Re: Review Request 111851: Split KCModules into different Categories in KHelpcenter's navigation tree

2013-12-12 Thread Ben Cooksley
> On Nov. 29, 2013, 7:32 p.m., Ben Cooksley wrote: > > Patch looks fine to me, sucks a bit that the names have to be hardcoded for > > certain lists but not much can be done there if that is what the > > applications do... > > Burkhard Lück wrote: > "Patch looks fine to me" = "Ship It!" ?

Re: Nepomuk in 4.13 and beyond

2013-12-12 Thread Ivan Čukić
> for the Plasma Active shell as it currently is, single-store querying might > be workable as we tend to keep most of the different resources separated in > the UI (though that’s one thing i want to change in future releases, so you > can group a set of bookmarks with a given file, e.g.) Piggy-b

Re: Review Request 114214: remove QDesktopWidget global static

2013-12-12 Thread Patrick Spendrin
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114214/ --- (Updated Dec. 12, 2013, 8:35 p.m.) Status -- This change has been mar

Re: Nepomuk in 4.13 and beyond

2013-12-12 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Thursday, December 12, 2013 20:10:27 Vishesh Handa wrote: > On Thursday 12 Dec 2013 19:40:11 Ivan Čukić wrote: > > > If we all decide to store stuff in sqlite, then it doesn't matter if > > > they > > > are separate database files or the same one. > > > > I might be missing a few things here, b

Re: Nepomuk in 4.13 and beyond

2013-12-12 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Thursday 12 December 2013, Ignacio Serantes wrote: > Welcome Baloo, > > New suggestions about development direction to avoid some problems related > to Nepomuk: > > 1) Baloo must work as a service to share information with other users and > minimize resources consumption. With Nepomuk a login

Re: Nepomuk in 4.13 and beyond

2013-12-12 Thread Vishesh Handa
On Thursday 12 Dec 2013 19:40:11 Ivan Čukić wrote: > > If we all decide to store stuff in sqlite, then it doesn't matter if they > > are separate database files or the same one. > > I might be missing a few things here, but asking questions is the road to > enlightenment :) > > - There is no way

Re: QDialog on stack+exec and dbus quit crash is no more

2013-12-12 Thread David Faure
On Monday 11 November 2013 21:04:35 Jan Kundrát wrote: > On Monday, 11 November 2013 19:17:22 CEST, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > Not sure you're understanding what i say, we have an explicit check about > > QDialog on stack+exec that says "it will crash if you dbus quit". > > We've chatted about t

Re: QDialog on stack+exec and dbus quit crash is no more

2013-12-12 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dijous, 12 de desembre de 2013, a les 19:57:25, David Faure va escriure: > On Monday 11 November 2013 21:04:35 Jan Kundrát wrote: > > On Monday, 11 November 2013 19:17:22 CEST, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > > Not sure you're understanding what i say, we have an explicit check > > > about > > > QD

Re: class SimpleJob requires a valid object of class QCoreApplication

2013-12-12 Thread David Faure
On Sunday 17 November 2013 21:36:22 Krzysztof Żelechowski wrote: > If no valid application object is present, the constructor of SimpleJob > causes a NULL pointer dereference. > > Please add the following comment to the description of class SimpleJob: > > An object of this class (or of a derived

Re: Review Request 114214: remove QDesktopWidget global static

2013-12-12 Thread David Faure
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114214/#review45613 --- Ship it! Ship It! - David Faure On Nov. 29, 2013, 9 p.m., P

Re: Best practice for libraries supporting both Qt4 and Qt5

2013-12-12 Thread David Faure
On Sunday 01 December 2013 14:18:35 Thiago Macieira wrote: > On domingo, 1 de dezembro de 2013 13:42:15, Rex Dieter wrote: > > Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote: > > > On Thursday 28 November 2013, Michael Palimaka wrote: > > >> Any thoughts? > > > > > > In an ideal world we would convince the distros t

Re: Nepomuk in 4.13 and beyond

2013-12-12 Thread Ivan Čukić
> If we all decide to store stuff in sqlite, then it doesn't matter if they > are separate database files or the same one. I might be missing a few things here, but asking questions is the road to enlightenment :) - There is no way to query across different stores, which was the main appeal of

Re: Nepomuk in 4.13 and beyond

2013-12-12 Thread Vishesh Handa
On Thursday 12 Dec 2013 19:08:23 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > On Thursday, December 12, 2013 18:28:24 you wrote: > > What exactly do you want to integrate? > > Plasma Active things. > Could you please enumerate what all that involves? From what I know there is - 1. Metadata model for running queries

Re: Nepomuk in 4.13 and beyond

2013-12-12 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
On Thursday, December 12, 2013 18:28:24 you wrote: > What exactly do you want to integrate? Plasma Active things. > > what is the Baloo equivalent of the Nepomuk API currently in kdelibs? > > (i’ve looked in the ballo repo, it isn’t clear at first glance) > > There isn't a clear Resource API any

Re: Nepomuk in 4.13 and beyond

2013-12-12 Thread Vishesh Handa
On Thursday 12 Dec 2013 13:24:04 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > hi ... > > just replying to k-c-d because i loath massively-cross-posted email > discussions. > On Thursday, December 12, 2013 11:46:53 Vishesh Handa wrote: > > Each of these problems is independently solvable without RDF. > > ah, how wonde

Re: Nepomuk in 4.13 and beyond

2013-12-12 Thread Vishesh Handa
On Thursday 12 Dec 2013 12:34:40 Ivan Čukić wrote: > Aloha, > > > - Resource Description Framework (RDF) > > The biggest problem with RDF is that it raises the knowledge needed to > > I'm not sure this was *the* problem with nepomuk adoption, but lets ignore > that for a moment :) > > So, nepo

Re: Nepomuk in 4.13 and beyond

2013-12-12 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
hopefully not demonstrating my own naivety about nepomuk ... On Thursday, December 12, 2013 13:01:29 Ignacio Serantes wrote: > 1) Baloo must work as a service to share information with other users and > minimize resources consumption. With Nepomuk a login is required and in > multiuser environment

Re: Nepomuk in 4.13 and beyond

2013-12-12 Thread Ignacio Serantes
Welcome Baloo, New suggestions about development direction to avoid some problems related to Nepomuk: 1) Baloo must work as a service to share information with other users and minimize resources consumption. With Nepomuk a login is required and in multiuser environment this is a problem. 2) Data

Re: Nepomuk in 4.13 and beyond

2013-12-12 Thread Aaron J. Seigo
hi ... just replying to k-c-d because i loath massively-cross-posted email discussions. On Thursday, December 12, 2013 11:46:53 Vishesh Handa wrote: > Each of these problems is independently solvable without RDF. ah, how wonderful. what you describe is amazingly similar to the system Wheeler a

Re: Nepomuk in 4.13 and beyond

2013-12-12 Thread Ivan Čukić
Aloha, > - Resource Description Framework (RDF) > The biggest problem with RDF is that it raises the knowledge needed to I'm not sure this was *the* problem with nepomuk adoption, but lets ignore that for a moment :) So, nepomuk was based on rdf and sparql. Essentially, a simple and standardiz

Nepomuk in 4.13 and beyond

2013-12-12 Thread Vishesh Handa
Hey everyone During the KDE 4.11 cycle Nepomuk reached a maturity level that we were happy with, it is reasonably fast, stable, and unless used together with Akonadi it is no longer the "CPU consumer" it was before. We reached this state after years of analyzing what was wrong and what could b