Re: Proposal to improving KDE Software Repository Organization

2014-08-19 Thread Michael Pyne
On Wed, August 20, 2014 00:48:36 Àlex Fiestas wrote: > On Monday 18 August 2014 21:54:40 Michael Pyne wrote: > > We await your comments, suggestions, clarification requests, and other > > feedback. > > The proposed solution will clearly help to improve the situation, so +1! > > Something I would

Re: Proposal to improving KDE Software Repository Organization

2014-08-19 Thread Àlex Fiestas
On Monday 18 August 2014 21:54:40 Michael Pyne wrote: > We await your comments, suggestions, clarification requests, and other > feedback. The proposed solution will clearly help to improve the situation, so +1! Something I would like to explore is the possibility of putting on each repository th

Re: Proposal to improving KDE Software Repository Organization

2014-08-19 Thread Ben Cooksley
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Michael Pyne wrote: > On Tue, August 19, 2014 10:18:17 David Faure wrote: >> On Tuesday 19 August 2014 19:10:14 Ben Cooksley wrote: >> > The old kf5-qt5 / latest-qt4 names are being mapped to division / >> > track combinations. They are otherwise not used. >> >> Ah

Re: Proposal to improving KDE Software Repository Organization

2014-08-19 Thread Michael Pyne
On Tue, August 19, 2014 10:18:17 David Faure wrote: > On Tuesday 19 August 2014 19:10:14 Ben Cooksley wrote: > > The old kf5-qt5 / latest-qt4 names are being mapped to division / > > track combinations. They are otherwise not used. > > Ah! > > > Just a clarification though: there would only be tw

Re: Review Request 119727: Fix for Bug 337962 : accept()-call returns with invalid argument when using kwalletd with the pam-kwallet module

2014-08-19 Thread Helmut Schreiber
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119727/ --- (Updated ago. 19, 2014, 9:21 p.m.) Review request for KDE Runtime and Àle

Review Request 119727: Fix for Bug 337962 : accept()-call returns with invalid argument when using kwalletd with the pam-kwallet module

2014-08-19 Thread Helmut Schreiber
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119727/ --- Review request for KDE Runtime. Repository: kde-runtime Description ---

Re: Proposal to improving KDE Software Repository Organization

2014-08-19 Thread Aleix Pol
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 3:54 AM, Michael Pyne wrote: > Hi all, > > Ben Cooksley and I would like to get some feedback on further evolutions to > the organization structure we employ for the repositories at git.kde.org, > to > allow our current usage of CI even as we move farther into the KF5-base

Re: Proposal to improving KDE Software Repository Organization

2014-08-19 Thread David Faure
On Tuesday 19 August 2014 19:10:14 Ben Cooksley wrote: > The old kf5-qt5 / latest-qt4 names are being mapped to division / > track combinations. They are otherwise not used. Ah! > Just a clarification though: there would only be two divisions for the > above scenario: Plasma5 and KF5. > Plasma5 w

Re: Proposal to improving KDE Software Repository Organization

2014-08-19 Thread Ben Cooksley
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 6:55 PM, David Faure wrote: > Nice work. Thanks. > > Just one thing: > > On Monday 18 August 2014 21:54:40 Michael Pyne wrote: >> So "kf5-qt5" might mean "KF5/Devel, Plasma5/Devel, etc." while >> "kf5-qt5-stable" might mean "KF5/Devel, Plasma5/Stable, etc.". > > This