Re: Review Request 126308: KPushButton: respect SH_DialogButtonBox_ButtonsHaveIcons, also when drawing

2015-12-10 Thread Thomas Lübking
> On Dec. 10, 2015, 10:11 p.m., Thomas Lübking wrote: > > 1. What tells you that this is a dialog buttonbox pushbutton? > > 2. What happens if the button has no text? > > > > > > The bug is in QDialogButtonBox (or rather the K variant, > > QDialogButtonBoxPrivate::createButton() seems to incor

Re: Review Request 126308: KPushButton: respect SH_DialogButtonBox_ButtonsHaveIcons, also when drawing

2015-12-10 Thread René J . V . Bertin
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126308/ --- (Updated Dec. 10, 2015, 11:54 p.m.) Review request for KDE Software on Ma

Re: Review Request 126308: KPushButton: respect SH_DialogButtonBox_ButtonsHaveIcons, also when drawing

2015-12-10 Thread René J . V . Bertin
> On Dec. 10, 2015, 11:11 p.m., Thomas Lübking wrote: > > 1. What tells you that this is a dialog buttonbox pushbutton? > > 2. What happens if the button has no text? > > > > > > The bug is in QDialogButtonBox (or rather the K variant, > > QDialogButtonBoxPrivate::createButton() seems to incor

Re: Review Request 126308: KPushButton: respect SH_DialogButtonBox_ButtonsHaveIcons, also when drawing

2015-12-10 Thread Thomas Lübking
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126308/#review89321 --- 1. What tells you that this is a dialog buttonbox pushbutton?

Review Request 126308: KPushButton: respect SH_DialogButtonBox_ButtonsHaveIcons, also when drawing

2015-12-10 Thread René J . V . Bertin
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126308/ --- Review request for KDE Software on Mac OS X, KDE Frameworks and Qt KDE. R

kdesvn moved to kdereview

2015-12-10 Thread Christian Ehrlicher
Hi, after quite some time with no activity in kdesvn, we finally managed to get kdesvn in a shape to move it to extragear. The next steps would be: - create a 1.7.0 release (some help on what's needed to be done for this would be nice) - fix bugs - port to Qt5/KF5 - cleanup svnqt (esp. non th

Re: Change to Mail Infrastructure - SPF and DKIM verification will now be enforced

2015-12-10 Thread Thomas Friedrichsmeier
Hi, On Wed, 09 Dec 2015 11:51:43 +0100 Jan Kundrát wrote: [...] > There is active work within the DMARC WG, with first drafts being > published only *two months ago* [1]. My suggestion for everybody who > doesn't have time to follow this process is to sit back, relax, and > watch the IETF come up

Re: Remove legacy session management support?

2015-12-10 Thread Thomas Lübking
On Donnerstag, 26. November 2015 23:20:24 CEST, Andreas Hartmetz wrote: So, does anybody know of any relevant application that supports only legacy session management? The scheme seems to be called WM_COMMAND / WM_SAVE_YOURSELF for lack of a better name. Google suggests Tcl/Tk might still be

Review Request 126304: (re)enable building with -DQTC_QT5_ENABLE_KDE

2015-12-10 Thread René J . V . Bertin
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126304/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks, Qt KDE and Yichao Yu. Repository: qtcu

Re: Change to Mail Infrastructure - SPF and DKIM verification will now be enforced

2015-12-10 Thread Valorie Zimmerman
I just submitted a request to Ubuntu to upgrade their list infra. I showed Ben a sample email header and they were not compliant. I included a link to Ben's explanatory post: http://marc.info/?l=kde-core-devel&m=144956641505429&w=1 It took less than five minutes to file the ticket. All the best,