Re: Review Request 120376: drKonqi Fix Bug 337742 - Unable to send report: error code 410 from Bugzilla

> On sep. 26, 2014, 11:54 matin, Ian Wadham wrote: > > Hi Frédéric, > > > > As announced on KDE Core devel, in > > http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-core-devel&m=141016488132293&w=2 about 3 weeks > > ago, I also am working on Dr Konqi. > > > > I am about to publish a general patch, which is aimed a

Re: Review Request 120376: drKonqi Fix Bug 337742 - Unable to send report: error code 410 from Bugzilla

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120376/ --- (Updated oct. 8, 2014, 1:49 matin) Review request for KDE Runtime and Ian

Re: Review Request 120431: Fix and future-proof Dr Konqi security methods on Bugzilla

> On Oct. 7, 2014, 1:13 p.m., Thomas Lübking wrote: > > My 2¢ > > Bugzilla will require an update anyway and that means at some point it'll > > be (then "silently") broken in KDE SC4 again and somebody has to step up > > and fix it with another patch. > > In the meantime we've diverging codebas

Re: Review Request 120431: Fix and future-proof Dr Konqi security methods on Bugzilla

> On Okt. 7, 2014, 1:13 nachm., Thomas Lübking wrote: > > drkonqi/bugzillalib.cpp, line 81 > > > > > > The patch largely consists of hand-crafted version handling. > > > > replacing this by "int version =

Re: kompare, libkomparediff2 and KDE Applications 14.12

Kevin, On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 4:30 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Hi, > > On Tuesday 07 October 2014 at 15:59:17, Jeremy Whiting wrote: >> Libkomparediff2 has been ported to kf5 for quite some time, kdevelop >> or kdevplatform frameworks based code (not sure if it's master or >> frameworks branches) u

Re: kompare, libkomparediff2 and KDE Applications 14.12

Hi, On Tuesday 07 October 2014 at 15:59:17, Jeremy Whiting wrote: > Libkomparediff2 has been ported to kf5 for quite some time, kdevelop > or kdevplatform frameworks based code (not sure if it's master or > frameworks branches) uses it and it seems to work ok there. I wonder > when we should merge

Re: Review Request 120431: Fix and future-proof Dr Konqi security methods on Bugzilla

> On oct. 7, 2014, 1:13 p.m., Thomas Lübking wrote: > > drkonqi/bugzillalib.cpp, line 81 > > > > > > The patch largely consists of hand-crafted version handling. > > > > replacing this by "int version = K

kompare, libkomparediff2 and KDE Applications 14.12

Kevin, Others, Libkomparediff2 has been ported to kf5 for quite some time, kdevelop or kdevplatform frameworks based code (not sure if it's master or frameworks branches) uses it and it seems to work ok there. I wonder when we should merge libkomparediff2's frameworks branch into master though. F

Re: Review Request 120376: drKonqi Fix Bug 337742 - Unable to send report: error code 410 from Bugzilla

> On Sept. 26, 2014, 11:54 a.m., Ian Wadham wrote: > > Hi Frédéric, > > > > As announced on KDE Core devel, in > > http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-core-devel&m=141016488132293&w=2 about 3 weeks > > ago, I also am working on Dr Konqi. > > > > I am about to publish a general patch, which is aimed a

Re: Review Request 120431: Fix and future-proof Dr Konqi security methods on Bugzilla

> On Oct. 7, 2014, 1:13 p.m., Thomas Lübking wrote: > > drkonqi/bugzillalib.cpp, line 81 > > > > > > The patch largely consists of hand-crafted version handling. > > > > replacing this by "int version = K

Re: Review Request 120431: Fix and future-proof Dr Konqi security methods on Bugzilla

> On Okt. 7, 2014, 1:13 nachm., Thomas Lübking wrote: > > My 2¢ > > Bugzilla will require an update anyway and that means at some point it'll > > be (then "silently") broken in KDE SC4 again and somebody has to step up > > and fix it with another patch. > > In the meantime we've diverging codeb

Re: KF 5.3.0 changelog

El Dimarts, 7 d'octubre de 2014, a les 22:42:36, Alexander Neundorf va escriure: > On Tuesday, October 07, 2014 22:32:43 Alexander Neundorf wrote: > > On Tuesday, October 07, 2014 21:47:07 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > > El Dimarts, 7 d'octubre de 2014, a les 21:40:41, Alexander Neundorf va > > >

Re: KF 5.3.0 changelog

On Tuesday, October 07, 2014 22:32:43 Alexander Neundorf wrote: > On Tuesday, October 07, 2014 21:47:07 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > El Dimarts, 7 d'octubre de 2014, a les 21:40:41, Alexander Neundorf va > > > > escriure: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Monday, October 06, 2014 23:14:33 David Faure wrot

Re: KF 5.3.0 changelog

On Tuesday, October 07, 2014 21:47:07 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El Dimarts, 7 d'octubre de 2014, a les 21:40:41, Alexander Neundorf va > > escriure: > > Hi, > > > > On Monday, October 06, 2014 23:14:33 David Faure wrote: > > > Dear workspace and application developers, > > > > > > In case you'r

Re: KF 5.3.0 changelog

El Dimarts, 7 d'octubre de 2014, a les 21:40:41, Alexander Neundorf va escriure: > Hi, > > On Monday, October 06, 2014 23:14:33 David Faure wrote: > > Dear workspace and application developers, > > > > In case you're not reading kde-announce, here's the list of changes in > > KF 5.3.0, just rele

Re: KF 5.3.0 changelog

Hi, On Monday, October 06, 2014 23:14:33 David Faure wrote: > Dear workspace and application developers, > > In case you're not reading kde-announce, here's the list of changes in > KF 5.3.0, just released. I also read https://dot.kde.org/2014/10/07/third-release-kde-frameworks-brings-multitud

Re: Review Request 120431: Fix and future-proof Dr Konqi security methods on Bugzilla

> On oct. 7, 2014, 1:13 p.m., Thomas Lübking wrote: > > My 2¢ > > Bugzilla will require an update anyway and that means at some point it'll > > be (then "silently") broken in KDE SC4 again and somebody has to step up > > and fix it with another patch. > > In the meantime we've diverging codebas

Re: Review Request 120431: Fix and future-proof Dr Konqi security methods on Bugzilla

> On oct. 5, 2014, 7:43 a.m., Ben Cooksley wrote: > > As this is needed to restore the functionality of Dr Konqi, can someone > > familiar with the codebase please review it so we can get this in? > > Ian Wadham wrote: > Perhaps I am the person most familiar with the codebase of Dr Konqi,

Re: Review Request 120431: Fix and future-proof Dr Konqi security methods on Bugzilla

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120431/#review68051 --- My 2¢ Bugzilla will require an update anyway and that means at

Re: Muon and kde-gtk-config moved to kde/workspace - was - Re: Moving repositories in the module structure

On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 11:37 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El Diumenge, 5 d'octubre de 2014, a les 20:30:33, Albert Astals Cid va > escriure: > > El Divendres, 3 d'octubre de 2014, a les 03:28:44, Aleix Pol va escriure: > > > Changes: > > > - kde-gtk-config was moved from extragear/base to kde/w

Re: Review Request 120431: Fix and future-proof Dr Konqi security methods on Bugzilla

> On Oct. 5, 2014, 9:43 a.m., Ben Cooksley wrote: > > As this is needed to restore the functionality of Dr Konqi, can someone > > familiar with the codebase please review it so we can get this in? > > Ian Wadham wrote: > Perhaps I am the person most familiar with the codebase of Dr Konqi,

Re: Review Request 120195: [OS X] make sure the appropriate menu items get put in the Application menu's About and Preferences items

> On Oct. 4, 2014, 3:40 p.m., Milian Wolff wrote: > > Ship It! I pushed to the kde4-legacy branch; should someone (((I?))) do a merge as I read on another RR? - René J.V. --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:

Re: Review Request 120431: Fix and future-proof Dr Konqi security methods on Bugzilla

> On oct. 5, 2014, 7:43 a.m., Ben Cooksley wrote: > > As this is needed to restore the functionality of Dr Konqi, can someone > > familiar with the codebase please review it so we can get this in? > > Ian Wadham wrote: > Perhaps I am the person most familiar with the codebase of Dr Konqi,

Re: Review Request 120431: Fix and future-proof Dr Konqi security methods on Bugzilla

> On Oct. 5, 2014, 7:43 a.m., Ben Cooksley wrote: > > As this is needed to restore the functionality of Dr Konqi, can someone > > familiar with the codebase please review it so we can get this in? > > Ian Wadham wrote: > Perhaps I am the person most familiar with the codebase of Dr Konqi,

Re: Review Request 120431: Fix and future-proof Dr Konqi security methods on Bugzilla

> On oct. 5, 2014, 7:43 a.m., Ben Cooksley wrote: > > As this is needed to restore the functionality of Dr Konqi, can someone > > familiar with the codebase please review it so we can get this in? > > Ian Wadham wrote: > Perhaps I am the person most familiar with the codebase of Dr Konqi,

Re: Review Request 120431: Fix and future-proof Dr Konqi security methods on Bugzilla

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120431/ --- (Updated oct. 7, 2014, 7:42 a.m.) Review request for KDE Software on Mac