On Thu, 10 Dec 2015, Boudhayan Gupta wrote:
On 10 December 2015 at 12:04, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
I'm right now using msvc 2015 myself -- which gives other problems with
other
dependencies.
Microsoft now has clang (running on the Microsoft Code Generator as
well as LLVM) - maybe we could look
On 10 December 2015 at 12:04, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> I'm right now using msvc 2015 myself -- which gives other problems with
> other
> dependencies.
Microsoft now has clang (running on the Microsoft Code Generator as
well as LLVM) - maybe we could look into using that on Windows? It's
supposed
On Mon, 7 Dec 2015, Thomas Lübking wrote:
On Montag, 7. Dezember 2015 17:22:47 CEST, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
There are two sides, of course: if making it easier for a distribution
to package KDE software makes it harder for an application to be packaged
for another distribution, where do we go?
On Sun, December 6, 2015 16:08:04 Antonio Rojas wrote:
> Hi,
> Kipi-plugins fails to build with flex 2.6. This is due to the autogenerated
> code in libpanorama containing //-style comments, which are disallowed in
> C90. Adding -std=c99 to the CFLAGS at compile time doesn't have any effect,
> sin
Hi all,
I'm going recount a personal experience here. I have my own domain
(BaloneyGeek.com) and I use Google Apps for Business for my E-Mail.
A couple of months ago I shifted DNS providers and took the
opportunity to properly set up E-Mail verification and signing. Using
Google's documentation,
I've taken the liberty to remove the ad-hominem which you used. I'm not
happy with your approach to this discussion, but I'll try to stick with the
technical points.
There is active work within the DMARC WG, with first drafts being published
only *two months ago* [1]. My suggestion for everybo
On Wednesday, December 9, 2015 2:09:01 AM CET Valorie Zimmerman wrote:
> We *can* do this, we need to do this, and Ben doesn't have time to do
> all the work himself. So we need to do our part to help.
That's what I suggested in one of my mails. We need to tackle this as a
coordinated project whe
Can we please lower the temperature on this discussion a bit?
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 1:54 AM, Ben Cooksley wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 4:37 AM, Jan Kundrát wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 8 December 2015 16:09:43 CET, Nicolás Alvarez wrote:
>>>
>>> It is irrelevant what our personal preference about d
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 4:37 AM, Jan Kundrát wrote:
> On Tuesday, 8 December 2015 16:09:43 CET, Nicolás Alvarez wrote:
>>
>> It is irrelevant what our personal preference about doing modifications to
>> messages is (like the tag in the subject). The fact of life is that there
>> *are* mail provider
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 5:00 AM, Jan Kundrát wrote:
> On Friday, 4 December 2015 10:56:42 CET, Ben Cooksley wrote:
>>
>> To be specific I will be enabling the following line:
>>
>> On-BadSignature tempfail
>>
>> within the configuration of OpenDKIM on our servers.
>
>
> Thanks, but that's n
10 matches
Mail list logo
