El Diumenge, 12 de gener de 2014, a les 00:16:57, Andreas Cord-Landwehr va
escriure:
> Hey all,
>
> after about one year of development and two technical preview releases, we
> thought that is time to move Artikulate to KDE Review, with the goal to
> land eventually in the KDE Educational module.
On Monday, January 13, 2014 17:05:04 Kevin Krammer wrote:
>
> I've looked around and found quite a variation:
>
> e.g. qdatetime.cpp:
> switch (...) {
> case Foo: {
> }
> }
>
> e.g. qrasterizer.cpp:
> switch (...) {
> case Foo:
> {
> }
> }
> e.g. qcommandlineparser.cpp:
> switch (
> On Oct. 22, 2013, 9:42 a.m., David Faure wrote:
> > I'm not sure how kcharselect (the program) differs from KCharSelect (the
> > kdelibs class), but is there any way this could go into the program only?
> > There isn't much usefulness in showing latex commands when bringing up
> > KCharSelec
El Dilluns, 13 de gener de 2014, a les 16:53:01, Ben Cooksley va escriure:
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 2:28 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > El Diumenge, 12 de gener de 2014, a les 15:47:40, Barth Netterfield va
> >
> > escriure:
> >> On January 12, 2014 9:41:28 PM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> >> > E
> On Jan. 13, 2014, 6:03 p.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > Wouldn't that break KDElibs4 applications talking to kglobalacceld from KF5?
>
> Thomas Lübking wrote:
> On Montag, 13. Januar 2014 19:24:12 CEST, Michael Jansen wrote:
> > Yes it would. There can be only one kglobalaccel. If its f
Hello everyone,
This is a reminder that we're still looking for maintainers for our
frameworks. Out of the 57 existing frameworks 33 have no maintainer (yes,
that's almost 60%). I don't know about you, but I find that worrying.
The modules without maintainers are spread this way:
- 9 are tier
> On Jan. 13, 2014, 6:03 p.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > Wouldn't that break KDElibs4 applications talking to kglobalacceld from KF5?
>
> Thomas Lübking wrote:
> On Montag, 13. Januar 2014 19:24:12 CEST, Michael Jansen wrote:
> > Yes it would. There can be only one kglobalaccel. If its f
> On Jan. 13, 2014, 6:03 p.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > Wouldn't that break KDElibs4 applications talking to kglobalacceld from KF5?
On Montag, 13. Januar 2014 19:24:12 CEST, Michael Jansen wrote:
> Yes it would. There can be only one kglobalaccel. If its from kde4 or kde4
> shouldn't matter s
>
>
> Wouldn't that break KDElibs4 applications talking to kglobalacceld from KF5?
>
> - Martin Gräßlin
>
Yes it would. There can be only one kglobalaccel. If its from kde4 or kde4
shouldn't matter so it HAS to keep dbus compatibility.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115001/#review47339
---
Wouldn't that break KDElibs4 applications talking to kglobalac
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115001/#review47338
---
given that the framework installs into KF5GlobalAccel and has
Am Montag, 13. Januar 2014, 17:05:04 schrieb Kevin Krammer:
> Hi all,
>
> at KDE PIM we are cleaning up our code base from over a decade of different
> coding styles. Well, "we" means Guy Maurel, he does all the actual work :)
>
> We follow the "kdelibs" rules which in turn are close to what Qt u
Hi all,
at KDE PIM we are cleaning up our code base from over a decade of different
coding styles. Well, "we" means Guy Maurel, he does all the actual work :)
We follow the "kdelibs" rules which in turn are close to what Qt uses IIRC.
Now we've hit a snag. There is no common rule regarding bloc
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115001/
---
Review request for kde-workspace and Martin Klapetek.
Repository: kde-wor
Mandag 13. januar 2014 02.24.30 skrev Albert Astals Cid:
> El Divendres, 3 de gener de 2014, a les 22:09:04, Frederik Gladhorn va
>
> escriure:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Mario Fux asked if I could make a release of libqaccessibilityclient. When
> > I started this little lib it was seemingly KDE only but wi
On January 12, 2014 1:36:29 PM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> Hi there, can anyone explain how kst-plot ended up in extragear if it didn't
> go thorugh kdereview?
>
> Or if it went thorugh kdereview why is there no email in k-c-d about it?
>
> Cheers,
> Albert
What I know is covered in the discu
On January 12, 2014 9:41:28 PM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> El Diumenge, 12 de gener de 2014, a les 15:32:16, Barth Netterfield va
>
> escriure:
> > On January 12, 2014 1:36:29 PM Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > > Hi there, can anyone explain how kst-plot ended up in extragear if it
> > > didn't go th
Hey all,
after about one year of development and two technical preview releases, we
thought that is time to move
Artikulate to KDE Review, with the goal to land eventually in the KDE
Educational module. (a heads-up mail
about this proposal also goes to the KDE-Edu list)
The repository for rev
18 matches
Mail list logo
