These are from the kf5-qt5 branchGroup (usually master or frameworks
branches) I realize many these are still under heavy development for
porting. This is just a note to inform. Fixes welcome though.
kcalcore:
https://build-sandbox.kde.org/job/kcalcore%20master%20kf5-qt5/PLATFORM=Linux,compiler=
On Wednesday 22 April 2015, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> > On April 22, 2015, 12:40 a.m., Luigi Toscano wrote:
> > > I think this should go to Qt (I think it's quite difficult they will
> > > accept it, as Qt4 is in hard freeze mode), and they will probably ask
> > > to see if it applies to Qt5 as wel
> On April 20, 2015, 10:36 p.m., Thomas Pfeiffer wrote:
> > What would likely be confusing is that the two button modes have different
> > interaction flows: The "End Process" mode requires to first select a
> > process and then press the button to work, whereas the "Kill specific
> > window"
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
>> Fair enough. One of them starts in [0], but there was another thread in
>> which even Lars participated. So far I haven't been able to find it, I'll
>> keep trying.
>>
> Found the other one!
FYI, if you provide a gmane link, you provide the whole thr
Hi,
we're now running with Gerrit 2.11. This brings a couple of new features
and changes.
My personal favorite is the online editing via web browser. One can now fix
up small changes in patches without going to git. It's also possible to
create new changes from scratch, without touching Git a
On Tuesday 21 April 2015 09:44:41 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 April 2015 09:39:35 Milian Wolff wrote:
> [snip]
>
> > > Yes we have, but on the main devel mailing list,
> > > developm...@qt-project.org
> > > It has been troughly discussed, the thread is actually very
On Tuesday 21 April 2015 09:39:35 Milian Wolff wrote:
[snip]
> > Yes we have, but on the main devel mailing list,
> > developm...@qt-project.org
> > It has been troughly discussed, the thread is actually very long.
>
> When did this take place and what is the threads subject? I seem to have
> mis
