On Friday 17 January 2014 17:50:38 Vishesh Handa wrote:
> On Friday 17 January 2014 01:47:17 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > I guess that most of the answers can be extracted from the emails
> > of the discussion, but having a central place that people can go
> > and read surely helps.
>
> http://com
On Friday 17 January 2014 17:50:38 Vishesh Handa wrote:
> Hey Albert
>
> Thanks for sending this email.
>
> On Friday 17 January 2014 01:47:17 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > Hi guys, seems we have reached a kind of impasse regarding what to do
> > with
> > Baloo and Nepomuk. Since the 4.13 freeze i
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115079/#review47586
---
there's no diff - should there be?
- Thomas Lübking
On Jan.
Hey guys
I should have posted this with the Baloo thread, but since I did not -
WIth KDE SC 4.10, Nepomuk dropped support for Strigi and implemented their own
indexing library. This code was part of nepomuk-core. With Baloo, this code
has been migrated into its own repository called kfilemetada
On Friday 17 January 2014 11:54:06 Mario Fux KDE ML wrote:
> Am Freitag, 10. Januar 2014, 11.28:34 schrieb Sebastian Kügler:
> > Hey,
>
> Morning sebas and Co
>
> Here finally my answer to this thread.
>
> [snip]
>
> > > - Digikam (gets new Nepomuk with 4.0.0 due in May or so. Will it work)?
>
Hey Albert
Thanks for sending this email.
On Friday 17 January 2014 01:47:17 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> Hi guys, seems we have reached a kind of impasse regarding what to do with
> Baloo and Nepomuk. Since the 4.13 freeze is coming sooner than you think
> (less than 6 weeks) I'd like to try to ge
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115079/
---
Review request for kde-workspace and Martin Gräßlin.
Repository: kde-work
> On Dec. 24, 2013, 1:13 p.m., Martin Tobias Holmedahl Sandsmark wrote:
> > what a silly function, but looks okay to me.
>
> Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
> Shouldn't this go to KF5?
> Also kdelibs is feature frozen...
yes, it should go into kf5 as well, but it was decided some time ago tha
> On Dec. 24, 2013, 1:13 p.m., Martin Tobias Holmedahl Sandsmark wrote:
> > what a silly function, but looks okay to me.
Shouldn't this go to KF5?
Also kdelibs is feature frozen...
- Aleix
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail.
Am Freitag, 10. Januar 2014, 11.28:34 schrieb Sebastian Kügler:
> Hey,
Morning sebas and Co
Here finally my answer to this thread.
[snip]
> > - Digikam (gets new Nepomuk with 4.0.0 due in May or so. Will it work)?
>
> Maybe this feature is worth delaying then?
Is anybody of the Digikam team r
On Friday, 2014-01-17, 01:47:17, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> If we move now, in one year we will have had 1 year of real usage uncovering
> bugs and 1 year of bugfixes.
>
> If we move in one year, we will have lost that 1 year of real usage (since
> few people will be using it) and so in one year
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 1:47 AM, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
>
> Thus my suggestion is that after we get the wiki done and we explain
> clearly
> the situation as Thomas Lübking suggested (i.e. if you really really really
> really need what Nepomuk provides and can't accept a single regression in
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
