Re: Change to Mail Infrastructure - SPF and DKIM verification will now be enforced

2015-12-07 Thread Ben Cooksley
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Martin Graesslin wrote: > On Friday, December 4, 2015 11:28:03 AM CET Jan Kundrát wrote: >> On Friday, 4 December 2015 10:56:42 CET, Ben Cooksley wrote: >> > Note that in the long run with DMARC looming you will need to switch >> > to #2 anyway, and keeping your cur

Re: Why is C90 enforced in KDE?

2015-12-07 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Monday 07 December 2015 21:36:13 Thomas Lübking wrote: > You also may have some (personal, at least) data on relevant MSVC 2013 is in > practice? Because every gcc in the wild as well as clang should be able to > handle C99 - and so should MSVC 2015 and the intel compiler(s of the past). > Afaic

Re: Why is C90 enforced in KDE?

2015-12-07 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Monday 07 December 2015 09:29:59 Thomas Lübking wrote: > Either way, Qt5 supports down to MSVC 2010, Qt4 down to MSVC 2008, so either > we Qt 5.6 supports MSVC 2008. Qt 5.7 raises the minimum to MSVC 2012. Neither compiler supports stdint.h or some other nice C99 functions, like isnanf. You n

Re: Move ktp-call-ui to kdenetwork

2015-12-07 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Wednesday 02 December 2015, a les 20:30:11, Diane Trout va escriure: > Hello, > > Thanks to contributions from several people we have a build of ktp-call-ui > that works with KF5 libraries. I've done some testing calling a few test > call services using SIP. > > ktp-call-ui commit 1e1ff29f5586

Re: Why is C90 enforced in KDE?

2015-12-07 Thread Patrick Spendrin
Am 07.12.2015 um 21:36 schrieb Thomas Lübking: > On Montag, 7. Dezember 2015 17:22:47 CEST, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > >> There are two sides, of course: if making it easier for a distribution >> to package KDE software makes it harder for an application to be packaged >> for another distribution, w

Re: Why is C90 enforced in KDE?

2015-12-07 Thread Thomas Lübking
On Montag, 7. Dezember 2015 17:22:47 CEST, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: There are two sides, of course: if making it easier for a distribution to package KDE software makes it harder for an application to be packaged for another distribution, where do we go? What's most important? Just adding a depend

Re: Why is C90 enforced in KDE?

2015-12-07 Thread Boudewijn Rempt
On Mon, 7 Dec 2015, Luca Beltrame wrote: Il Mon, 07 Dec 2015 13:17:53 +0100, Boudewijn Rempt ha scritto: Unfortunately, Linux distros aren't the main platform anymore for the KDE software _I_ maintain. Given you've said this multiple times, Yes, and I'll go on saying it until I feel people

Re: Why is C90 enforced in KDE?

2015-12-07 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Monday, December 07, 2015 04:33:37 PM Thomas Lübking wrote: > On Montag, 7. Dezember 2015 15:54:40 CEST, Luca Beltrame wrote: > > Given you've said this multiple times, with my packager hat on I'll just > > mention this: just don't make it harder *for us* to work just because > > you're targetin

Re: Why is C90 enforced in KDE?

2015-12-07 Thread Thomas Lübking
On Montag, 7. Dezember 2015 15:54:40 CEST, Luca Beltrame wrote: Given you've said this multiple times, with my packager hat on I'll just mention this: just don't make it harder *for us* to work just because you're targeting another platform. I actually don't think this related at all. Compil

Re: Why is C90 enforced in KDE?

2015-12-07 Thread Luca Beltrame
Il Mon, 07 Dec 2015 13:17:53 +0100, Boudewijn Rempt ha scritto: > Unfortunately, Linux distros aren't the main platform anymore for the > KDE software _I_ maintain. Given you've said this multiple times, with my packager hat on I'll just mention this: just don't make it harder *for us* to work j

Re: Change to Mail Infrastructure - SPF and DKIM verification will now be enforced

2015-12-07 Thread Martin Graesslin
On Friday, December 4, 2015 11:28:03 AM CET Jan Kundrát wrote: > On Friday, 4 December 2015 10:56:42 CET, Ben Cooksley wrote: > > Note that in the long run with DMARC looming you will need to switch > > to #2 anyway, and keeping your current behaviour will likely lead to > > mail from people who us

Re: Change to Mail Infrastructure - SPF and DKIM verification will now be enforced

2015-12-07 Thread Sebastian Kügler
On Friday, December 04, 2015 11:28:03 AM Jan Kundrát wrote: > On Friday, 4 December 2015 10:56:42 CET, Ben Cooksley wrote: > > Note that in the long run with DMARC looming you will need to switch > > to #2 anyway, and keeping your current behaviour will likely lead to > > mail from people who use Y

Re: Why is C90 enforced in KDE?

2015-12-07 Thread Boudewijn Rempt
On Mon, 7 Dec 2015, Kevin Kofler wrote: +1, of course we should not. Generated files have no business being in a source control or in source tarballs. "BuildRequires: flex" is one line in a distro specfile. Unfortunately, Linux distros aren't the main platform anymore for the KDE software _I_

Re: Generated files in version control (was: Re: Why is C90 enforced in KDE?)

2015-12-07 Thread Thomas Lübking
On Montag, 7. Dezember 2015 01:08:31 CEST, Nicolás Alvarez wrote: It will look better to stick my app logo into the real-artist-designed piece-of-paper-with-shadow than to draw an icon from scratch... Afaiu, one should have asked the oxygen team to avoid this kind of patched icons. I don't

Re: Why is C90 enforced in KDE?

2015-12-07 Thread Thomas Lübking
On Montag, 7. Dezember 2015 03:14:05 CEST, Kevin Kofler wrote: not surprised that they are now using C99 comments (which ARE compliant to the current C standard, and have been for 16 years (!)). Sure, but since it seems it's the only C99 feature used(?, stdint is more a library thing, at least