Re: Policy regarding QtWebKit and QtScript

2015-12-25 Thread Nicolás Alvarez
> On Dec 25, 2015, at 10:28, Thomas Lübking wrote: > >> On Freitag, 25. Dezember 2015 12:42:26 CEST, Milian Wolff wrote: >> >> Sorry, but how is "it takes long to compile" and argument for or against a >> piece of software if there is no feature equivalent alternative that takes >> less time

Re: Policy regarding QtWebKit and QtScript

2015-12-25 Thread Thomas Lübking
On Freitag, 25. Dezember 2015 12:42:26 CEST, Milian Wolff wrote: Sorry, but how is "it takes long to compile" and argument for or against a piece of software if there is no feature equivalent alternative that takes less time to compile? How demanding is it exactly? Considering Gentoo users, i

Re: Policy regarding QtWebKit and QtScript

2015-12-25 Thread Allan Sandfeld Jensen
On Friday 25 December 2015, Adriaan de Groot wrote: > On Friday 25 December 2015 12:42:26 you wrote: > > On Donnerstag, 24. Dezember 2015 12:14:06 CET Adriaan de Groot wrote: > > > On Tuesday 22 December 2015 16:07:06 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez > > > Meyer > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > The idea

Re: Policy regarding QtWebKit and QtScript

2015-12-25 Thread Adriaan de Groot
On Friday 25 December 2015 12:42:26 you wrote: > On Donnerstag, 24. Dezember 2015 12:14:06 CET Adriaan de Groot wrote: > > On Tuesday 22 December 2015 16:07:06 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer > > > > wrote: > > > > The idea that users may have remainders of QtWebKit 5.5 on their disk > > > > (

Re: Policy regarding QtWebKit and QtScript

2015-12-25 Thread Milian Wolff
On Donnerstag, 24. Dezember 2015 12:14:06 CET Adriaan de Groot wrote: > On Tuesday 22 December 2015 16:07:06 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer > > wrote: > > > The idea that users may have remainders of QtWebKit 5.5 on their disk > > > (or > > > not and thus unresolvable linkage) and install Qt