On Tuesday 09 September 2014 17:41:59 Kevin Ottens wrote:
> You will still see me around of course. I'm retiring from KDE Frameworks,
> not from KDE. I just want to focus mainly on Zanshin and some of my
> community work (french promo, manifesto, e.V.). Because of my other
> involvements you'll pr
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120127/
---
Review request for kdelibs.
Repository: kdelibs
Description
---
Pr
On Wednesday, September 10, 2014 00.23:18 Jan Kundrát wrote:
> On Tuesday, 9 September 2014 21:44:25 CEST, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > Having two different patch review systems for one project... I
> > mean, this is
> > surely not a good idea. Two places to send patches, to places to review
> > p
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120119/
---
(Updated Sept. 10, 2014, 8:15 a.m.)
Review request for kdelibs and Stephe
On Tuesday 09 September 2014 20:02:55 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> In any case, can you see the inconsistency between saying "we need highly
> active repos to find pain points" and "these projects will only use it on an
> opt-in basis, and not even for all patches"? You may as well throw a more
> lightl
