Yeah, obviously to share with all users installing data files into
/Library/Application Support/ is better, I just didn't do that in my test
since my user doesn't own that folder and I didn't want to install with
sudo for a test.
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 7:26 PM, Aleix Pol wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 26
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 10:45 AM, René J.V. wrote:
> On Wednesday February 25 2015 19:10:08 Jeremy Whiting wrote:
>
>>QStandardPaths there that worked pretty well. In discussion with the Qt
>>developers I began to think that we maybe should be installing our data
>>files in the places that QStanda
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122249/
---
(Updated Feb. 27, 2015, 1:18 a.m.)
Review request for KDE Base Apps, Mart
El Dijous, 26 de febrer de 2015, a les 16:55:17, Martin Klapetek va escriure:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 6:39 PM, Martin Klapetek <
> >
> > martin.klape...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> As I said it's not even being used right now, so imho would b
El Dijous, 26 de febrer de 2015, a les 08:56:26, David Faure va escriure:
> On Thursday 26 February 2015 01:02:04 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > Really it has to be either part of KIO or another framework, i mean, if
> > you're using the desktop only (and no apps) you're also going to need it.
>
>
On Wednesday February 25 2015 19:10:08 Jeremy Whiting wrote:
>QStandardPaths there that worked pretty well. In discussion with the Qt
>developers I began to think that we maybe should be installing our data
>files in the places that QStandardPaths expect to find them, rather than
>get QStandardPat
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 6:39 PM, Martin Klapetek <
> martin.klape...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> As I said it's not even being used right now, so imho would be fine if it
>> got
>> removed/disabled altogether.
>>
>
> Also, it will never work. B
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 6:39 PM, Martin Klapetek
wrote:
> As I said it's not even being used right now, so imho would be fine if it
> got
> removed/disabled altogether.
>
Also, it will never work. Baloo KF5, has no knowledge about emails. That
code also uses Akonadi APIs.
--
Vishesh Handa
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 3:10 AM, Jeremy Whiting wrote:
> Hello core developers,
>
> In the past few months some effort has been made to get the frameworks (kf5)
> to work on other platforms such as OS X and Windows. Together with Marko I
> focused primarily on OS X since there was already a patch
