---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114717/
---
(Updated Jan. 8, 2014, 7:24 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been mar
On Tuesday 07 of January 2014 23:10:11 John Layt wrote:
> On 7 January 2014 19:55, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > El Dimarts, 7 de gener de 2014, a les 18:24:41, Alex Merry va escriure:
> >> On 07/01/14 17:10, John Layt wrote:
> >> > I've put myself down (rather obviously) for KPrintUtils. Most of
Hi,
Registration is now open for the eighth annual C++Now conference
(formerly BoostCon) which will be held in Aspen, Colorado, USA, May
12th to 17th, 2014.
C++Now is a general C++ conference for C++ experts and enthusiasts.
It is not specific to any library/framework or compiler vendor and
has t
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114910/
---
(Updated Jan. 8, 2014, 8:25 p.m.)
Review request for kde-workspace and Pl
> On Jan. 8, 2014, 5:06 p.m., Thomas Lübking wrote:
> > briefly looking at the bug - wouldn't it be better to only cause a full
> > parent repaint when adding/removing an (fdo) icon?
I have tried it but without success. Adding/removing/changing visibility
preference of icons is done on QML sid
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114910/#review47049
---
briefly looking at the bug - wouldn't it be better to only cau
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/110813/#review47043
---
sorry for the late review. It didn't end in my review board in
On 7 January 2014 23:52, Alex Merry wrote:
> If these additions are something that applications would need to be
> aware of, I see no issue with creating a wrapper class or some such
> as-and-when we find a use for one.
>
> If they are something that would be hidden to applications, would you
> c
On Wednesday 08 January 2014 10:56:41 John Layt wrote:
> On 8 January 2014 07:17, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> > For the record, if that depends on QtPrintSupport it can't make it to
> > KGuiAddons (which should depend only on QtCore and QtGui).
>
> Good point :-)
>
> > I'm fine keeping it even if it's
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114889/#review47040
---
This review has been submitted with commit
149fd780c71b3d8d3d
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114889/
---
(Updated Jan. 8, 2014, 10:43 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been ma
On 8 January 2014 07:17, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> For the record, if that depends on QtPrintSupport it can't make it to
> KGuiAddons (which should depend only on QtCore and QtGui).
Good point :-)
> I'm fine keeping it even if it's small.
OK, I'll take the chainsaw to it this weekend and see what
On 7 January 2014 23:30, Michal Humpula wrote:
> If I may post a little input here. I've implemented print preview in kate
> (KF5) with QPrintPreviewDialog, mainly for the reasons mentioned above. But
> what I'm missing is ability to add custom configuration tabs as in
> KdePrint::createPrintDial
> On Jan. 8, 2014, 8:10 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > If you have the possibility (build setup) please merge to master and fix
> > the merge conflict I expect to see :-) I merged 4.11 into master yesterday
> > so there should no be anything else which could conflict.
>
> Wolfgang Bauer wrote
> On Jan. 8, 2014, 8:10 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > If you have the possibility (build setup) please merge to master and fix
> > the merge conflict I expect to see :-) I merged 4.11 into master yesterday
> > so there should no be anything else which could conflict.
>
> Wolfgang Bauer wrote
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114889/#review47027
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Chusslove Illich
On Jan. 7, 2014, 5:24
> On Jan. 8, 2014, 8:10 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > If you have the possibility (build setup) please merge to master and fix
> > the merge conflict I expect to see :-) I merged 4.11 into master yesterday
> > so there should no be anything else which could conflict.
I have committed to 4.11
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114841/
---
(Updated Jan. 8, 2014, 8:59 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been mar
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114841/#review47023
---
This review has been submitted with commit
c1761755915ab59f41
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114910/
---
(Updated Jan. 8, 2014, 12:59 p.m.)
Review request for kde-workspace and P
20 matches
Mail list logo
