On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 12:12 PM, Christoph Cullmann wrote:
>> Personally I prefer having the application versions matching the release
>> version
>> (ie. 15.04.x) so that there is no additional versions mapping required ("is
>> version 3.4
>> part of KDE Applications 15.04 or 15.08 or..?").
>>
>>
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 11:35 AM, David Jarvie wrote:
>
> >
> > There has been debate about this for frameworks, and there is an argument
> > there (not agreed by everybody) for making all frameworks have the same
> > version, since framework libraries are dependencies for other software.
> >
>
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 11:35 AM, David Jarvie wrote:
>
> There has been debate about this for frameworks, and there is an argument
> there (not agreed by everybody) for making all frameworks have the same
> version, since framework libraries are dependencies for other software.
>
> The same argum
On Mon, June 8, 2015 11:32 pm, Aleix Pol wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 8:25 PM, Christoph Cullmann
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> for frameworks, it is all very nice and automatic, the version in the
>> CMakeLists.txt get auto-updated on each KF 5.x release.
>>
>> It seems to me, for the "applications" c
