Yeah, though sadly since it required new symbols I couldn't backport that
change. :-(
Rich.
On 22 October 2014 22:05, Thomas Lübking wrote:
> On Mittwoch, 22. Oktober 2014 22:11:56 CEST, Richard Moore wrote:
>
>> Yes, this is why I implemented https://codereview.qt-project.
>> org/#/c/80470/
>
On Mittwoch, 22. Oktober 2014 22:11:56 CEST, Richard Moore wrote:
Yes, this is why I implemented https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/80470/
Thanks, I guess you can close
https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-42112 then.
Cheers,
Thomas
Yes, this is why I implemented https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/80470/
Rich.
On 21 October 2014 23:20, Thomas Lübking wrote:
> On Dienstag, 21. Oktober 2014 21:24:33 CEST, Dawit A wrote:
>
>> I think this whole problem came about as a result of a misunderstanding?
>> [...]
>> So the proto
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120210/#review68920
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Luigi Toscano
On Sept. 16, 2014, 3:15