Re: Review Request 122249: libksysguard: add Kill Window to End Process button and show correct keyboard shortcut

> On Jan. 26, 2015, 8:05 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > My opinion is that this is a feature which should not be exposed in > > libksysguard. It actually ties libksysguard to KWin, while libksysguard was > > in the past also used in e.g. kdevelop. > > > > If libksysguard wants to offer the fu

Re: Placement of config files for Plasma 5 and KF5-based applications

On Tuesday 27 January 2015 01:01:27 Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: > Hi everyone, > first of all, I think it's a great step in the right direction that we're > now putting our config files in ~/.config instead of ~/.kde(4), we're now > finally "standard-compliant". > > However, where we still could - and

Placement of config files for Plasma 5 and KF5-based applications

Hi everyone, first of all, I think it's a great step in the right direction that we're now putting our config files in ~/.config instead of ~/.kde(4), we're now finally "standard-compliant". However, where we still could - and imho should - do better is with where exactly we put them. If I look

Re: Review Request 122270: port kcminit away from kdelibs4support

> On Jan. 27, 2015, 6:59 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > startkde/kcminit/main.cpp, lines 250-254 > > > > > > I do not like this. If the only need is to check whether it's X11 > > multi-head, it should open an x

Re: Review Request 122270: port kcminit away from kdelibs4support

> On Jan. 27, 2015, 6:59 vorm., Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > startkde/kcminit/main.cpp, lines 250-254 > > > > > > I do not like this. If the only need is to check whether it's X11 > > multi-head, it should open an

Re: Review Request 122270: port kcminit away from kdelibs4support

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122270/ --- (Updated Jan. 28, 2015, 12:47 a.m.) Review request for kde-workspace, Ale

Re: [kcalc][kcharselect][kcron] Merged frameworks branch to master, now KF5 based

Christoph Feck ha scritto: > Hi, > > I just merged the "frameworks" KF5 porting branches of the following > applications to "master" branch: > > - kcalc > - kcharselect > - kcron > > These applications will be released as KF5 applications for the KDE > Applications 15.03 release. > > Please c

Re: [kcalc][kcharselect][kcron] Merged frameworks branch to master, now KF5 based

El Dimecres, 28 de gener de 2015, a les 00:12:26, Christoph Feck va escriure: > Hi, > > I just merged the "frameworks" KF5 porting branches of the following > applications to "master" branch: > > - kcalc > - kcharselect > - kcron > > These applications will be released as KF5 applications for th

[kcalc][kcharselect][kcron] Merged frameworks branch to master, now KF5 based

Hi, I just merged the "frameworks" KF5 porting branches of the following applications to "master" branch: - kcalc - kcharselect - kcron These applications will be released as KF5 applications for the KDE Applications 15.03 release. Please check if everything went smooth, and report issues/reg

Re: Review Request 122249: libksysguard: add Kill Window to End Process button and show correct keyboard shortcut

> On Jan. 26, 2015, 7:05 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > My opinion is that this is a feature which should not be exposed in > > libksysguard. It actually ties libksysguard to KWin, while libksysguard was > > in the past also used in e.g. kdevelop. > > > > If libksysguard wants to offer the fu

Re: Review Request 122270: port kcminit away from kdelibs4support

> On Січ. 27, 2015, 6:59 до полудня, Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > startkde/kcminit/main.cpp, lines 250-254 > > > > > > I do not like this. If the only need is to check whether it's X11 > > multi-head, it should ope

Review Request 122276: [OS X] use a more accurate Display stub typedef

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122276/ --- Review request for KDE Software on Mac OS X and kdelibs. Repository: kdel

Re: Review Request 122249: libksysguard: add Kill Window to End Process button and show correct keyboard shortcut

> On Jan. 26, 2015, 7:05 vorm., Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > My opinion is that this is a feature which should not be exposed in > > libksysguard. It actually ties libksysguard to KWin, while libksysguard was > > in the past also used in e.g. kdevelop. > > > > If libksysguard wants to offer the f

Re: Review Request 122267: ki18n: Make it build with msvc compilers again

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122267/ --- (Updated Jan. 27, 2015, 2:15 p.m.) Status -- This change has been ma

Re: Sysadmin report on the modernization of our infrastructure

Hi, On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 03:30:48 +0100 Thomas Lübking wrote: > On Samstag, 24. Januar 2015 15:24:28 CET, Thomas Friedrichsmeier > wrote: > > > But beyond review functionality, I think moving towards a more > > integrated solution is clearly a step in the right direction, and > > this is what mak

Re: Sysadmin report on the modernization of our infrastructure

On Tuesday, January 27, 2015 03:30:48 Thomas Lübking wrote: > On Samstag, 24. Januar 2015 15:24:28 CET, Thomas Friedrichsmeier wrote: > > But beyond review functionality, I think moving towards a more > > integrated solution is clearly a step in the right direction, and this > > is what makes the c

Re: Sysadmin report on the modernization of our infrastructure

On Tuesday, 27 January 2015 09:51:46 CEST, Ben Cooksley wrote: Jenkins provides rich tracking of tests, code coverage and code quality (eg: cppcheck) in addition to checking if it builds. Zuul is designed to determine if it builds and if tests fail - providing a binary pass/fail response. This

Re: Sysadmin report on the modernization of our infrastructure

Hi all, Based on the feedback we'll now begin putting together a test instance so Phabricator can be seriously evaluated by the community. I've noted that the following projects have expressed interest in using it: - Calligra/Krita. - Zanshin. - KActivities. - Konversation. If any other projects

Re: Sysadmin report on the modernization of our infrastructure

On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Thomas Lübking wrote: > On Samstag, 24. Januar 2015 15:24:28 CET, Thomas Friedrichsmeier wrote: > >> But beyond review functionality, I think moving towards a more >> integrated solution is clearly a step in the right direction, and this >> is what makes the choice