It's the plan. It'll be released the same day than applications 14.12.1
together with kde-workspace 4.11.lots and kdepim* 4.14.4
Enviat des del meu telèfon intel·ligent BlackBerry 10.
Missatge original
De: Christoph Feck
Enviat: jueves, 18 de diciembre de 2014 01:58
Per a: kde-core-devel@kde
Hi,
The Applications 14.12 release includes kde-runtime, but not kdelibs.
Its 4.14 branch contains at least one import KHTML crash fix, and we
should get those out to users that still use long term supported
Workspaces 4.11.
Could we create tarballs of the kdelibs repo for future Workspaces
4
El Dimecres, 17 de desembre de 2014, a les 23:11:01, Christoph Feck va
escriure:
> frameworks branch can be deleted.
>
> Please rewire CI, translations or whatever else is needed.
Fixed CI, killed the branch.
Cheers,
Albert
>
> Merci :)
>
> Christoph Feck (kdepepo)
Christoph Feck ha scritto:
> frameworks branch can be deleted.
>
> Please rewire CI, translations or whatever else is needed.
(cc for kde-i18n-doc@)
i18n hopefully fixed (please check):
http://websvn.kde.org/?view=revision&revision=1409082
Ciao
--
Luigi
frameworks branch can be deleted.
Please rewire CI, translations or whatever else is needed.
Merci :)
Christoph Feck (kdepepo)
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/121584/
---
Review request for Bodega, kdelibs, Aaron J. Seigo, and Marco Martin.
Rep
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 6:30 AM, Jan Kundrát wrote:
> On Tuesday, 16 December 2014 23:58:02 CEST, Ben Cooksley wrote:
>>
>> If we were to replace Jenkins, you have indicated that custom work
>> would be required to get reports for tests and tools like cppcheck
>> generated and published.
>
>
> Hi
On Tuesday, 16 December 2014 23:58:02 CEST, Ben Cooksley wrote:
If we were to replace Jenkins, you have indicated that custom work
would be required to get reports for tests and tools like cppcheck
generated and published.
Hi Ben, what I said is that generating pretty plots about historical tre
On 17 Dec 2014, at 6:01, Jan Kundrát wrote:
Hi Jeff, thanks for a very reasonable mail, I don't have much to add
to it in general, except for one item:
But it's not reasonable to expect the sysadmins to support multiple
parallel systems
Maybe there is a misunderstanding of some kind -- I do
Hi Jeff, thanks for a very reasonable mail, I don't have much to add to it
in general, except for one item:
But it's not reasonable to expect the sysadmins to support
multiple parallel systems
Maybe there is a misunderstanding of some kind -- I do not expect sysadmins
to take care of a syste
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120761/
---
(Updated Dec. 17, 2014, 10:05 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been m
Hello folks,
I've been reading the very intense discussion about the future of our
infrastructure, and the passion is good to see.
I hope all of the participants will keep in mind that we are thinking
together about the future of KDE, not supporting products or
positions. Already I've heard one p
12 matches
Mail list logo