On Tuesday, August 26, 2014 12.13:24 Ivan Čukić wrote:
> > Does the library make sense without the daemon? If not then it falls into
> > this constraint from https://community.kde.org/Frameworks/Policies :
> >
> > "Solutions have a mandatory runtime dependencies, it is part of their
> > design and
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Ivan Čukić wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> What do you think about splitting the kactivities repository into these:
> - library (would remain in the kactivities repo)
> - daemon (kactivities-service)
> - workspace stuff (kcm, doplhin file linking, activities:/ kio, somethin
> Does the library make sense without the daemon? If not then it falls into
> this constraint from https://community.kde.org/Frameworks/Policies :
>
> "Solutions have a mandatory runtime dependencies, it is part of their design
> and where their added value comes from"
That is the reason it ended
On Wednesday, August 13, 2014 11.35:37 Ivan Čukić wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> What do you think about splitting the kactivities repository into these:
> - library (would remain in the kactivities repo)
> - daemon (kactivities-service)
Does the library make sense without the daemon? If not then it falls
