> On Feb. 13, 2015, 11:39 p.m., Marko Käning wrote:
> > I'd vote for keeping it compatible to Qt 5.3, if that's possible.
+1. Depending on 5.4 in applications already is bad enough even though it can
sometimes be necessary but I am against it for our base stuff. Especially in
this case where t
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122556/#review76012
---
I'd vote for keeping it compatible to Qt 5.3, if that's possib
> On Feb. 13, 2015, 8:41 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > AFAIK our CI system doesn't support Qt 5.4 yet. I think we should first
> > ensure the CI system is prepared for building with the new dependency.
>
> Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> It does
> http://build.kde.org/job/kde-baseapps_mast
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122563/
---
(Updated Feb. 13, 2015, 8:47 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been ma
I did some tests.
the correct url is http://localhost:3000/bodega/v1/json/route even tough
no routes seems to match
I can't figure out why, the only thing seems to be the express module to be
broken in some way.
probably good to make some tests with simple exampl-ish express apps
On Fri, Feb 13
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122563/#review76003
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Jeremy Whiting
On Feb. 13, 2015, 12:19
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122563/
---
Review request for KDE Software on Mac OS X and kdelibs.
Repository: kdel
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Aleix Pol wrote:
> Hi,
> I would like to submit KPeople for review process so it can join the
> KF5 family in the next 5.8 release.
>
> KPeople is a tier 3 framework (because of KService, which will be
> dropped eventually, without breaking ABI) and it offers cross
Am Mittwoch, 11. Februar 2015, 16:30:39 schrieb Andreas Hartmetz:
> On Wednesday 11 February 2015 14:59:50 Adriaan de Groot wrote:
> > On Monday 09 February 2015 01:50:03 Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
> > > Yes, nearly copy&paste: the copies of KDChart in Calligra & KMyMoney
> > > are older (2.4
Hi,
I would like to submit KPeople for review process so it can join the
KF5 family in the next 5.8 release.
KPeople is a tier 3 framework (because of KService, which will be
dropped eventually, without breaking ABI) and it offers cross-source
contact aggregation. More information about it can be
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122552/
---
(Updated Feb. 13, 2015, 1:17 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been ma
> On Feb. 13, 2015, 9:41 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > AFAIK our CI system doesn't support Qt 5.4 yet. I think we should first
> > ensure the CI system is prepared for building with the new dependency.
>
> Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> It does
> http://build.kde.org/job/kde-baseapps_mast
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122552/#review75975
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Marco Martin
On Feb. 13, 2015, 1:49 a.
> On Feb. 13, 2015, 8:41 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > AFAIK our CI system doesn't support Qt 5.4 yet. I think we should first
> > ensure the CI system is prepared for building with the new dependency.
>
> Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> It does
> http://build.kde.org/job/kde-baseapps_mast
> On feb. 13, 2015, 8:41 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > AFAIK our CI system doesn't support Qt 5.4 yet. I think we should first
> > ensure the CI system is prepared for building with the new dependency.
It does
http://build.kde.org/job/kde-baseapps_master_qt5/238/consoleFull
qt5 - Branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122556/#review75971
---
AFAIK our CI system doesn't support Qt 5.4 yet. I think we sho
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122556/
---
Review request for KDE Base Apps.
Repository: kde-baseapps
Description
17 matches
Mail list logo
