Hi,
On Tue, 23 Dec 2014 13:21:37 +0100
Milian Wolff wrote:
> Here's a list of things that I'd like to have for my workflow, which
> is basically two folded: On one hand, I actively develop new software
> and new features. On the other hand, I spent a considerable amount of
> KDE time reviewing ot
On Saturday 27 December 2014 12:56:27 Jan Kundrát wrote:
> On Tuesday, 23 December 2014 13:21:37 CEST, Milian Wolff wrote:
> > Furthermore, I'd like to use the same review mechanism for
> > post-review. When a
> > patch is triggering problems, I'd like to start a discussion in
> > the context of
>
On Tuesday, 23 December 2014 13:21:37 CEST, Milian Wolff wrote:
Furthermore, I'd like to use the same review mechanism for
post-review. When a
patch is triggering problems, I'd like to start a discussion in
the context of
the commit that was merged. Again, I want to annotate source
lines. So
Hi, here's my possibly incomplete wishlist of how I would like to work on
SW within KDE.
- The tools should recognize that we have a limited number of people
familiar with the code, while the pool of newcomers tends to be bigger.
This means that we should teach these newcomers on how to eventu
