affects applications and Plasma.] One of the topics we are discussing at the current Plasma sprint is whether we really want khelpcenter as part of the Plasma r

Re: Qt5 version of qimageblitz

2016-03-09 Thread Robby Stephenson
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 2:08 AM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > On Wed, 9 Mar 2016, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > I guess for that we need to decide if it should be a framework first or >> not. >> > > Isn't kolourpaint the only user of qimageblitz at the moment? Krita used > to use it, years and years ag

Re: remove khelpcenter from next Plasma release?

2016-03-09 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Wednesday 09 March 2016, a les 15:29:28, Sebastian Kügler va escriure: > Hi all, > > [For the sake of sanity, please reply to both list, this topic affects > applications and Plasma.] > > One of the topics we are discussing at the current Plasma sprint is whether > we really want khelpcenter a

Re: Qt5 version of qimageblitz

2016-03-09 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Wednesday 09 March 2016, a les 13:11:52, Christoph Feck va escriure: > On Wednesday 09 March 2016 08:08:14 Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > > On Wed, 9 Mar 2016, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > > I guess for that we need to decide if it should be a framework > > > first or not. > > > > Isn't kolourpaint t

Re: remove khelpcenter from next Plasma release?

2016-03-09 Thread Luigi Toscano
On Wednesday 09 of March 2016 16:50:39 Sebastian Kügler wrote: > On Wednesday, March 09, 2016 17:30:01 Luigi Toscano wrote: > > > Let me cut right to the chase, do you want to maintain it? Does it need > > > to > > > be in Plasma? > > > > Yes, I can maintain it. In fact many features come from com

Re: remove khelpcenter from next Plasma release?

2016-03-09 Thread Sebastian Kügler
On Wednesday, March 09, 2016 17:30:01 Luigi Toscano wrote: > > Let me cut right to the chase, do you want to maintain it? Does it need to > > be in Plasma? > > Yes, I can maintain it. In fact many features come from components I > already control. > > > You're right that Plasma devs don't seem to

Re: remove khelpcenter from next Plasma release?

2016-03-09 Thread Luigi Toscano
On Wednesday 09 of March 2016 16:16:54 Sebastian Kügler wrote: > On Wednesday, March 09, 2016 17:05:14 Luigi Toscano wrote: > > That said, I perceive this email as "khelpcenter is not welcome in > > Plasma", > > probably with a maintainer ("hell-bent on keeping it" sounds very negative > > to me).

Re: remove khelpcenter from next Plasma release?

2016-03-09 Thread Martin Klapetek
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Martin Gräßlin wrote: > Am 2016-03-09 16:43, schrieb Yuri Chornoivan: > >> >> Hi, >> >> Just of curiosity, what is the next thing, after documentation (as >> Plasma almost does not have it), to get rid from Plasma? Is it >> Okular, Krusader, something else? Just

Re: remove khelpcenter from next Plasma release?

2016-03-09 Thread Marco Martin
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Yuri Chornoivan wrote: > Hi, > > Just of curiosity, what is the next thing, after documentation (as Plasma > almost does not have it), to get rid from Plasma? Is it Okular, Krusader, > something else? Just to make simple, sleek and unintrusive. > > Thanks in advance

Re: remove khelpcenter from next Plasma release?

2016-03-09 Thread Martin Gräßlin
Am 2016-03-09 16:43, schrieb Yuri Chornoivan: написане Wed, 09 Mar 2016 17:29:28 +0200, Sebastian Kügler : Hi all, [For the sake of sanity, please reply to both list, this topic affects applications and Plasma.] One of the topics we are discussing at the current Plasma sprint is whether we

Re: remove khelpcenter from next Plasma release?

2016-03-09 Thread Sebastian Kügler
On Wednesday, March 09, 2016 17:43:37 Yuri Chornoivan wrote: > Just of curiosity, what is the next thing, after documentation (as Plasma > almost does not have it), to get rid from Plasma? Is it Okular, Krusader, > something else? Just to make simple, sleek and unintrusive. > > Thanks in advance fo

Re: remove khelpcenter from next Plasma release?

2016-03-09 Thread Sebastian Kügler
On Wednesday, March 09, 2016 17:05:14 Luigi Toscano wrote: > That said, I perceive this email as "khelpcenter is not welcome in Plasma", > probably with a maintainer ("hell-bent on keeping it" sounds very negative > to me). So not sure what should be the discussion about. The discussion is about r

Re: remove khelpcenter from next Plasma release?

2016-03-09 Thread Marco Martin
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 5:05 PM, Luigi Toscano wrote: > > There is a non-committed work to have search working again, which will cut the > bug list. You should have probably already noticed a bunch of commits which > fixes some language related issues. thanks for stepping up in the maintainership

Re: remove khelpcenter from next Plasma release?

2016-03-09 Thread Luigi Toscano
On Wednesday 09 of March 2016 15:29:28 Sebastian Kügler wrote: > Hi all, > > [For the sake of sanity, please reply to both list, this topic affects > applications and Plasma.] > > One of the topics we are discussing at the current Plasma sprint is whether > we really want khelpcenter as part of t

remove khelpcenter from next Plasma release?

2016-03-09 Thread Sebastian Kügler
Hi all, [For the sake of sanity, please reply to both list, this topic affects applications and Plasma.] One of the topics we are discussing at the current Plasma sprint is whether we really want khelpcenter as part of the Plasma releases in the future. Some data points: - khelpcenter is unmaint

Re: Qt5 version of qimageblitz

2016-03-09 Thread Christoph Feck
On Wednesday 09 March 2016 08:08:14 Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > On Wed, 9 Mar 2016, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > I guess for that we need to decide if it should be a framework > > first or not. > > Isn't kolourpaint the only user of qimageblitz at the moment? Krita > used to use it, years and years a