On Saturday, 3 January 2015 08:57:43 CEST, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
It would be nice if there was an opt-out for this. I receive a
large number of
emails from gerrit for reviews which I have been automatically
subscribed to
which I have absolutely zero interest in.
Hi Aaron,
sorry about that. D
On Saturday, 3 January 2015 21:35:12 CEST, Jeff Mitchell wrote:
On 3 Jan 2015, at 14:00, Jan Kundrát wrote:
- Working on git trees, not patches. This directly translates
into making the contributors familiar with our workflow, and
therefore getting them "immersed" into what we're doing and
hel
El Dissabte, 3 de gener de 2015, a les 15:31:26, Ben Cooksley va escriure:
> Hi all,
>
> I've gone over the comments everyone has made thus far and came up
> with the following community wishlist as it were.
> It represents a combination of what everyone has said, in a fairly
> distilled form.
>
On 3 Jan 2015, at 14:00, Jan Kundrát wrote:
- Working on git trees, not patches. This directly translates into
making the contributors familiar with our workflow, and therefore
getting them "immersed" into what we're doing and helping bridge the
gap between maintainers and contributors.
I agr
> On Jan. 3, 2015, 12:35 p.m., Dominik Haumann wrote:
> > The feature itself is nice, but in its current implementation, the
> > translators won't be able to properly translate the strings into other
> > languages, see detailed comments.
> >
> > Besides that, would be nice to get another revie
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121717/
---
(Updated Jan. 3, 2015, 8:02 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Base Apps and Jo
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120202/
---
(Updated Jan. 3, 2015, 8:41 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Software on Mac
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120202/
---
(Updated Jan. 3, 2015, 8:42 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Software on Mac
On Saturday, 3 January 2015 03:31:26 CEST, Ben Cooksley wrote:
Regrettably there were one or two items which conflicted. I sided with
the option which kept the barrier to entry as low
as possible as that seemed to be the greater consensus within the thread.
Hi Ben,
thanks for compiling a list.
On Saturday 03 January 2015 12:39:42 Lydia Pintscher wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > For Gerrit:
> I think before checking Ben's list against specific implementations we
> should make sure the list is actually correct and complete. It's the
> basis for an impor
On Samstag, 3. Januar 2015 15:09:58 CEST, Tobias Leupold wrote:
IMHO, the real question is, shouldn't that pointless wrapper be deprecated
in favor of just using Marble directly?
Can marble be used in an identical way as libkgeomap
Afaiu and would expect, libkgeomap wraps marble, openstreetma
On January 3, 2015 03:31:26 PM Ben Cooksley wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've gone over the comments everyone has made thus far and came up
> with the following community wishlist as it were.
> It represents a combination of what everyone has said, in a fairly
> distilled form.
>
> Regrettably there were
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121805/
---
Review request for kdelibs and Marko Käning.
Repository: kconfig
Descri
> IMHO, the real question is, shouldn't that pointless wrapper be deprecated
> in favor of just using Marble directly?
Can marble be used in an identical way as libkgeomap, as a QWidget only
displaying a map with not only coordinates but also photo thumbnails (grouping
the coordinates when the z
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121717/#review73001
---
The feature itself is nice, but in its current implementation,
On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> For Gerrit:
I think before checking Ben's list against specific implementations we
should make sure the list is actually correct and complete. It's the
basis for an important decision so let's do this step-by-step? :)
Cheers
Lydia
--
L
For Gerrit:
> - Code Reviews:
> - CLI client to make changes to the code review system and to manage
> the review (including retrieving the commits/patches)
Check. It's ssh host gerrit
> Client should have good documentation.
> - System should automatically set the CC / Reviewers / etc
On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 8:57 PM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Saturday, January 3, 2015 15.31:26 Ben Cooksley wrote:
>> - System should automatically set the CC / Reviewers / etc for a
>> review rather than the submitter needing to know who to set.
>
> It would be nice if there was an opt-out for t
On Saturday, January 3, 2015 15.31:26 Ben Cooksley wrote:
> - System should automatically set the CC / Reviewers / etc for a
> review rather than the submitter needing to know who to set.
It would be nice if there was an opt-out for this. I receive a large number of
emails from gerrit for revie
19 matches
Mail list logo