Re: Move ktp-call-ui to kdenetwork

2015-12-08 Thread Diane Trout
Hello, ktp-call-ui is the component of KDE-Telepathy that provides support for Audio/Video calls. It was previously part of the regular release in KDE4, though it wasn't well maintained due to the previous maintainer losing interest. Eventually with the switch to KF5 ktp-call-ui was dropped. I

Re: Move ktp-call-ui to kdenetwork

2015-12-08 Thread Urs Wolfer
Since this application in extragear already, it can be considered as "stable" [1]. I have never used it so far, so I cannot really decide if it's worth adding it to the KDE main modules but I also have no real objections for moving it. Bye urs [1] https://techbase.kde.org/Policies/Applicat

Jenkins-kde-ci: kdelibs KDE-4.14 latest-qt4 » Linux,gcc - Build # 45 - Still Unstable!

2015-12-08 Thread no-reply
GENERAL INFO BUILD UNSTABLE Build URL: https://build.kde.org/job/kdelibs%20KDE-4.14%20latest-qt4/PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=gcc/45/ Project: PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=gcc Date of build: Tue, 08 Dec 2015 15:50:02 + Build duration: 11 min CHANGE SET Revision 20238568bc97a1c1def220a811c8a7d0ea7d029

Jenkins-kde-ci: kdelibs KDE-4.14 stable-qt4 » Linux,gcc - Build # 42 - Still Unstable!

2015-12-08 Thread no-reply
GENERAL INFO BUILD UNSTABLE Build URL: https://build.kde.org/job/kdelibs%20KDE-4.14%20stable-qt4/PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=gcc/42/ Project: PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=gcc Date of build: Tue, 08 Dec 2015 15:50:02 + Build duration: 11 min CHANGE SET Revision 20238568bc97a1c1def220a811c8a7d0ea7d029

Re: Change to Mail Infrastructure - SPF and DKIM verification will now be enforced

2015-12-08 Thread Jan Kundrát
On Friday, 4 December 2015 10:56:42 CET, Ben Cooksley wrote: To be specific I will be enabling the following line: On-BadSignature tempfail within the configuration of OpenDKIM on our servers. Thanks, but that's not a full answer. What is the proposed content of the following DNS rec

Re: Change to Mail Infrastructure - SPF and DKIM verification will now be enforced

2015-12-08 Thread Jan Kundrát
On Tuesday, 8 December 2015 16:09:43 CET, Nicolás Alvarez wrote: It is irrelevant what our personal preference about doing modifications to messages is (like the tag in the subject). The fact of life is that there *are* mail providers out there (like Yahoo) which are already enforcing DMARC and

Re: Change to Mail Infrastructure - SPF and DKIM verification will now be enforced

2015-12-08 Thread Nicolás Alvarez
> El 8 dic 2015, a las 07:11, Jan Kundrát escribió: > > It is irrelevant what our personal preference is. The fact of life is that > there *are* mailing lists out there which perform these modifications, and > these MLs won't change their config despite changes on our side. If we start > reje

Re: Change to Mail Infrastructure - SPF and DKIM verification will now be enforced

2015-12-08 Thread Sven Brauch
On 08/12/15 10:54, Ben Cooksley wrote: >> > Correction: Wayland is also affected. I didn't check a gmail mail. So given >> > that all freedesktop.org are probably affected. >> > >> > Sorry Ben, that's just a no, it will be highly disruptive to KDE to turn us >> > off from these mailing lists. > Can

Re: Change to Mail Infrastructure - SPF and DKIM verification will now be enforced

2015-12-08 Thread Martin Graesslin
On Tuesday, December 8, 2015 10:54:13 PM CET Ben Cooksley wrote: > On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 10:33 PM, Martin Graesslin wrote: > > On Tuesday, December 8, 2015 9:51:50 AM CET Martin Graesslin wrote: > >> On Tuesday, December 8, 2015 8:21:03 PM CET Ben Cooksley wrote: > >> > On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 2:

Re: Change to Mail Infrastructure - SPF and DKIM verification will now be enforced

2015-12-08 Thread Thomas Lübking
> It is irrelevant what our personal preference is. The fact of life is that there *are* mailing lists out there which perform these modifications, and these MLs won't change their config despite changes on our side. If we start rejecting these e-mails, well, our addresses will be unsubscribed from

Re: Change to Mail Infrastructure - SPF and DKIM verification will now be enforced

2015-12-08 Thread Ben Cooksley
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 11:11 PM, Jan Kundrát wrote: > On Tuesday, 8 December 2015 10:19:51 CET, Ben Cooksley wrote: >> >> a) Clearing the "subject_prefix" setting >> b) Clearing "msg_header" and "msg_footer" >> c) Disabling "scrub_nondigest" and "first_strip_reply_to" >> >> Depending on who posts

Re: Change to Mail Infrastructure - SPF and DKIM verification will now be enforced

2015-12-08 Thread Jan Kundrát
On Tuesday, 8 December 2015 10:19:51 CET, Ben Cooksley wrote: a) Clearing the "subject_prefix" setting b) Clearing "msg_header" and "msg_footer" c) Disabling "scrub_nondigest" and "first_strip_reply_to" Depending on who posts to your list, you may also need to: a) Set "reply_goes_to_list" to "Po

Re: Change to Mail Infrastructure - SPF and DKIM verification will now be enforced

2015-12-08 Thread Ben Cooksley
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 10:33 PM, Martin Graesslin wrote: > On Tuesday, December 8, 2015 9:51:50 AM CET Martin Graesslin wrote: >> On Tuesday, December 8, 2015 8:21:03 PM CET Ben Cooksley wrote: >> > On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Martin Graesslin > wrote: >> > > On Friday, December 4, 2015 11:28

Re: Change to Mail Infrastructure - SPF and DKIM verification will now be enforced

2015-12-08 Thread Martin Graesslin
On Tuesday, December 8, 2015 9:51:50 AM CET Martin Graesslin wrote: > On Tuesday, December 8, 2015 8:21:03 PM CET Ben Cooksley wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Martin Graesslin wrote: > > > On Friday, December 4, 2015 11:28:03 AM CET Jan Kundrát wrote: > > >> On Friday, 4 December 2015

Re: Change to Mail Infrastructure - SPF and DKIM verification will now be enforced

2015-12-08 Thread Ben Cooksley
Hi all, The following is a guide which explains the problem, and how to correct it. SPF is a mail protocol designed to ensure a given mail server is in fact permitted to send email for a domain. It protects the return path component of an email, and helps protect against back scatter attacks, and

Re: Change to Mail Infrastructure - SPF and DKIM verification will now be enforced

2015-12-08 Thread Martin Graesslin
On Tuesday, December 8, 2015 8:21:03 PM CET Ben Cooksley wrote: > On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Martin Graesslin wrote: > > On Friday, December 4, 2015 11:28:03 AM CET Jan Kundrát wrote: > >> On Friday, 4 December 2015 10:56:42 CET, Ben Cooksley wrote: > >> > Note that in the long run with DMARC