Review Request 114956: Add support for getting a samba share's total size and free space through KIO

2014-01-10 Thread Mathias Tillman
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114956/ --- Review request for KDE Runtime. Bugs: 245226 http://bugs.kde.org/show

Re: Moving Baloo and Baloo-widgets into KDE SC

2014-01-10 Thread Thomas Lübking
On Freitag, 10. Januar 2014 11:28:34 CEST, Sebastian Kügler wrote: with the long term support workspace out, so we can recommend people to use that, if they're slightly more adventurous, run 4.13 I'm not sure whether I understand that - afaiu there will be no workspace > 4.11 ever, but other

Re: Moving Baloo and Baloo-widgets into KDE SC

2014-01-10 Thread David Edmundson
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Jan Kundrát wrote: > On Friday, 10 January 2014 11:02:22 CEST, Mario Fux KDE ML wrote: >> >> - KPhotoalbum > > > The only reason why KPhotoAlbum links with Nepomuk is because of the rating > widget ("the five stars in a row") which lives in a Nepomuk-provided > lib

Re: Moving Baloo and Baloo-widgets into KDE SC

2014-01-10 Thread Jan Kundrát
On Friday, 10 January 2014 11:02:22 CEST, Mario Fux KDE ML wrote: - KPhotoalbum The only reason why KPhotoAlbum links with Nepomuk is because of the rating widget ("the five stars in a row") which lives in a Nepomuk-provided library. *Nothing* has been stored in a Nepomuk DB form inside KPA,

Re: Moving Baloo and Baloo-widgets into KDE SC

2014-01-10 Thread Vishesh Handa
On Friday 10 Jan 2014 11:02:22 Mario Fux KDE ML wrote: > > IIRC it's still not clear for all the current Nepomuk apps if they work > after 4.13. Let's try to list them again. > > - Amarok (got Nepomuk support with 2.7, will it work after 4.13? No. It will not. There is no way this can be ported.

Re: Moving Baloo and Baloo-widgets into KDE SC

2014-01-10 Thread Vishesh Handa
On Friday 10 Jan 2014 12:07:04 Shantanu Tushar Jha wrote: > On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 3:56 AM, Àlex Fiestas wrote: > > On Thursday 09 January 2014 21:52:52 Christoph Feck wrote: > > > But if the above scenario does not work, we should probably not > > > introduce Baloo for KDE SC 4.x. > > > > I hav

Re: Moving Baloo and Baloo-widgets into KDE SC

2014-01-10 Thread Sebastian Kügler
Hey, On Friday, January 10, 2014 11:02:22 Mario Fux KDE ML wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 09. Januar 2014, 23.26:01 schrieb Àlex Fiestas: > > If the breakage is minimal (which I know it is, but I will let vHanda > > reply > > to that) I vote to replace it even if we make a bit worse the experience > > u

Re: Moving Baloo and Baloo-widgets into KDE SC

2014-01-10 Thread Mario Fux KDE ML
Am Donnerstag, 09. Januar 2014, 23.26:01 schrieb Àlex Fiestas: Morning Alex > On Thursday 09 January 2014 21:52:52 Christoph Feck wrote: > > But if the above scenario does not work, we should probably not > > introduce Baloo for KDE SC 4.x. > > I have to disagree here. And I'm probably disagree

Re: Moving Baloo and Baloo-widgets into KDE SC

2014-01-10 Thread Shantanu Tushar Jha
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 3:56 AM, Àlex Fiestas wrote: > On Thursday 09 January 2014 21:52:52 Christoph Feck wrote: > > But if the above scenario does not work, we should probably not > > introduce Baloo for KDE SC 4.x. > > I have to disagree here. > > We can't keep playing this conservative when w

Re: Moving Baloo and Baloo-widgets into KDE SC

2014-01-10 Thread Vishesh Handa
On Thursday 09 Jan 2014 21:52:52 Christoph Feck wrote: > On Thursday 09 January 2014 13:42:12 Vishesh Handa wrote: > > Rough Update - > > > > The migrator has been written and tested for files. The tags, > > rating, comments and indexing configuration are properly migrated. > > Is this a one-time