---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114907/
---
(Updated ago. 13, 2014, 9:29 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been di
Hello everyone,
after KDE SC 4.14, the next release of the KDE applications that are
part of the KDE SC is planned for December. It will contain not only
applications that are still based on Qt4+kdelibs 4.x, but also
applications that have the first stable release of their Qt5+KF5 ports
[1]. All a
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119701/#review64476
---
Ship it!
Thanks for working on this, and thanks everyone for
> > * there is a flag which allows building only the library at the moment,
> > but
> > that seems not enough.
>
> Using that flag allowed me to successfully compile the library on Windows.
Sorry, didn't mean that it did not help compiling, just that it seems that a
flag does not seem enough fo
On Wednesday 13 August 2014 14:04:54 Àlex Fiestas wrote:
> Indeed! maybe we can move it one slot down/up ?
And with up I mean before lunch ofc :p
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Wednesday 13 August 2014 13:32:18 Kevin Ottens wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wednesday 13 August 2014 12:15:18 Jan Grulich wrote:
> > I would like to inform that we decided to arrange a Solid BoF at
> > Akademy on Tuesday in the second room after lunch. If you are
> > interested in Solid stuff, includ
Hello,
On Wednesday 13 August 2014 12:15:18 Jan Grulich wrote:
> I would like to inform that we decided to arrange a Solid BoF at
> Akademy on Tuesday in the second room after lunch. If you are
> interested in Solid stuff, including Plasma Networkmanagement,
> KScreen, Powerdevil, Bluedevil etc. y
2014-08-13 11:35 GMT+02:00 Ivan Čukić :
> The reason why this came up again is that the library follows the requirements
> for frameworks regarding supported compilers and platforms, while the rest is
> *nix-only. (the trigger for the mail are the attempts Nicolás made to compile
> the service with
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 8:07 AM, Thomas Lübking
wrote:
> On Dienstag, 12. August 2014 21:20:41 CEST, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
>
>>> Is
>>>
>>> git symbolic-ref refs/heads/master refs/heads/KDE/4.14
>>>
>>> an option?
>>
>>
>> Maybe, what does it do?
>
>
> Create a symbolic ref "master" that like t
Hi,
I would like to inform that we decided to arrange a Solid BoF at
Akademy on Tuesday in the second room after lunch. If you are
interested in Solid stuff, including Plasma Networkmanagement,
KScreen, Powerdevil, Bluedevil etc. you are free to join us!!
[1] - https://community.kde.org/Akadem
Hi everybody, projects.kde.org has just got 2 new fields to declare i18n
branches, now we have
i18n trunk branch (kdelibs4)
i18n stable branch (kdelibs4)
i18n trunk branch (KF5)
i18n stable branch (KF5)
Please set those accordingly in your projects to help scripty and other
scripts that have t
Dear all, I am conducting a survey about the use of exception handling
constructs in C++. I would really appreciate if you could contribute
to this research by answering a few questions on the subject.
The survey is available on-line:
https://pt.surveymonkey.com/s/exceptionHandling
All the best,
Hi all,
What do you think about splitting the kactivities repository into these:
- library (would remain in the kactivities repo)
- daemon (kactivities-service)
- workspace stuff (kcm, doplhin file linking, activities:/ kio, something
else?)
The reason why this came up again is that the library
13 matches
Mail list logo
